Author: ehvnqpmy

  • Giving You The Tools To Bitcoin In Peace, Pt. 5

    Previously

    In the previous article, here, we looked at “The Second Age Of Enlightenment“, a new era of reason, rationality, innovation, prosperity, and individual liberty brought about by the advent of a hard money standard based upon bitcoin.

    We’re in the final article of this opening series. I appreciate all you for getting this far. I hope I’ve made it worth your while and provided compelling content to consider rethinking the proper role of government as well as the means by which bitcoin reshapes the conversation of civics.

    Now, we will cover why this blog exists – to empower all of you in your quest to regain control of your lives by wresting power back from government.

    Why Did I Create BitcoinInPeace.com?

    I want BitcoinInPeace.com to be your one-stop-shop for all things bitcoin.

    While I am well versed in bitcoin, I am honest enough to tell you that I cannot answer every single question about it.  But, I can point you in the right direction.  Part of the service that I am providing here is curated materials, quality sources which I have vetted and trust enough to pass your way.
    These trusted sources have done the hard work of researching various topics on bitcoin and have often done a better job of explaining it than I have.  I’m OK with that.  I don’t need to know everything; I merely have to be a trusted source for you.  In doing so, my job is to earn your trust so that you come back here whenever you want to learn more about bitcoin and how to make it work for you.

    My Pledge To You

    Ultimately, I will do my personal best to help you achieve four things:

    1. To become an independent and rational thinker.
    2. Create self-sovereignty over your own life.
    3. Understand bitcoin well enough to hold and use it with great confidence.
    4. Become a great advocate for individual liberty and bitcoin to others, a “force multiplier”. [X] < force multiplier in Special Forces >

    Author’s Note: Overall, if you’re a devoted bitcoiner now then you’re in an elite group. If you’re a believe in the supremacy of the individual over the collective then you have an ethical obligation to do your person best to help others achieve self-sovereignty. Find your path for promoting freedom and make it yours. BitcoinInPeace.com is my means of doing just that.

    The only four things that I ask of you is to DO THE WORK (DTW).

    1. Doing the work means spending time understanding the material.
    2. Getting into substantive discussions (and maybe some civil debates) with those around you to help them understand what bitcoin is.
    3. Actively finding others who will challenge your beliefs.
    4. Talking with others who know more about the topic of bitcoin than you do.

    OK, OK, maybe the fifth thing you can do is refer your friends and family to BitcoinInPeace.com!

    Why Is This So Important?

    Why would I spend so much time, energy, and effort on this one topic?

    Because…

    • Bitcoin is not a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
      • Bitcoin is not a once-in-a-generation opportunity.
        • Bitcoin is a once-in-a-species opportunity.

    Yes, I think it is that important.

    If you’re looking for truth, personal responsibility, and individual liberty then bitcoin and BitcoinInPeace.com are for you.

    What To Expect: Resistance

    Don’t be fooled:

    Getting the government out of our lives
    via a bitcoin standard is going to be a
    DIFFICULT AND TREACHEROUS JOURNEY.

    Governments will not accept this transition quietly.  They will do everything they can to fight back.  Expecting anything less is foolish.

    Be vigilant. Be careful.  Be brave.

    Your Personal Support Group

    If you’re looking for a group of like-minded individuals who get together virtually on a regular basis to discuss bitcoin and topics surrounding it then I recommend my MeetUp group, “Bitcoin, Huntsville, Crypto, & Coffee“.
    For any nagging questions that you might have, topics which you want to bring up, or if you just want to listen and be around other bitcoiners who have deep confidence in what we’re doing, then drop in!  We meet two times every month and have people of all experience levels.  If you’re a newbie then you’ll fit right in!

    Where To From Here?

    Keep coming back!

    BitcoinInPeace.com is a resource for you.  You’ll find more articles pertaining to a variety of themes, some related directly to bitcoin and other connected loosely with it (i.e. history, culture, technology, civics, philosophy, economics, and personal finance).

    Overall, the mission is the same:
    draining the lifeblood of government –
    fiat currencies, inflation, and state debt.

    Keep stacking sats and we’ll see you on the other side of the orange bridge!

    Bonus Section

    If you want to read a little more about why I created BitcoinInPeace.com and how it can help you then please read the second part, which you can find <here>.  I provide some more insights, direction, and tips.

    Donations

    If you found value in this article please feel free to donate via the following payment methods:

    CashApp:
    $JohnYoung357

    Venmo:
    @John-Young-359

    Bitcoin:
    Bc1qay7mwv6zfepgx8jarw9jhmera660g4f0k4ukv7

    End Notes, References, & Citations

    [1] Force multiplier

    Brave search engine summary: “force multiplier in the military
    Special operations forces are widely recognized as a critical force multiplier in modern military strategy, enabling smaller, highly trained units to achieve disproportionate effects on the battlefield. Their effectiveness stems from a combination of advanced technology, specialized training, and strategic flexibility, allowing them to conduct high-risk missions with minimal casualties and maximum impact.

    • Special operations troops are described as a “force multiplier” because they provide senior commanders with a wide array of options for addressing complex challenges in the war on global terrorism, including combat missions, reconnaissance, psychological operations, and training.
    • The integration of advanced technology, such as night-vision equipment, precision-guided munitions, drones, and secure communications, significantly enhances the lethality and efficiency of special operations units.
    • The successful raid on Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and the operation to eliminate Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in Syria are prime examples of how special operations leverage force multipliers like intelligence, stealth, night operations, and K9 units to achieve mission success.
    • The concept extends beyond hardware; human factors like elite training, experience, morale, and innovative tactics are also fundamental force multipliers.
    • The U.S. Army’s C100 unmanned aerial system, equipped with modular payloads for GPS-denied operations, extended communications, and electronic warfare, is being deployed to enhance situational awareness and freedom of maneuver, positioning it as an “ultimate force multiplier” for field operators.”

    Brave search engine summary “force multiplier in Special Forces
    In Special Forces, a force multiplier refers to a factor or combination of factors that enables a small, highly trained unit to achieve a disproportionately large effect, effectively magnifying their combat potential and operational success. The core concept is that a small team can train, lead, and enable a much larger force of local fighters or allied personnel to accomplish significant objectives. For example, a standard U.S. Army Special Forces A Team, consisting of 12 members, is designed to train and lead a company-sized unit of 100 to 200 local guerrillas.
    This principle is exemplified by the role of Special Operations Forces (SOF) in modern conflicts. In Afghanistan, U.S. Navy SEALs and other SOF units were deployed not just to conduct direct action missions, but also to train and mentor local forces, thereby creating a multiplier effect where a single small team could influence the capabilities of hundreds of indigenous fighters. Similarly, Russia’s Special Operations Forces Command (KSSO) has been described as a key force multiplier for the Kremlin, allowing it to achieve significant political and military objectives in regions like Crimea and Syria with a relatively small number of personnel.
    The effectiveness of Special Forces as force multipliers stems from their specialized skills, advanced training, and ability to operate in complex environments. Their capabilities in areas like special reconnaissance (SR), which involves persistent surveillance in hostile or denied territories for strategic intelligence, are critical components of this multiplier effect. Furthermore, the integration of technology, such as precision-guided munitions (PGMs) and airborne early warning and control systems (AWACS), enhances the impact of Special Forces operations by providing superior situational awareness and targeting accuracy. The use of deception and asymmetric warfare tactics also contributes to the perception of a larger force, further amplifying their influence.

    Author’s Note: There is a difference between “special operations force” and “Special Forces“.

    • Special operations forces are also called “SOF’s“. The following units within the U.S. Military are considered SOF:
      • Army: Rangers, Combat Applications Group (CAG), Special Forces, 160th SOAR
      • USMC: Force Recon
      • Air Force: Para-Rescue
      • Navy: SEALs
      • And a whole host of other, lesser well-known, yet impressive units.
    • All of them are SOF but there is only one group called “Special Forces“. There are even SOF units around the world (i.e. Russian Spetznas, British Special Air Service (SAS) and Special Boat Service (SBS)).
    • Special Forces” is colloquially called the “Green Berets“. There is no unit patch which has the words Green Berets. For the curious, ask any Green Beret what the “long tab” is. They will explain that it is the tab worn on the left shoulder which says the words “Special Forces”.
  • Bitcoin’s Impact On The World, Pt. 4.3 – What Does It All Mean?

    Previously

    In the previous article, here, we made principle-based attempts to create high-level forecasts of what the relationship would be between the governing and the governed, the ruling and the ruled, [1] after we adopt a bitcoin standard and move into a hyper-bitcoinization world. Our starting point for these forecasts were grounded on the works of two relatively unknown groups of promoters of individual liberty, cypherpunks and Austrian School economists, as well as the globe’s known and established history of the use of a hard money standard.
    Now, we can bring the entirety of the opening series to bear onto this one article. We have have developed a very specific thesis regarding the nature of governments and their eternal quest for unchecked and unlimited power.
    Instead of becoming bitter or incapacitated about the fundamental nature of the state, we can become activated because we now have an escape hatch from its naturally oppressive nature. That escape hatch is called… bitcoin.

    Tying It All Together / The New “New World

    1492 was the beginning of the trend of the rest of the world moving to the “New World” to achieve individual liberty.

    That was a movement in space because it put
    them out of reach of their old governments.

    Those brave individuals leaving their homelands for this raw and unknown world was an act of defiance against the Old World expressed as, I will not participate.  They refused to participate in the antiquated ways of the caste systems, monarchies, and oppression of the heavy & intrusive state.  America became their proverbial escape hatch.
    These legions of freedom seekers needed only one thing from the governments of the New World, Stay out of my way and let me live my life.
    Now, bitcoin is the embodiment of that American ideal – individual liberty.  Bitcoin is the new “New World”.  It is that movement towards freedom in a completely different direction and realm because it moves us out of reach of government.

    Bitcoin has become the ultimate escape hatch.

    Much like the early American settlers, each person moving to bitcoin is also engaging in an act of defiance against the state expressed as, “I will not participate.“  As the Constitution intended, it gets government out of the way so that we can live our lives unencumbered by the leviathan of the unconstrained state.

    This will be a movement in time because
    individuals will maintain their life savings
    in the most pristine asset ever devised and
    keep it out of the hands of authoritarian states.

    Satoshi’s Summit“: Bitcoin Has Become The Real “Galt’s Gulch

    In her magnum opus, “Atlas Shrugged“, the author, Ayn Rand, crafted a mysterious hero, John Galt, as the embodiment of the human drive for reason and individual liberty, while the motor he invented was the symbol of the application of reason and liberty to the perpetual human quest for innovation and ingenuity.
    In her novel, the world was slowly grinding to a halt due to overbearing and authoritarian states.  Galt convinced the protagonists, the producers of the world, to withdraw their minds, innovations, and active participation from the world’s stage and to allow the world to fail spectacularly on its own.  The place that Galt invited these producers to as their haven from oppressive government was dubbed “Galt’s Gulch” by those who resided there.
    Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous name of the inventor of bitcoin, is our cyber John Galt and bitcoin is our cyber Galt’s Gulch. [2] Much like Galt, Nakamoto has proverbially whispered to some of us around the world and convinced us no longer to participate in the regimes of nihilism, cronyism, and corruption. Satoshi Nakamoto has invited us all to “Satoshi’s Summit“. [3]
    Whereas John Galt personally convinced only the producers and innovators of the world to withdraw their minds, inventions , and involvement from the world’s stage, Satoshi Nakamoto, from a distance and through his work, is slowly convincing the producers, rational thinkers, and honest dealers to withdraw their active participation from the fiat currency schemes of today.
    Just as Galt’s Gulch was the proverbial singular escape hatch for the innovators, risk takers, trailblazers, and producers of his era, so too is bitcoin our escape hatch from the current paradigm of the obtrusive, intrusive, and overbearing state. 

    The only difference between Galt and Nakamoto is that
    Satoshi has invited everyone to Satoshi’s Summit.

    Now, it is up to each person to choose rationally, wisely, and freely.

    The Second Age Of Enlightenment

    The hard money standard which began in Europe in 1252 brought us great wonders such as The Renaissance, The (First) Age Of Enlightenment, the Mona Lisa, Notre Dame, and the exploration of the New World. [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

    Author’s Note: Credit to Saifedean Ammous for discussing the amazing developments from the First Age of Enlightenment in his book, “The Bitcoin Standard“.

    All of the above came about because the European governments were naturally constrained by hard money and budgets, allowing the free markets to operate maximally. Thus, the citizens of those countries did not need to concern themselves with the quality of their monetary systems because their governments could not inflate the money supplies and deflate the values, ethics, and investments of the people.
    In his seminal article, “Bitcoin is Not a Hedge“, Parker Lewis gave us his iconic quote:

    “Bitcoin is not a hedge against inflation;
    it is the permanent solution to inflation,
    and those are two very different things

    Bitcoin removes the artificiality of government induced inflation and creates a common set of rules which everyone can voluntarily follow.
    Just as the city-state of Florence ushered in the hard money standard [9] which spurned the European Renaissance and the First Age of Enlightenment, [10] Nakamoto has ushered in the Second Age of Enlightenment by issuing bitcoin.

    The BitcoinInPeace Thesis

    I think that the only way that any of us can push ourselves “out of the system” is to become as independent and self-sovereign as possible. We achieve self-sovereignty by avoiding entanglements with the state when possible (i.e. entitlements, government contracts, debt, fiat currency, fiat finance, etc.).

    Bitcoin is our best means of doing just that.

    Contrary to what many listless leaders, faux philosophers, and pontificating politicians have argued for centuries, I don’t think that self-sovereignty, economic prosperity, and political freedom are mutually exclusive.  In fact, many have argued (and what I also believe) that all three are tightly intertwined and mutually dependent; we cannot have one without the other two.

    Ultimately, that which promotes individual
    liberty is also best for the causes of
    human prosperity and self-actualization. [11]

    Next Up

    This brings Part 4 of the opening series to a close. I appreciate you sticking with me this entire time! We’re in the final stretch!

    Next up, we’ll move into the final section of this opening series, Part 5: Giving You The Tools To Bitcoin In Peace, which you can read < here >. Part 5 is where I layout why BitcoinInPeace.com will be your one-stop-shop for learning about, acquiring, and holding bitcoin and why this will be so important to you.

    The Learning Never Stops!

    If you want to continue your journey of learning about all things bitcoin with knowledgeable and helpful people who love to be of service to others, I highly recommend my bitcoin MeetUp, “Bitcoin, Huntsville, Crypto, & Coffee” which you can find here .  We meet two times every month online to discuss bitcoin and its impact on the world. You’ll be able to talk directly with others who are also on their personal bitcoin journey and ask them engaging questions.  We’re not selling anything. The only thing that we ask of you is to come to the table in good faith and be willing to DYOR – Do Your Own Research. We love newbies and the energy they bring!

    Donations

    If you found value in this article please feel free to donate via the following payment methods:

    CashApp:
    $JohnYoung357

    Venmo:
    @John-Young-359

    Bitcoin:
    Bc1qay7mwv6zfepgx8jarw9jhmera660g4f0k4ukv7

    End Notes, References, & Citations

    [1] “the governing and the governed”, “the ruling and the ruled”

    I adapted the phrases, “the governing and the governed” and, “the ruling and the ruled” from the article “America’s Ruling Class: And The Perils Of Revolution” by Angelo Codevilla, July 16, 2010.
    This article by Angelo Codevilla is really well done and brings a cogent perspective to the table. Overall, Mr. Codevilla demonstrates that an antagonistic environment has developed over the past few decade between what he calls “the ruling class and the country class”. It is this antagonism which has defined our culture and politics in the U.S. (and much of the West in general).

    [2] Michael Saylor’s reference to Galt’s Gulch

    Acknowledgements to Michael Saylor, of the company “Strategy”, for conceiving of the idea that bitcoin is “Galt’s Gulch“. You can see the transcript of his reference to Galt’s Gulch here and the video here.

    [3] Terrain feature: Summit

    Definition of Summit: Highest point of a hill or mountain.

    I specifically chose the terrain feature of a summit as many staunch bitcoin advocates consider bitcoin to be the apex predator form of money and the most pristine asset ever devised.

    [4] The European Renaissance

    We briefly covered the European Renaissance here.

    [5] The Mona Lisa

    Brave search engine summary: “Mona Lisa summary
    The Mona Lisa is a half-length portrait painting by the Italian artist Leonardo da Vinci, widely regarded as an archetypal masterpiece of the Italian Renaissance. It is traditionally believed to depict Lisa del Giocondo, the wife of Florentine silk merchant Francesco del Giocondo, although her likeness remains uncertain. The painting, created in oil on a poplar panel, measures 77 cm × 53 cm (30 in × 21 in) and was likely begun around 1503, with Leonardo possibly continuing to work on it until 1517 or even later. It is now housed in the Louvre Museum in Paris, where it has been a permanent part of the collection since 1797.
    The painting is renowned for its novel qualities, including the subject’s enigmatic expression, the monumentality of the composition, the subtle modelling of forms through the sfumato technique, and the atmospheric illusionism of the landscape background. The sitter is portrayed in a three-quarter profile, seated in a loggia with a vast, imagined landscape receding into distant mountains, winding paths, and a bridge, which some scholars believe may be the ancient Romito di Laterina bridge near Arezzo. Leonardo’s use of sfumato creates an ambiguous mood, particularly in the corners of the mouth and eyes, contributing to the painting’s enduring mystery.
    The title “
    Mona Lisa” derives from the Italian “Monna Lisa,” a polite form of address meaning “My Lady Lisa,” while the Italian title “La Gioconda” means “the jocund one” or “the happy one,” a pun on the feminine form of Lisa’s married name, Giocondo. The identification of Lisa del Giocondo as the sitter is primarily based on the 16th-century account of art historian Giorgio Vasari, and this was confirmed in 2005 by a marginal note in a 1477 printing of Cicero, written by Leonardo’s contemporary Agostino Vespucci, stating Leonardo was working on a portrait of Lisa del Giocondo in October 1503. Despite this, alternative theories have proposed other subjects, including Isabella d’Este, Cecilia Gallerani, and even Leonardo himself.
    The Mona Lisa’s global fame is partly attributed to its 1911 theft by Vincenzo Peruggia, which generated unprecedented publicity and cemented its status as a cultural icon. The painting has been the subject of numerous cultural depictions, including films, songs, and parodies, and is estimated to be worth over $800 million today, though it is considered priceless and not for sale. It is one of the most visited artworks in the world, with over 80% of Louvre visitors coming specifically to see it. The painting’s enduring appeal lies in its combination of artistic mastery, historical significance, and the enduring mystery surrounding its subject and expression.

    [6] Notre Dame

    Brave search engine summary: “Notre Dame summary
    Notre-Dame de Paris, often referred to simply as “Notre-Dame“, is a medieval Catholic cathedral located on the Île de la Cité in the 4th arrondissement of Paris, France. Dedicated to the Virgin Mary (“Our Lady“), it is considered one of the finest examples of French Gothic architecture and stands as a symbol of both the city of Paris and the French nation. The cathedral was initiated by Bishop Maurice de Sully in 1163, with the laying of the cornerstone in the presence of King Louis VII and Pope Alexander III. Construction began on the site of earlier religious structures, including a Gallo-Roman temple dedicated to Jupiter and a Romanesque basilica known as the Cathedral of Saint Étienne.
    The cathedral’s construction spanned nearly two centuries, from 1163 to 1345, with major phases including the completion of the choir by 1182, the nave by 1250, and the towers around 1250.
    It features pioneering Gothic elements such as rib vaults, flying buttresses, and large rose windows, with its three great rose windows retaining their 13th-century glass. The cathedral’s interior is 130 meters long and 48 meters wide, with a nave height of 35 meters. The original spire was removed in the 18th century due to instability, and a new, taller spire was added during the 19th-century restoration led by Eugène Viollet-le-Duc.
    Notre-Dame has witnessed numerous significant historical events, including the coronation of Napoleon Bonaparte in 1804, the funerals of French presidents, and the Liberation of Paris in 1944.
    The 1831 publication of Victor Hugo’s novel Notre-Dame de Paris (The Hunchback of Notre-Dame) played a crucial role in inspiring the 19th-century restoration. The cathedral suffered extensive damage during the French Revolution, when it was converted into a Temple of Reason and later a Temple of the Supreme Being. It was restored to the Catholic Church in 1801 through the Concordat of 1801.
    A devastating fire broke out on April 15, 2019, destroying the roof and the 19th-century spire, which had been added by Viollet-le-Duc.
    The cathedral was closed for extensive reconstruction, which began in 2021 and was completed in 2024. It officially reopened to the public on December 7, 2024, with the return of the revered Crown of Thorns relic on December 13, 2024. The restoration project, estimated to cost over €700 million, involved hundreds of craftsmen and was supported by global donations. The cathedral remains a major cultural and religious landmark, attracting millions of visitors annually.

    [7] The First Age Of Enlightenment

    We briefly covered the European “Age Of Enlightenmenthere. My thoughts on calling the European “Age Of Enlightenment” the “First Age Of Enlightenment” can be found here.

    [8] Exploration of the New World

    Brave search engine summary: “Exploration of the New World
    The exploration of the New World refers to the period of European exploration and colonization of the Americas from the late 15th century through the early 17th century, marking a transformative era in global history. This age, also known as the Age of Discovery, began with Christopher Columbus’s 1492 voyage, which led to the accidental discovery of the Americas by Europeans and initiated a wave of exploration, conquest, and colonization by major powers like Spain, Portugal, France, and England. The exploration fundamentally reshaped global trade networks through the Columbian Exchange, integrated the Americas into a world economy, and led to profound demographic, ecological, and cultural changes, often with devastating consequences for indigenous populations.

    • The era was driven by the “three G’s”: gold (economic gain through trade and resources like silver and sugar), God (religious conversion), and glory (national prestige and territorial expansion).
    • Key explorers included Christopher Columbus, whose voyages opened the door to the Americas; Amerigo Vespucci, who concluded the lands were a “New World” distinct from Asia and whose name became associated with the continent ; Ferdinand Magellan, whose expedition proved the New World was separate from Asia and circumnavigated the globe ; and conquistadors like Hernán Cortés and Francisco Pizarro, who conquered the Aztec and Inca Empires, respectively.
    • The exploration led to the establishment of vast colonial empires, intense competition among European powers, and the creation of treaties like the Treaty of Tordesillas (1494) to divide newly discovered lands.
    • The long-term impacts were profound, including the transformation of global trade, the forced migration of enslaved Africans, the introduction of new crops and animals to both hemispheres, and the catastrophic decline of indigenous populations due to disease, warfare, and displacement.”

    [9] Florence issuing the florin

    We briefly covered Florence issuing the florin here.

    [10] “The First Age of Enlightenment

    My thoughts on calling the European “Age Of Enlightenment” the “First Age Of Enlightenment” can be found here.

    [11] Milton Friedman’s book “Capitalism & Freedom

    We briefly discussed in a previous article, here, we cover the book “Capitalism & Freedom” here as well as its importance to the cause of individual liberty.

  • Bitcoin’s Impact On The World, Pt. 4.2 – Predictors Of Prosperity

    Previously

    In the previous article, here , we revisited our initial three questions which inquired about the means by which governments act far beyond their sole legitimate scope of protecting individual liberties.
    Now, let’s take a look at three major factors that we can use to predict with reasonable accuracy the effects of bitcoin on the world – cypherpunks, Austrian School economists, and hard money in history.

    Allegorical Anarchists

    In order to forecast properly how bitcoin will affect the world, I think it is necessary to understand the intent of those who had a part in its creation, directly and indirectly.
    There is a serious and notable (though mostly unheard of) movement called “cypherpunk” that has been around for almost as long as the internet itself. [1] In short, a cypherpunk is a devout believer of and staunch advocate for individual liberty by way of decentralization of power for the purpose of moving away from highly centralized power.  One of the primary means by which cypherpunks implement this movement is software built on cryptography [2] which is the study and application of math and computer science to keep communications private and secure.
    I recommend everyone take 5 minutes to read “The Crypto Anarchist Manifestohere.  For those who want the TL/DR (“too long, didn’t read“):

    We no longer need the coercive force of government to defend our
    rights (since the state always tilts towards tyranny), nor do we ask
    for permission to do so.  Instead, we will do it ourselves and,
    in the course of doing so, enable everyone to protect their
    rights, independent of the intentions and negligence of the state.

    Author’s Note: This is my summary and could be wrong. Any errors of interpretation are mine and mine alone and should not be attributed to anyone else.

    As cypherpunks will usually point out, the state always works slowly and under the radar on its quest for power.  The cypherpunk movement takes the same tack; cypherpunks also work without fanfare, preferring to remain behind the scenes so as not to draw attention to themselves nor their efforts.
    I think all of us can take a page out of the playbooks of both the state and the cypherpunks; we will work slowly, surreptitiously, and steadily to achieve our aim of fostering individual liberty.

    Predictors Of Prosperity, Protectors Of Private Property

    We have two very good examples of cogent and respected economists who predicted the advent of bitcoin (without knowing exactly what the name would be nor how it would work).
    One of those men was Frederick Hayek.  I am a huge fan of Mr. Hayek as he is considered one of the preeminent Austrian School economists of the 20th century. [3] In videos, here and here, he predicted the advent of bitcoin in 1984 with this quote:

    I don’t believe we shall ever have a good money again before
    we take the thing out of the hands of government,
    that is, we can’t take it violently out of the hands of
    government, all we can do is by some sly roundabout
    way introduce something that they can’t stop.
    F.A. Hayek, 1984 

    Bitcoin is that “something” that Hayek, Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, and a legion of other Austrian economists have been waiting for (and, in some instances, actually predicted).
    Fifteen years later, Milton Friedman predicted bitcoin in 1999.  You can see the video here and read about it here. [6]
    Much like the cypherpunks of today, Friedman and the Austrian economists understood keenly the need to work surreptitiously, behind the scenes, in order to implement a form of hard money that would be completely separate from the state.

    The Ultimate Effects Of A Hard Money Standard Throughout History

    It’s OK for use to be completely honest and admit that we have never seen the world on a “bitcoin standard”. [7] Thus, unlike gold, we do not have any direct experience with nor history of bitcoin as the world’s reserve currency.  But, we have seen periods in history when we have come close to achieving this ideal state.
    Thus, to forecast with reasonable accuracy, the best that we can do is use both first principles of human action as well as human history for applying known patterns.  These first principles can be employed to forecast what it would take to adopt a global bitcoin standard and to consider what happens when we have a hard money standard with the world’s first true form of money.  We can look back through history at times when we had hard money standards and the resulting net effects on those societies.

    Historical Note: In a previous article, here, we covered at a high level instances throughout history where countries employed a hard money standard. As a consequence of using dependable money, they thrived and became the preeminent powers of their time.

    Fortunately for us, we have sufficient examples in human history where we can observe what happened on a hard money standard and the fundamental reasons why a hard money standard always works so well:

    • The Ancient Roman Empire, circa 300 BC to 337 CE [8]
    • The Byzantine Empire, 395 CE to 1453 CE [9]
    • Renaissance Europe, circa 12th century and circa 12th century CE to 16th century CE [10] and the [First] Age Of Enlightenment, circa late 17th century CE to early 19th century CE [11] [12] [13]
    • The global Gold Standard, “La Belle Epoque“, 1814 CE – 1914 CE [14]

    Each of these major eras (and their resulting accomplishments) could only happen because of the hard money standards which were adopted during those periods.
    Their respective hard money standards (along with the other three civilizational pillars of the rule of law, written language, and civics) are what enabled and promoted savings, risk-taking, investing, innovation, technological change, and ubiquitous prosperity. [15]
    Conversely, we also can see the net societal and cultural effects when those states transitioned from a hard money standard to a soft money standard.  They stifled economic prosperity, could not defend their borders and citizens from outside aggressors, grew their bureaucracies to parasitic levels, subjugated the citizenry, and eventually collapsed.  Abandoning the very thing that brought about societal success in the first place (a form of money which naturally and passively constrained the powers of the government), is what typically causes a country’s ultimate demise.
    As you have probably surmised by what has been presented in this entire series, throughout history, we have seen the effects of good money and bad money on cultures and countries.  They are the opposite yet equally powerful forces and effects:

    1. Fiat currency is a de-civilizing force because it forces us to think only of today and punishes us for saving for the future.
      • I know that this dollar will be worth less tomorrow than today.  So, I should spend it now instead of holding it to invest for the future.
    2. Hard money is a civilizing force because it motivates and rewards us to think of and invest in the future by delaying our immediate gratification of today.
      • I know this bitcoin will be worth more tomorrow than today.  So, I should save it for the future rather than spend it now.

    From this, we have two chief revelations:

    1. The four pillars of civilization (hard money, written language, the rule of law, and civics) are all psycho-technologies.
    2. Using a hard money standard, one of the four pillars, is what enables the other three pillars to take hold, stabilize, and propel a society into equity, durability, prosperity, and longevity.

    What an eye opener!  Merely choosing the form of money which is fair and impartial to all participants and not subject to the whims of a select few is the deciding factor for societal success!

    Next Steps

    In the next article, here, we will tie all of this together and discuss what a “bitcoin standard” is, how that eventually leads to a separation of money and state, and will promote individual liberty on a scale never before experienced.

    The Learning Never Stops!

    If you want to continue your journey of learning about all things bitcoin with knowledgeable and helpful people who love to be of service to others, I highly recommend my bitcoin MeetUp, “Bitcoin, Huntsville, Crypto, & Coffee” which you can find here .  We meet two times every month online to discuss bitcoin and its impact on the world. You’ll be able to talk directly with others who are also on their personal bitcoin journey and ask them engaging questions.  We’re not selling anything. The only thing that we ask of you is to come to the table in good faith and be willing to DYOR – Do Your Own Research. We love newbies and the energy they bring!

    Donations

    If you found value in this article please feel free to donate via the following payment methods:

    CashApp:
    $JohnYoung357

    Venmo:
    @John-Young-359

    Bitcoin:
    Bc1qay7mwv6zfepgx8jarw9jhmera660g4f0k4ukv7

    End Notes, References, & Citations

    [1] Cypherpunk

    Brave search engine summary “cypherpunk summary
    Cypherpunk Summary
    Cypherpunks are individuals and organizations who use computer code and cryptography technology to preserve privacy and anonymity. The movement originated in the late 1980s and gained traction with the establishment of the ‘Cypherpunks‘ electronic mailing list in 1992, where activists, technologists, and cryptographers discussed strategies to enhance individual privacy and resist state or corporate surveillance. The cypherpunk movement is deeply libertarian, advocating for decentralization, individual autonomy, and freedom from centralized authority. They believe privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age and that encryption is a private act that cannot be destroyed or shut down by regulations.
    The cypherpunk movement has contributed to the development of technologies that have reshaped global finance, communication, and privacy practices, such as Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, which embody cypherpunk ideals of decentralized and censorship-resistant money.
    Cypherpunks have also created systems that champion anonymity by using cryptography and decentralized technology, including the Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) program for secure data communication, the Tor project for private web browsing, and Hashcash, an anonymous transaction system used to limit spam emails and cyberattacks.

    • Philip Zimmermann: Creator of Pretty Good Privacy (PGP), a widely used email encryption software.
    • Julian Assange: Founder of WikiLeaks, a media organization known for publishing classified government documents.
    • Nicholas Szabo: Computer scientist credited with introducing the concept of smart contracts, widely used in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications and Web3 programs.
    • Satoshi Nakamoto: Pseudonymous founder of Bitcoin, the most valuable cryptocurrency network in the world.
    • Zooko Wilcox: Co-founder of Zcash, a privacy-preserving cryptocurrency.
    • Adam Back: British cryptographer who created Hashcash, used in Bitcoin mining.
    • Fiatjaf: Pseudonymous founder of Nostr, an open protocol for building censorship-resistant social media applications.

    The cypherpunk movement has had a lasting impact on debates around digital rights, surveillance, and personal freedoms in the 21st century.

    Cypherpunk
    A cypherpunk is one who advocates the widespread use of strong cryptography and privacy-enhancing technologies as a means of effecting social and political change. The cypherpunk movement originated in the late 1980s and gained traction with the establishment of the ‘Cypherpunks‘ electronic mailing list in 1992, where informal groups of activists, technologists, and cryptographers discussed strategies to enhance individual privacy and resist state or corporate surveillance. Deeply libertarian in philosophy, the movement is rooted in principles of decentralization, individual autonomy, and freedom from centralized authority. Its influence on society extends to the development of technologies that have reshaped global finance, communication, and privacy practices, such as the creation of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, which embody cypherpunk ideals of decentralized and censorship-resistant money.
    The movement has also contributed to the mainstreaming of encryption in everyday technologies, such as secure messaging apps and privacy-focused web browsers. The cypherpunk ethos has had a lasting impact on debates around digital rights, surveillance, and personal freedoms in the 21st century. The movement has been active since at least 1990 and continues to inspire initiatives aimed at fostering a more private and secure digital world.

    A Cypherpunk’s Manifesto
    [Excerpt]  “Privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age. Privacy is not secrecy. A private matter is something one doesn’t want the whole world to know, but a secret matter is something one doesn’t want anybody to know. Privacy is the power to selectively reveal oneself to the world.

    [2] Cryptography

    Brave search engine summary “What is cryptography
    What is Cryptography
    Cryptography is the practice of securing communication in the presence of outside third parties, protecting sensitive information from unauthorized access by transforming data into an unreadable form without an encryption key.
    It ensures confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity of data, making it a fundamental component of modern information security. Cryptography involves using algorithms, hashes, and signatures to encrypt and decrypt data, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access and read encrypted information.

    Cryptography
    Cryptography, or cryptology (from Ancient Greek: κρυπτός, romanized: kryptós “hidden, secret”; and γράφειν graphein, “to write”, or -λογία -logia, “study”, respectively), is the practice and study of techniques for secure communication in the presence of adversarial behavior. More generally, cryptography is about constructing and analyzing protocols that prevent third parties or the public from reading private messages. Modern cryptography exists at the intersection of the disciplines of mathematics, computer science, information security, electrical engineering, digital signal processing, physics, and others. Core concepts related to information security (data confidentiality, data integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation) are also central to cryptography. Practical applications of cryptography include electronic commerce, chip-based payment cards, digital currencies, computer passwords, and military communications.

    What is Cryptography?
    Cryptography is the practice of developing and using coded algorithms to protect and obscure transmitted information so that it may only be read by those with the permission and ability to decrypt it. Put differently, cryptography obscures communications so that unauthorized parties are unable to access them.

    [3] The Austrian School of economics

    Brave search engine summary “Chicago school of economics versus Austrian school of economics
    Chicago vs Austrian Economics
    The Chicago School of Economics and the Austrian School of Economics are two prominent free-market schools of thought with distinct methodological and theoretical differences.
    Chicago School of Economics: This school, associated with the University of Chicago, emphasizes empirical analysis, mathematical modeling, and the role of market mechanisms. Key figures include Milton Friedman and George Stigler. The Chicago School generally supports the use of monetary policy to stabilize the economy and often advocates for a central bank to manage the money supply. They believe in the efficiency of markets and the rationality of economic actors, often subscribing to the efficient markets hypothesis (EMH). The Chicago School has been influential in policy, particularly in areas like deregulation and privatization.
    Austrian School of Economics: Originating in Vienna, the Austrian School emphasizes methodological individualism, the subjective theory of value, and a more qualitative approach to economics. Key figures include Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich Hayek, and Murray Rothbard. Austrians reject the use of mathematical models and econometrics, preferring verbal and logical reasoning. They focus on the role of entrepreneurship, the structure of capital, and the business cycle, often attributing economic downturns to government intervention, particularly in monetary policy. Austrians generally advocate for the abolition of central banks and a return to a gold standard or free banking.

    [6] Milton Friedman and Chicago School of economics

    Milton Friedman was not an Austrian School economist (he would be considered “Chicago School” [3]), but was still a staunch proponent of individual liberty and limited government. You can read about his thoughts on individual liberty in his seminal book, “Capitalism & Freedom

    [7] Hyper-bitcoinization

    In the bitcoin space, the state of bitcoin as the world’s monetary standard is called “hyper-bitcoinization“.

    [8] The Ancient Roman Empire’s money

    Brave search engine summary “ancient roman empire money
    Ancient Roman Empire Money
    Ancient Roman money underwent significant changes throughout the empire’s history. Initially, the Roman economy used bronze weights called aes rude as a form of currency, which could be used both as coinage and melted down for tools and objects.
    Coinage proper was introduced around 300 BC, with the first coins produced in Italy in the late 4th century BC.  The early Roman currency consisted of gold, silver, bronze, orichalcum, and copper coins.
    The aureus was the basic gold monetary unit of ancient Rome, equivalent to 25 silver denarii, and a denarius was worth 10 bronze asses.
    The denarius was a silver coin that became a significant currency in the Roman world, and its influence can be seen in the modern words for money in many languages, such as “denaro” in Italian and “dinero” in Spanish.
    During the Roman Empire, the image of the emperor became a central feature on coins, serving as propaganda and a means of disseminating the emperor’s image throughout the empire.
    This practice continued from the time of Julius Caesar and was maintained even after his assassination.
    In the late Empire, the aureus was replaced by the solidus, a gold coin introduced by Constantine in 337 AD.
    The solidus was valued at 275,000 denarii initially, but by 356 AD, its value had increased to 4,600,000 denarii, reflecting the rampant inflation of the period.
    Roman currency was widely used throughout western Eurasia and northern Africa from classical times into the Middle Ages, and it served as a model for the currencies of the Muslim caliphates and European states during the Middle Ages and the Modern Era.

    • Aureus: Basic gold monetary unit of ancient Rome, equivalent to 25 silver denarii.
    • Denarius: Silver coin that became a significant currency in the Roman world, influencing modern words for money in many languages.
    • Solidus: Gold coin introduced by Constantine in 337 AD, replacing the aureus.

    The debasement of Roman currency, particularly in silver and gold content, was a long-term issue that began as the empire stopped expanding and faced economic challenges.
    This debasement was gradual and eventually led to the need for price controls under Emperor Diocletian, who ruled from 284 to 305 AD.

    History of Hard Money: The Denarius and the Fall of Rome
    Money and the Fall of Rome
    If ever there was an unbreakable civilization, the Romans held the title. Roman armies conquered 5 million square kilometers of territory and 20% of the earth’s population; Roman roads connected trade routes across Europe, Africa, and Asia; Roman art, literature, and philosophy layed the groundwork for modern Western culture.
    And yet, Rome fell apart. Historians have debated the causes of Rome’s collapse for centuries, pointing to religious turmoil, erosion of traditional Roman values, incursions by Germanic tribes, and political corruption. However, at the heart of Rome’s decline lies a singular, pervasive factor: its monetary system.

    Brave search engine summary “ancient roman empire hard money standard
    Roman Empire Hard Money
    The ancient Roman Empire initially adopted a hard money standard, primarily using gold and silver coins. The denarius, a silver coin, was introduced around 211 BC and became the dominant monetary unit, with a purity of 95% and a weight of 4.5 grams. This standard was crucial for the economic stability of the Roman Empire during its peak. However, over time, the purity of the denarius was gradually reduced, leading to economic instability and inflation. By the end of the Roman Empire, the silver content of the denarius had dropped to just 2%.
    Emperor Constantine restored some stability to the monetary system in the 4th century by introducing the solidus, a gold coin with a consistent precious metal content of 4.55 grams. This coin was used in the Byzantine Empire until the 10th century, long after the fall of Rome in the West.
    The use of hard money in Rome was significant because it was difficult to produce and inflate, which helped maintain economic stability. However, the gradual debasement of coins over centuries contributed to the economic and political decline of the Roman Empire.
    The Roman Empire’s monetary system also included bronze and copper coins, such as the sestertius and the ‘as’, which were used for smaller transactions. The aureus, a gold coin, was another important part of the Roman currency system, containing roughly twice the weight of precious metal as the denarius.
    Throughout the Empire’s history, the use of hard money was crucial for economic stability, but the eventual debasement of coins led to inflation and economic turmoil, contributing to the fall of the Roman Empire.

    [9] Byzantium and the Byzantine Empire

    Brave search engine summary “How long did the Byzantine empire last
    Byzantine Empire Duration
    The Byzantine Empire lasted for approximately 1,098 years, from 395 to 1453. It began as the eastern half of the Roman Empire after its division in 395 and continued to exist even after the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476. The empire finally fell to the Ottoman Turks in 1453 when Constantinople was captured.

    Brave search engine summary “What money did the byzantine empire use
    Byzantine Empire Currency
    The Byzantine Empire used mainly gold solidi and hyperpyra, along with a variety of bronze coins. The solidus, also known as the nomisma, was the primary gold coin and was renowned for its purity and stability. It was the preferred coin for international trade and was in circulation for over 700 years.
    Throughout its history, the Byzantine Empire also issued silver and copper coins. Silver coins included the hexagramma and the miliaresion, while bronze coins were initially known as the nummus and later as the follis.
    The Byzantine economy was self-sufficient and thrived due to the use of these coins, which facilitated trade and taxation.

    Brave search engine summary “Byzantium and the Bezant
    Byzantium and the Bezant
    Byzantium, the ancient Greek city that later became Constantinople and is now Istanbul, was the capital of the Byzantine Empire and the source of the gold coin known as the bezant. The term bezant comes from the Greek name Byzantion, which was the ancient name of Constantinople. In Western Europe, the gold coins produced by the Byzantine Empire were commonly called bezants, derived from Byzantium.
    The Byzantine solidus, also known as the nomisma, was the basic unit of the Byzantine monetary system and was valued at 1/72 of a Roman pound of gold, weighing approximately 4.5 grams and being 24 karats pure.
    The solidus was widely used in international trade and enjoyed prestige throughout the known world at the time, from North Africa to China.
    The term bezant was also used in heraldry to refer to a roundel of gold color, symbolizing the high quality and purity of the Byzantine gold coins.
    Byzantine coinage was issued under strict imperial control and was the most stable currency of the Middle Ages, making the gold solidus the preferred coin for international trade.
    The Byzantine Empire operated several mints, with the main one located in Constantinople. However, most provincial mints were closed or lost to Arab Muslim invasions in the Mediterranean region by the mid-7th century onwards.
    The purity of the gold solidus gradually decreased over time, with the fineness dropping from 24 karats during the reign of Constantine IX to as low as 8 carats during the reign of Nicephorus III. Under Alexius I Comnenus, the debased solidus was discontinued, and a new gold coinage of higher fineness, known as the hyperpyron, was established.
    The term bezant was also used to describe gold dinars produced by Islamic governments and the gold coins minted in the Kingdom of Jerusalem and County of Tripoli, which were modeled on the Fatimid dinar.
    Byzantium, as a term, was applied to the gold Byzantine coinage from the 9th century onwards, and the English usage, derived from Old French besan, dates back to the 12th century.

    Bezant
    In the Middle Ages, the term bezant (Old French: besant, from Latin bizantius aureus) was used in Western Europe to describe several gold coins of the east, all derived ultimately from the Roman solidus. The word itself comes from the Greek Byzantion, the ancient name of Constantinople, the capital of the Byzantine Empire.
    The original “
    bezants” were the gold coins produced by the government of the Byzantine Empire, first the nomisma and from the 11th century the hyperpyron. Later, the term was used to cover the gold dinars produced by Islamic governments. In turn, the gold coins minted in the Kingdom of Jerusalem and County of Tripoli were termed “Saracen bezants” (besantius saracenatus), or “fake dinars” (dīnār ṣūrī), since they were modelled on the Fatimid dinar. A completely different electrum coin based on Byzantine trachea was minted in the Kingdom of Cyprus and called the “white bezant“.
    The term bezant in reference to coins is common in sources from the 10th through 13th centuries. Thereafter, it was mainly employed as a money of account and in literary and heraldic contexts.

    Byzantine Coinage
    Byzantine currency, money used in the Eastern Roman Empire after the fall of the West, consisted of mainly two types of coins: gold solidi and hyperpyra and a variety of clearly valued bronze coins. By the 15th century, the currency was issued only in debased silver stavrata and minor copper coins with no gold issue.[1] The Byzantine Empire established and operated several mints throughout its history. Aside from the main metropolitan mint in the capital, Constantinople, a varying number of provincial mints were also established in other urban centres, especially during the 6th century.
    Most provincial mints except for Syracuse were closed or lost to Arab Muslim invasions in the Mediterranean Region by the mid-7th century onwards. After the loss of Syracuse in 878, Constantinople became the sole mint for gold and silver coinage until the late 11th century, when major provincial mints began to re-appear. Many mints, both imperial and, as the Byzantine Empire fragmented, belonging to autonomous local rulers, were operated in the 12th to 14th centuries. Constantinople and Trebizond, capital of the independent Empire of Trebizond (1204–1461), survived until the invasion of Anatolia by the Ottoman Turks in the mid-15th century.

    [10] Renaissance Europe

    Brave search engine summary “The Renaissance
    The Renaissance was a period of ‘rebirth‘ in arts, science, and culture, typically thought to have originated in Italy and lasted from around the 14th to the 17th century. It marked the transition from the Middle Ages to modernity and was characterized by a revival of classical antiquity’s ideas and achievements. This period saw significant advancements in various fields, including art, architecture, politics, literature, exploration, and science. The term ‘Renaissance‘ means “rebirth” in French and first appeared in Giorgio Vasari’s ‘Lives of the Artists‘ around 1550. The Renaissance began in the Republic of Florence and later spread to the rest of Italy and throughout Europe. It is generally considered to have ended in Italy with the fall of Rome in 1527 and was eclipsed by the Reformation and Counter-Reformation elsewhere in Europe by the end of the 16th century.

    Renaissance
    The was a period of ‘rebirth‘ in arts, science, and culture, typically thought to have originated in Italy and lasted from around the 14th to the 17th century. It marked the transition from the Middle Ages to modernity and was characterized by a revival of classical antiquity’s ideas and achievements. This period saw significant advancements in various fields, including art, architecture, politics, literature, exploration, and science. The term ‘Renaissance‘ means ‘rebirth‘ in French and first appeared in Giorgio Vasari’s ‘Lives of the Artists’ around 1550. The Renaissance began in the Republic of Florence and later spread to the rest of Italy and throughout Europe. It is generally considered to have ended in Italy with the fall of Rome in 1527 and was eclipsed by the Reformation and Counter-Reformation elsewhere in Europe by the end of the 16th century.

    Renaissance of the 12th century
    The Renaissance of the 12th century was a period of many changes at the outset of the High Middle Ages. It included social, political and economic transformations, and an intellectual revitalization of Western Europe with strong philosophical and scientific roots. These changes paved the way for later achievements such as the literary and artistic movement of the Italian Renaissance in the 15th century and the scientific developments of the 17th century.

    Italian Renaissance
    The Italian Renaissance (Italian: Rinascimento [rinaʃʃiˈmento]) was a period in Italian history between the 14th and 16th centuries. The period is known for the initial development of the broader Renaissance culture that spread across Western Europe and marked the transition from the Middle Ages to modernity. Proponents of a “long Renaissance” argue that it started around the year 1300 and lasted until about 1600. In some fields, a Proto-Renaissance, beginning around 1250, is typically accepted. The French word renaissance (corresponding to rinascimento in Italian) means ‘rebirth’, and defines the period as one of cultural revival and renewed interest in classical antiquity after the centuries during what Renaissance humanists labelled as the ‘Dark Ages‘. The Italian Renaissance historian Giorgio Vasari used the term rinascita (‘rebirth‘) in his Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects in 1550, but the concept became widespread only in the 19th century, after the work of scholars such as Jules Michelet and Jacob Burckhardt.

    [11] The Age of Enlightenment

    Age of Enlightenment
    The Age of Enlightenment (also the Age of Reason and the Enlightenment) was an intellectual and philosophical movement taking place in Europe from the late 17th century to the early 19th century. The Enlightenment, which valued knowledge gained through rationalism and empiricism, was concerned with a range of social ideas and political ideals such as natural law, liberty, and progress, toleration and fraternity, constitutional government, and the formal separation of church and state.
    The Enlightenment was preceded by and overlapped the Scientific Revolution, which included the work of Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei, Francis Bacon, Pierre Gassendi, Christiaan Huygens and Isaac Newton, among others, as well as the rationalist philosophy of Descartes, Hobbes, Spinoza, Leibniz, and John Locke. The dating of the period of the beginning of the Enlightenment can be attributed to the publication of René Descartes’ Discourse on the Method in 1637, with his method of systematically disbelieving everything unless there was a well-founded reason for accepting it, and featuring his famous dictum, Cogito, ergo sum (‘I think, therefore I am‘). Others cite the publication of Isaac Newton’s Principia Mathematica (1687) as the culmination of the Scientific Revolution and the beginning of the Enlightenment. European historians traditionally dated its beginning with the death of Louis XIV of France in 1715 and its end with the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789. Many historians now date the end of the Enlightenment as the start of the 19th century, with the latest proposed year being the death of Immanuel Kant in 1804.

    [12] The Florin of Florence

    Brave search engine for “florin money
    Florin Money
    The florin is a type of coin that has a rich history and has been used in various forms across different countries. In Italy, the Florentine florin was a gold coin minted from 1252 to 1533, known for its stability and widespread acceptance in trade across Europe. It was made of 24-carat gold and weighed 3.5 grams, with a purchasing power that could range from approximately 140 to 1,000 modern US dollars depending on the social context and perspective.
    In Great Britain, the florin was introduced as part of an experiment in decimalisation in 1849, and it was a silver coin worth two shillings or one-tenth of a pound. This British florin was demonetised in 1993, having circulated alongside the ten-pence piece for a quarter of a century.
    The term ‘florin‘ was also adopted in other countries, such as the Dutch guilder, which is symbolized as Fl. or ƒ, meaning florijn (florin).
    The Florentine florin played a significant role in the economic history of Europe, influencing the design and value of coins in other countries and serving as a standard for comparing values between late medieval currencies.

    Florin
    The Florentine florin was a gold coin (in Italian Fiorino d’oro) struck from 1252 to 1533 with no significant change in its design or metal content standard during that time.
    It had 54 grains (3.499 grams, 0.1125 troy ounces) of nominally pure or ‘fine’ gold with a purchasing power difficult to estimate (and variable) but ranging according to social grouping and perspective from approximately 140 to 1,000 modern US dollars. The name of the coin comes from the Giglio bottonato (it), the floral emblem of the city, which is represented at the head of the coin.

    [13] The “First Age Of Enlightenment

    For the purpose of this blog, I am using the term the “First Age of Enlightenment“.  I will elaborate on this in later articles. Suffice it to say that I believe that bitcoin will usher in our Second Age of Enlightenment.

    [14] The Gold Standard

    Brave search engine summary “the gold standard summary
    The Gold Standard
    The term ‘gold standard’ originally refers to a monetary system where currency is convertible into a fixed quantity of gold or is freely convertible into gold at a fixed price. This system was first adopted in Britain in 1821 and was widely implemented by other nations in the 1870s. It ended with the outbreak of World War I in 1914 and was reestablished in 1928. However, due to the relative scarcity of gold, most nations adopted a gold-exchange standard, which collapsed during the Great Depression. The U.S. set a minimum dollar price for gold in 1971, leading to the abandonment of the gold standard.

    Note of Correction:  The gold standard was first started in France in 1814 with the minting of the French franc, not Great Britain in 1821.  Credit to “The Bitcoin Standard” by Saifedean Ammous for pointing this out on page 35 of his book.

    Brave search engine summary “monetary gold standard
    Gold Standard Definition
    A gold standard is a monetary system where the standard economic unit of account is based on a fixed quantity of gold.
    Historically, the gold standard was the basis for the international monetary system from the 1870s to the early 1920s, and again from the late 1920s to 1932, as well as from 1944 until 1971 when the United States unilaterally terminated convertibility of the US dollar to gold, effectively ending the Bretton Woods system.
    Under a gold standard, the government’s currency is fixed and may be freely converted into gold.
    In this system, the government links the value of its paper money to a stock of gold reserves. For example, in the United States in the early 20th century, the definition of a dollar was taken to mean one-twentieth of an ounce of gold, so it would take 20 dollar bills to purchase one ounce of gold.
    However, the gold standard had several drawbacks. It restricted a government’s ability to manage its economy by printing or minting new currency to boost economic growth, since gold is a finite resource.
    Additionally, maintaining a fixed exchange rate between gold and silver, as in the bimetallic standard, was difficult and caused economic instability and volatility in commodities trading.

    Gold Standard
    A gold standard is a monetary system in which the standard economic unit of account is based on a fixed quantity of gold. The gold standard was the basis for the international monetary system from the 1870s to the early 1920s, and from the late 1920s to 1932 as well as from 1944 until 1971 when the United States unilaterally terminated convertibility of the US dollar to gold, effectively ending the Bretton Woods system. Many states nonetheless hold substantial gold reserves.

    [15] The Bitcoin Standard

    Credit needs to be given to the author and Austrian School economist, Saifedean Ammous, and his two seminal works “The Bitcoin Standard” and “The Fiat Standard“.  I cannot recommend these books highly enough.
    Mr. Ammous is probably the first true economist not just to embrace bitcoin but actually to write, not one but, two books on bitcoin and its effects on our world.  Both books provide proper historical, economic, and sociological contexts for why a hard money standard is necessary for true prosperity and that soft money (fiat currency) always leads to calamity and the rise of tyranny.
    If you have not read his books then you should probably do it as soon as possible.

    Full Disclosure:  I have no ties to Mr. Ammous nor do I benefit financially from promoting his books.  My promotion of Saifedean’s books is a part of making BitcoinInPeace.com a better blog for the readers.

  • Bitcoin’s Impact On The World, Pt. 4.1 – First Principles (Redux)

    Previously

    In Part 3 of this opening series, here , we looked at bitcoin and its demonstrable properties, attributes, and characteristics. We also concluded that these bitcoin properties line-up with the definition of dependable money, which we defined here .
    Now, we open up Part 4 of our opening series, “Bitcoin’s Impact On The World“. Part 4 is dedicated to tying together all of the previous articles so that we can forecast what bitcoin’s impact on the world will be once we have a true hard money standard (versus our current fiat currency standard). Overall, we deeply consider the ideas of naturally constrained governments which are only able to defend individual liberties, nothing more, nothing less.

    Looking Back To The Beginning

    At the very beginning of this opening series, I proffered three questions based upon first principles of civics and asked you to consider what your answer is to them. Those three questions were:

    • What are the air and the lifeblood of the U.S. gov’t which enables it to act far beyond its Constitutionally mandated scope?
    • What enables modern government the ability for them to engage in all long-term tyranny or authoritarianism?
    • What allows government to operate with complete impunity and a total lack of accountability to the people?

    By now, I’m sure that you can guess what my answer is – fiat currency (and, by extension, government-imposed debts). Based upon this opening series, I hope that you have come to the same conclusion.
    When the state has control of the money supply and monetary policy, it is able to extract financial value out of our wallets and bank accounts, corrupt our moral values and sense of ethics, and force all of us to pay for this corruption along the way.
    Even if we as individuals choose not to participate in a particular activity, such as toppling foreign countries, donating money to organizations which are anathema to our values, or forcing citizens to buy goods and services which they do not want, the state can use its power over the money supply do all of those things and use our hard work to make it happen contrary to our will.

    The Levers Of Power

    Since we’re already looking at first principles, let’s dig deep by asking a series of fundamental questions:

    What If…?

    • What if… the federal and national governments around the world could not inflate the money supply whenever they wanted?
    • What if… the state had to live on a budget the same as everyone else?
    • What if… every war had to be funded by the people directly (instead of via inflation)?
    • What if… departments, agencies, and bureaus were limited by the budgets that they were allocated and could not grow endlessly?
    • What if… politicians and bureaucrats did not have the dials, levers, and buttons of power afforded to them via fiat currencies?
    • What if… the state did not have unlimited power because it were naturally constrained by hard money?

    These are the questions that most have never considered previously because we had no alternative… until now.
    If you’re wondering what it would be like to remove the “power of the printer” from the politicians, bureaucrats, and technocrats, then wonder no more!

    We have bitcoin, a monetary system which completely
    removes the capricious, emotionally-driven,
    incompetent, and insidious decision-making power
    from both the elected and unelected few.

    Just like all psychotechnologies which promote individual liberty, Bitcoin pushes the power of self-sovereignty to where it belongs – with the common person. Bitcoin creates a truly level field where every single participant has equal voting, interacting, and economic power in this ecosystem. Everyone can participate equally and no one party has the ability to change the rules ad hoc, ad infinitum, ad nauseum. Much as gravity applies to everyone and everything equally, bitcoin’s rules apply ubiquitously, without distinction nor prejudice.

    The Composition Of U.S. Federalism – The Constitution

    The U.S. Constitution is based on this one principle stated with three words:

    Rules, not rulers.

    It does this by way of the dissolution of absolute power (which corrupts absolutely). [1] The Constitution did an amazing job of decentralizing power.  Even within the federal government, the Founding Fathers ensured that we have three co-equal branches of government for the purpose of decentralizing power.
    Per the 10th Amendment, powers not specifically granted (“enumerated”) to the Federal government are instead reserved to the individual states and the people. [2] The Founders knew that centralization of power is the only means by which the state can become draconian and authoritarian. In their attempt to maintain checked power, the Founders created federal structures which respected the concept of decentralization.
    The Founders knew that there would always be “scope creep“, [3] governments which naturally always want to acquire more and more power over the decades, slowly, gradually, imperceptibly.  In their efforts to bring that scope creep to a crawl, the Founders did an amazing job of constructing a system with well-defined goals and guardrails.
    The only thing that was missing was a monetary system which supported the Founders’ intent and goals. While I appreciate that the signers of the Constitution called out gold and silver within the text of our founding document, my only criticism is that they did not make federal requirements that only hard, dependable money could be used. [4]

    But, now we now have that monetary system
    which is dependable money.  We have bitcoin,
    the world’s first true form of money.

    For once, we have an actual commodity which is a representation of scarcity, where individuals and governments must economize and make decisions based upon value-orient priorities given limited resources.
    The entirety of this blog is to promote the monetary and fiscal exsanguination [5] of all contemporary governments to the point where the only thing they are capable of doing is defending the rights of its citizens, nothing more, nothing less.

    Next Steps

    In the next article, < here >, we will forecast bitcoin’s impact on the globe based upon first principles and historical examples. More specifically, we will examine the impact of removing obtrusive and intrusive governments from our lives.

    The Learning Never Stops!

    If you want to continue your journey of learning about all things bitcoin with knowledgeable and helpful people who love to be of service to others, I highly recommend my bitcoin MeetUp, “Bitcoin, Huntsville, Crypto, & Coffee” which you can find here .  We meet two times every month online to discuss bitcoin and its impact on the world. You’ll be able to talk directly with others who are also on their personal bitcoin journey and ask them engaging questions.  We’re not selling anything. The only thing that we ask of you is to come to the table in good faith and be willing to DYOR – Do Your Own Research. We love newbies and the energy they bring!

    Donations

    If you found value in this article please feel free to donate via the following payment methods:

    CashApp:
    $JohnYoung357

    Venmo:
    @John-Young-359

    Bitcoin:
    Bc1qay7mwv6zfepgx8jarw9jhmera660g4f0k4ukv7

    End Notes, References, & Citations

    [1] Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” — Lord Acton

    Brave search engine summary: “Absolute power corrupts absolutely quote“:
    Absolute Power Corrupts
    The quote
    ‘Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely‘ is attributed to the 19th-century British historian and politician Lord Acton, whose full name was John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton.
    He first articulated this idea in a letter written to Bishop Mandell Creighton in 1887, where he emphasized the moral dangers of unchecked authority, particularly within political and religious institutions. The quote underscores his belief that power, especially when concentrated, inevitably leads to moral degradation and tyranny. This principle has since become a foundational maxim in discussions about governance, liberty, and the necessity of checks and balances.

    [2] The 9th and 10th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution

    The 9th and 10th Amendments to the Constitution are a powerful combination. Together, they guarantee that even unidentified rights and powers need to stay with the several states and the people. This is the legal embodiment of the idea of decentralization, equal standing, and minimizing scope creep. [3]

    Ninth Amendment
    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

    Brave search engine summary: “9th amendment to the constitution
    9th Amendment
    The states that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. It was ratified on December 15, 1791, as part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment was introduced by James Madison to address concerns that listing specific rights might be interpreted as implying those were the only rights citizens possessed. It serves as a constitutional safety net, affirming that the Bill of Rights is not an exhaustive list of individual rights.
    The Ninth Amendment protects unenumerated rights—rights not explicitly listed in the Constitution. These rights are inherent and extend beyond the written text, ensuring that the government cannot restrict liberties simply because they are not named in the Constitution. The Supreme Court has invoked the Ninth Amendment to safeguard rights such as the right to privacy, the right to travel, the right to vote, and the right to make personal decisions about health care and one’s body. Landmark cases like Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) and Roe v. Wade (1973) relied on the Ninth Amendment to recognize the right to privacy as a fundamental unenumerated right.
    Despite its importance, the Ninth Amendment has been considered by some legal scholars as “forgotten” or “irrelevant” for much of U.S. history, with limited direct application in constitutional law until the 20th century. Its primary function is often seen as a rule of construction, meaning it instructs courts not to interpret the listed rights as an exclusive catalog, thereby preventing the government from assuming powers beyond those explicitly granted. Some argue it establishes a presumption of liberty, requiring the government to justify laws that restrict individual actions. Others view it as a general limitation on government power rather than a source of substantive rights. The amendment reflects a natural rights tradition, suggesting people possess more rights than any constitution could ever fully list.

    Tenth Amendment
    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

    Brave search engine summary: “10th amendment to the constitution“:
    10th Amendment
    The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified on December 15, 1791, as part of the Bill of Rights, establishes the principle of federalism by stating that powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. This amendment reinforces the idea that the federal government possesses only those powers explicitly granted by the Constitution, while all other powers are retained by the states or the people. The amendment was proposed to address concerns from Anti-Federalists who feared a powerful central government and was intended to clarify that the federal government’s authority is limited and enumerated.
    Although some legal scholars and the Supreme Court have described the Tenth Amendment as a “truism” or a “tautology,” meaning it merely restates that the federal government only has powers granted to it and retains nothing beyond those , it has played a significant role in constitutional interpretation. The Supreme Court has used the amendment to limit federal overreach, particularly in cases involving the commandeering of state governments. For example, in New York v. United States (1992), the Court ruled that Congress cannot force states to take title to low-level radioactive waste or assume liability for its disposal, as this violated the Tenth Amendment. Similarly, the Court has held that the federal government cannot compel states to enforce federal laws or to enact specific legislation.
    The Tenth Amendment is often cited in debates over states’ rights and the balance of power between state and federal governments. It underpins the concept of state sovereignty, allowing states to exercise general police powers—such as establishing police and fire departments, setting public health regulations, and managing emergency responses—unless prohibited by the Constitution. While the amendment’s text is simple, its interpretation has evolved, with the Supreme Court increasingly using it to impose limits on federal power, even when Congress is acting under its enumerated powers, such as under the Commerce Clause.

    [3] Scope creep

    “Scope Creep
    Scope creep (also called requirement creep, or kitchen sink syndrome) in project management is continuous or uncontrolled growth in a project’s scope, generally experienced after the project begins. This can occur when the scope of a project is not properly defined, documented, or controlled. It is generally considered harmful.

    [4] The Founders specifying gold and silver within the U.S. Constitution as the monetary base

    In fairness to the Founding Fathers, they placed provisions within the Constitution for gold and silver as the basis for a our monetary system. The Founders knew the value of a hard money standard. They had seen numerous examples throughout history where government had actively engaged in debasement of the money supply in order to maintain and acquire more power. Specific sections of the Constitution pertaining to gold and silver are as follows:

    Article I, Section 8:
    This section grants Congress the power to coin money and regulate its value.
    Text: “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures.

    Article I, Section 10:
    This section restricts states from coining money or issuing their own currency.
    Text: “No State shall … coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.

    [5] Exsanguination

    Exsanguination
    Exsanguination is the loss of blood from the circulatory system of a vertebrate, usually leading to death. The word comes from the Latin ‘
    sanguis‘, meaning blood, and the prefix ‘ex-‘, meaning ‘out of “.

    Exsanguination
    Exsanguination is defined as massive bleeding resulting in the loss of the entire body blood volume over 24 hours or half of the body’s blood volume over 3 hours, often due to vascular damage from injuries, particularly in unstable pelvic ring injuries.

  • Bitcoin: The Ultimate Freedom Accelerator, Pt. 3.3 – The Properties Of Bitcoin

    Previously

    In the previous post, here, we took a high-level look at bitcoin and its (verifiably) fundamental properties.
    Now, let’s dig into some of the more specific and granular aspects of bitcoin (without getting into any of the technicals and programming code). It is my hope that as you read through the demonstrable properties of bitcoin that you will begin to understand why so many people are so excited for this amazing asset and what it can do for the cause of individual liberty.

    Fair Warning: This article is fairly lengthy and in-depth. The vast majority of the content is in the “End Notes, References, & Citations“. It’s not my intention to overload nor bore you. Instead, I want you to have all of the resources you need to DYOR, Do Your Own Research. Feel free to skip the End Notes if any of it becomes laborious; you can always come back to the article later on. Overall, I want you to have the confidence that you know what bitcoin actually does. It’s that knowledge and confidence that will help you Bitcoin In Peace.

    Demonstrate, Don’t Explicate

    I often encounter people who are quick to jump on bitcoin and denigrate it out-of-hand. Every single time I have asked them to describe and demonstrate the actual attributes, characteristics, properties, and qualities of bitcoin, they delay, hem and haw, obfuscate, and then finally admit that they haven’t studied bitcoin. At all.
    I kindly and gently let them know that I am always available for consultation if they ever want to get an informed view on it by joining my bitcoin MeetUp, “Bitcoin, Huntsville, Crypto, & Coffee” as well as reading my blog, BitcoinInPeace.com.
    Below, we’ll go through the demonstrable properties of bitcoin. So, if you encounter anyone who disputes this list then ask them to demonstrate their claims to you (i.e. “Bitcoin can be shutdown by the government.“). As the old saying goes, “Demonstrate, don’t explicate.” Don’t argue with them; simply ask them to show you what they are claiming. If they can’t… move on; you have more valuable things to do (like reading BitcoinInPeace.com) Of course, don’t leave without first letting them know about this great blog you found, BitcoinInPeace.com where they can get their bitcoin questions answered.
    I have made my personal best efforts to verify the list of bitcoin properties below. I either experienced them directly, observed them firsthand, or watched others use them. So, let’s get into it.

    Technical Note: These are not all of the properties of bitcoin; there are other more technical aspects of bitcoin which are equally important. But, for the sake of this opening series, the ones below are the attributes which I felt would be most impactful and relatable.

    In short, the ten most important demonstrable attributes of bitcoin are:

    1. Verifiable Intent
    2. Auditable & Open Source Programming Code
    3. Downloadable & Transparent Transaction History
    4. Completely Decentralized
    5. 24 / 7 & Global
    6. Permissionless & Voluntary
    7. Apolitical
    8. Unconfiscatable, Uncensorable, & Irreversible
    9. Extremely Secure Bitcoin “Bank Accounts”
    10. Programmatic Inflation Rate & Ultimate Supply Cap

    Let’s get into the details of this list.

    Author’s Note: While I consider #1 and #2 to be the most important bitcoin attributes, the rest are presented in no particular order of importance.

    1. Verifiable Intent

    Let’s start with the first and most important aspect of bitcoin – the “Bitcoin Whitepaper“. [1]
    This is where the creator of bitcoin, the pseudonymous “Satoshi Nakamoto“, [2] [3] stated what “he” intended with bitcoin and some of the basic architecture to make it work so effectively. In the whitepaper, he shows how he solved several challenges with traditional hard money, modern currency, and recent attempts at creating electronic cash. [4] It is considered a revolutionary invention which was built upon previously known methods and techniques from computer science, mathematics, and cryptography (hence the term “crypto“) to create the first true form of money.
    Anyone (including you) can download this bitcoin whitepaper, here, and verify what Satoshi was intending to accomplish with this new form of money. And, I recommend that all of you do just that!

    2. Auditable & Open Source Programming Code

    The second most important part of bitcoin is the bitcoin code, the software that all bitcoin users use to receive, send, and hold bitcoin. The bitcoin code is entirely “open source“. We covered the topic of open source software in the previous article, which you can read here and here, under the section “Trust… But Verify“. In short, “open source” (or “open source software“, “OSS“) means that all of the underlying code which comprises bitcoin is entirely available for anyone to download and audit on their own (and not some proprietary or secret software code like most modern software).
    Right now, you can go to GitHub.com and download the bitcoin code, check it, compile it, then run it entirely on your own without having to trust anyone else. Granted, not everyone is a programmer, but nothing prevents us from doing our personal best to see it for ourselves. We cover this concept of auditing the code in the previous article, here, under the section “Trust… But Verify“.
    To take this a step further, there are “guided tours” of the bitcoin code that anyone can watch and learn. We cover the topic of bitcoin guided tours in the previous article, here and here, under the section “Going On Tour“. You can see the bitcoin code file-by-file, section-by-section, line-by-line, character-by-character. These guided tours of the bitcoin code are actually fascinating, even for those of us who are not programmers, developers, or software engineers. I encourage everyone to try it!

    Most importantly, with bitcoin’s open source code:

    Nothing is hidden. All is transparent.

    3. Downloadable, Immutable, & Transparent Transaction History

    Bitcoin’s entire financial transactions history is completely open and transparent (on the bitcoin “blockchain[5]). When you hear “blockchain“, think an “extremely secure accounting ledger“. For free, anyone can automatically download, verify, and maintain a full record of the global “accounting ledger” (the bitcoin blockchain) onto their own private hardware. At all times, there are literally millions of virtual eyes around the world which monitor the bitcoin blockchain.
    The bitcoin blockchain is constantly updated (on average) every ten minutes. Globally. 24/7. Without fail. Without errors. Without doubt. Going further, 100% of the blockchain transactions are valid. 0% are in error or fraudulent. There is no organization which can make that claim. [6] We will cover how this happens in future blog posts.
    Let’s compare and contrast that with our central bank, The U.S. Federal Reserve. Or, we could invoke the U.S. Treasury Department, instead. [7]

    We have not had a full audit of either
    of those organizations for decades.

    If any of us were to transact on the bitcoin network we could see our transactions on the blockchain (within seconds to minutes) to prove that we sent the payment and that the amount had been deducted from our bitcoin wallet automatically. [8] To enhance this public transparency and availability, there are free websites dedicated just for the purpose of confirming these transactions which provide complete transparency of the of all transactions. [9] Now, let’s compare that to our so-called modern banks which can take days (or even weeks) to move our currency, verify the move, and finalize the transaction.
    It used to be said that something was “written in stone” as something eternal and immutable; in the not-too-distant future, the expression will instead be “written on the blockchain. Credit to Andreas Antonopoulos for the “written in the blockchain” theme. [10]

    4. Completely Decentralized

    Do you remember Napster?  [11] This peer-to-peer (“P2P“) [12] software had a meteoric rise after its start in June of 1999 and, three years later, an equally dramatic crash by June of 2002.
    What made Napster so revolutionary was the ability to share things of great value which were in digital format (almost any sort of file, usually songs) without any sort of centralized control or coordination.  Ordinary, regular people using their computers (the “peers”) were able to create temporary connections with each other over the internet, locate songs that they wanted on each other’s computers, and copy those songs across the internet without restriction.
    True P2P was born!  Independent of the legalities (and ethics), this was a revolution in the ability to transfer value over vast distances immediately and without any sort of intermediating party to control the process
    Luckily for us, bitcoin is a P2P network which does not suffer from the same issue of copyright infringement that Napster had. [13] Instead, all of the information which is shared across its network is already the (intellectual) property of the two parties who are exchanging that information, a sender and a receiver.
    Don’t worry – we will go into more detail about what this means and how it works in future articles!  Suffice it to say that bitcoin perfectly enables the direct exchange of economic value over the internet between two parties via P2P.  No middle man, or intermediary, is needed.  In the bitcoin realm, we call this “disintermediation” – removing intermediating (and usually unnecessary) parties from any process.

    So, what does this mean??” you might ask.  Great question!

    It means that bitcoin is orthogonal to,
    completely independent of, government. [14]

    Bitcoin is completely independent of governmental power, laws, regulations, ordinances, codes, controls, rules, influence, coercion, propaganda, politics, and force. [15]

    In other words, trying to regulate bitcoin
    is like trying to regulate the sun.

    As with all P2P networks, no one participant has more power than any other participant.  Any government or agency would have equal standing with any other government, company, or person. [16] Thus, we can ask this fundamental (and slightly rhetorical) question:

    What if all governments had to compete for resources the same as all of us instead of using its position of privilege and power to confiscate wealth and corrupt our values?

    What a novel concept!

    5. 24 / 7 & Global

    Since bitcoin is completely decentralized (peer-to-peer or “P2P”) and operates over the internet, bitcoin is a global asset which can be sent and received at anytime and anywhere, 24/7, 365. Since bitcoin is native to the internet, we can transact at any time with it via smart phone, computer, laptop, tablet, USB stick, etc.  Try asking your government to do that.
    Bitcoin has… no weekends, no holidays, no banker’s hours, no sick days, no leave, no vacations, no capital controls, no labor strikes, no shutdowns, no time zones, no boundaries, and no borders.
    Compare this to our current banking and governmental systems:

    • Usually not open on the weekends
    • Can’t operate on holidays
    • Not open outside of normal business hours
    • Only open 40 out of 168 hours per week (~25% of the time)
    • Can be shut down for a lack of gov’t budget (“sequestration”), investigation, or in-fighting
    • Can go on strike at any time
    • Frequently make mistakes (which we, not they, have to pay for)
    • Have ZERO performance standards and incentives

    6. Permissionless & Voluntary

    Let’s take a look at the voluntary nature of bitcoin:

    • If you want to participate in the bitcoin network, you can.
      • No one can stop you.
    • If you don’t want to participate, you don’t have to.
      • No one can coerce you.
    • You don’t have to setup a bitcoin “account”.
      • There is no “IT Helpdesk” to contend with.
    • There is no government which can order your funds to be frozen.
    • There is no bank which can deny you access to their website or your account.

    If you understand what a password is then you can participate. You simply setup your own bitcoin wallet [17] and start transacting with anyone else on the bitcoin network.

    As in the above section, when we compare this to governments and centralized banking, there are layers of impediments that these institutions can put in your way, intentional or unintentional, competently or incompetently.

    Bitcoin’s P2P nature allows it to be completely independent
    of authoritarian edicts and political squabbles.

    7. Apolitical

    Since Bitcoin is decentralized and outside of the control and influence of the state, it is completely politically neutral and cannot be weaponized.

    Let’s compare bitcoin’s political neutrality to three recent and significant examples:

    • The Russian Invasion Of Ukraine In 2022
    • The Canadian Truckers’ Convoy
    • India Decommissioning The 1,000 and 500 Rupee Notes

    The Russian Invasion Of Ukraine In 2022
    On 02/24/2022, Russia invaded Ukraine using a full-scale assault across multiple fronts within Ukraine. [18] Almost immediately afterwards, the U.S. lead the effort to cut Russia off from the SWIFT payment system [19] [20] after they invaded Ukraine. [21] The stated intention for the cutoff from SWIFT was that removing Russia’s ability to buy or sell goods and services on the global market would be severely hampered and, thus, incentivize Russia to cease hostilities and pull out of Ukraine. An unstated outcome of cutting Russia off from SWIFT meant that Russia could not pay its debts to other countries that used SWIFT. If you or any company that you own had any Russian debts then you could not receive your money.

    Ultimately, for good or for bad, the U.S. weaponized
    the SWIFT payment system, against Russia.

    The irony of the West’s financial sanctions on Russia (via SWIFT) is that the sanctions actually caused Russia to use bitcoin as a form of money for international exchange. [22] A major consequence of Russia’s use of bitcoin is that it has begun the process of integrating bitcoin (and other crypto-assets) into its country’s financial and economic systems. Additionally, Russia’s major trading partners, China and India, have increased their exposure to bitcoin for economic and financial purposes. It’s almost as if the U.S. tightening its grip causes it to lose more control… [23]
    On the other hand, bitcoin is accessible by all countries and people alike. Bitcoin is completely apolitical and neutral. It is the ideal mode of exchanging value.

    8. Unconfiscatable, Uncensorable, & Irreversible

    The Canadian Truckers’ Convoy
    Now, let’s focus on our second major historical example, the “Canadian Truckers’ Convoy” (“CTC”), which was forged to protest against the Canadian government (in 03/2022) for a variety of reasons. [24]
    As a crucial part of the Convoy, these truckers needed basic supplies and equipment (i.e. diesel fuel, propane, food, blankets, sanitary items, etc.) just to subsist and maintain their protest. They asked the world to donate to their non-violent protest. And, the world responded generously.
    To facilitate donations, the CTC opened a GoFundMe page to request donations. But, due to political authoritarian pressure that the Canadian government and Prime Minister Trudeau placed on that website, GoFundMe actually shutdown the CTC’s donation page and refused to allow the Canadian Trucker’s Convoy to withdraw their funds. [25] [26]
    The CTC pivoted quickly by asking people to donate directly to their bitcoin exchange account (which is similar to a stock brokerage and exchange account such as the NASDAQ or NYSE). Again, the Canadian government and PM Trudeau interfered and disallowed the CTC to withdraw donated funds. [27]
    Finally, the Canadian Truckers Convoy gave the Canadian government the “flying finger of friendship” and decided to cut all ties with any centralized organization for the purpose of receiving funding. The CTC asked donors to provide bitcoin directly. [28] And, the funds started flowing because bitcoin is completely independently of any government. There are even videos of individual truckers receiving bitcoin and using it to pay for critical items. [29] CTC protestors were able to do this because:

    Bitcoin is unconfiscatable, uncensorable, and irreversible.

    Ultimately, the state, a centralized institution, used its power to influence other centralized institutions (which used a centralized fiat currency) to prevent legitimate donors from supporting a worthy civic cause. The Canadian government imposed draconian capital controls upon the people of the world to prevent them from sending their own fiat currencies to whomever they wanted. Those around the world who wished to support the CTC had their will subverted by the Canadian government.

    Bitcoin transcends this.

    The Canadian government could not prevent bitcoin donations, stop the receipt of those bitcoin, nor take those donated bitcoin away. Bitcoin allows anyone from around the world to donate to anyone else around the world.  And, there is no middleman to take an administrative slice or to prevent the funds from flowing. [30]

    India Decommissioning The 1,000 and 500 Rupee Notes [31]
    Let us turn our attention to the third major example, India demonetizing its 1,000 and 500 Rupee notes. [32] In short, with the stroke of pen, the government evaporated the savings of tens of millions of people by decommissioning these high denomination Rupee bills.
    The unbanked had no ability to keep their savings in electronic formats. Thus, they were forced to maintain their savings in physical bills, mostly 1,000 and 500 Rupee notes.  Financial chaos amongst the poor and rich alike ensued. In a flash, tens of millions of Indian citizens had to rush to banks to exchange their 1,000 and 500 Rupee notes for smaller denomination notes.  This caused a run on the banks and many people had their savings immediately evaporated.  In addition, capital controls were put into place which limited the amount of Rupees each individual could exchange per day.  Entire black markets sprung up overnight to fill the need to move to smaller denominations.
    The Indian government claimed it was “fighting black markets” (which, by definition, are the minority of transactions) and eagerly ruined the lives of millions of its people in order to push its political agenda.
    Ultimately, with bitcoin, there is no politician who can decommission nor demonetize your bitcoin. Bitcoin is your property independent of any government.

    The State Cannot Stop Bitcoin
    Referring to a previous article in the opening series (here under the section “Are You Tired Of…?”), we asked two fundamental questions:

    • Are you tired of feeling like a criminal taking your money out of your bank account?
    • Are you tired of one set of humans (those in government) telling another set of humans (you) how they should and should not live their lives?

    In all three instances above (removing Russia from SWIFT, the Canadian Truckers’ Convoy, and India Demonetizing the Rupee), a tiny contingent of politicians and bureaucrats were able to impose their will and corrupted values upon hundreds of millions of people, both friend and foe alike, mostly with a few strokes of the pen. They were able to do this because of control over their fiat currency systems.
    The government can compel you, your bank, or any other financial institution to reverse any financial transaction that it wants to, without your explicit permission.  While there may be legal challenges to this, the fact would still remain that you would have to prove your own innocence.  Eventually, “the process is the punishment“.
    Many might argue that this could be an innocent mistake but does that matter to you?   What if you have an immediate need such as buying a new house, a medical emergency, or an unexpected large expense?  These institutions and governments do not care about your well-being; they care about their “processes”.

    Bitcoin is fixes this.

    Let’s compare the above indictment of government to bitcoin. Bitcoin is just software code, thus, it is free speech. [33] There are no gold bars to steal, no bank transactions to meddle with, no payment apps to threaten, no central banks to change policy.
    Without going into detail, every ten minutes after a bitcoin transaction is posted to the bitcoin blockchain, the ability to reverse that transaction becomes exponentially more difficult. A general rule of thumb in the bitcoin world is that a transaction that has settled on the bitcoin blockchain for at least an hour on the blockchain is impossible to reverse. Thus, no government in the world has the ability to confiscate that bitcoin by reversing the transaction.

    9. Extremely Secure Bitcoin “Bank Accounts

    Bitcoin “wallets” are where we “store” our bitcoin, like a safe or bank account. This is a slight over-simplification but good enough for now.
    Bitcoin wallets are VERY secure and can be made EXTREMELY MORE secure with layers of security which are relatively easy and straightforward to implement. [34]
    When compared to our modern banking system, bitcoin is literally many, many orders of magnitude more secure and safer than any bank or government in existence. We have countless examples of banks and governments having their funds stolen, their websites corrupted or even outright shutdown.
    In comparison, since its inception, bitcoin has had a 100% up-time record with 0% errant or fraudulent transactions. I defy anyone to show me a bank or government agency with the same level of performance with zero cost to the public.

    Ultimately, if you can send and receive email
    then you can use bitcoin safely and securely.

    10. Ultimate Supply Cap & Programmatic Inflation

    In order to dive into these two topics of ultimate supply cap and programmatic inflation, we need to present a graph that is a good representation of the two concepts.

    Nerd Note: Sometimes the ultimate supply cap is called the “hard supply cap” or just “supply cap”.

    To understand the layout of this graph, click on the end note at the end of this sentence to understand it. [35] Once you feel comfortable with the layout, then come back here so we can look at the blue and orange lines. Of course, you’re free to skip it if that’s most comfortable for you.

    Now that we’ve defined the framework for our graph, we can begin to look at the underlying concepts.

    The Ultimate Supply Cap (Blue Line)
    Bitcoin has a hard limit of 21,000,000 bitcoin “tokens” which will be produced (“mined”). When that limit is reached (circa 2140), no more bitcoin will be created. [37]

    That means that there is an ultimate cap of 21M bitcoin.

    For the first time in human history, we have synthetic scarcity.

    In this context, “synthetic scarcity” mean a digital asset which cannot simply be replicated ad infinitum (like a digital photograph or song), but instead is solidly limited in quantity.
    While we won’t go into how this works now (but we will cover this in later articles), suffice it to say that all of us can audit the bitcoin code to see for ourselves that this hard limit is an absolute demonstrable fact. [37]

    No one can change it.
    No one can cheat the system.
    No one can edge out the public.

    This idea of an ultimate supply cap via synthetic scarcity is brand new. It is changing our understanding of economics and markets permanently.

    The Programmatic Inflation Rate (The Orange Line)
    Bitcoin’s programmatic inflation rate has precisely defined how new bitcoin tokens are introduced into the economy for ~140 years. Just like the ultimate supply cap, this is a completely new and innovative approach to monetary policy; removing the state from the creation and issuance of money.

    Economics Note: In this context, “inflation” refers to changes in the money supply, not necessarily changes in the prices of goods and services. [38]

    This is why programmatic inflation is so important and impactful:

    • In 20, 50, and 100 years from now, all of us will know exactly how much bitcoin will have been created (mined) and what the inflation rate will be then.
    • Anyone can participate in the creation (mining) of bitcoin.
    • No matter how many people or companies start mining for bitcoin, the programmatic inflation rate continues exactly as planned.
    • Technological improvements to bitcoin mining make no difference to the inflation rate.
    • No one company can have a monopoly on bitcoin mining (creation).
    • Independent of the price of bitcoin, high or low, the new supply issuance (the bitcoin inflation rate) doesn’t change.
    • Changes in the demand for bitcoin have no impact on the inflation rate.
    • No amount of government interference can change the inflation rate.
    • Central banks cannot engage in “quantitative easing“, “QE infinity”, nor “liquidity injection“.

    All of the above impacts lead to one very important aspect of economics – elasticity. [39] In the case of bitcoin, its supply is considered to be “perfectly inelastic“. [40]

    Nerd Note: If you have concerns about there being “enough” bitcoin for everyone, please read this note [41]

    The One-Two Punch
    These two concepts, ultimate supply cap and programmatic inflation, are revolutionary and unprecedented because they completely take the money printers out of the hands of the state.  This is one of the most important steps to separating state from money.  The concepts of “quantitative easing” or “injecting liquidity” or “bank bailouts[42] are not possible with a capped supply and programmatic inflation rates because the state is not able to print currency on a whim, ad hoc, ad infinitum, ad nauseam.

    Thus, governments cannot evaporate the value of
    your savings by blowing up the currency supply
    in order to fund their favorite pet projects

    Instead, the politicians must appeal to each of us for funding by way of open and obvious taxation. [43] And, while taxation is never desirable, it is far preferable to the “sly or roundabout way” of covert taxation by monetary inflation due to the fact that taxation is obvious and visible. [44]

    Conclusion: Bitcoin Is Money The Superior Form Of Money

    People often ask me if bitcoin is money.  Without trying to be snarky, I always answer their question with another question, “What is money?” [45]
    I usually get one of two responses: 1) a list of currencies or 2) some definition akin to “Something which allows you to trade.”  In an attempt to build good faith with the person, I will ask a series of clarifying questions in conversation which probes about other properties of money, such as scarcity and durability (much as we covered in a previous article, here.
    It is reasonable that people might become frustrated with me for asking them these questions and not simply giving them a straightforward answer (“Why can’t you just tell me if bitcoin is money??“).  The point is that commencing with a bad starting point (a poor definition of money) allows us to arrive at pretty much any conclusion we want, including contradictory ones.
    While being methodical can be a bit laborious, I can’t help but think that when it comes to something as fundamental as money and the tens of thousands of hours of our lives that we exchange for money, that we ought to invest a little bit of earnest time and effort to understand it and come to reasonable definitions and conclusions about this fundamental pillar of civil society.

    Cultural Note:  As you have probably picked up by now, I have real disdain for people who are anti-bitcoin AND have not studied it AND denigrate bitcoin publicly.  All of them ought to be ashamed of themselves for talking about a subject about which they have deliberately stayed ignorant.  I have compiled a short list of ardent and ignorant “anti-bitcoiners” below. [46] This is also why I politely push back against people’s assertions that “bitcoin isn’t money” by asking them to define money first.  100% of the time I have challenged people on their anti-bitcoin notion they have admitted that they don’t actually have a good working definition of money.  That’s when the healing begins.

    What This Means For You

    As we covered in a previous article, here, we have seen multiple instances throughout history where a hard money standard always:

    • Naturally and passively restrained the state
    • Encouraged individual liberty
    • Fostered innovation
    • Greatly improved the living conditions of entire populations

    Time and time again, the use of dependable money showed us that economic prosperity and political freedom are not coincidental; instead, they are intertwined and inherent with one another. [47]
    This extended article is meant to be a primer on the demonstrable properties and qualities of bitcoin that would have the greatest impact to most people. By understanding what bitcoin actually does, you can tell others what it means to you and all freedom loving people:

    It means… bitcoin is hard money.
    It means… bitcoin is dependable money.

    It means… you have an escape hatch
    from the authoritarian and oppressive state.

    I hope that BitcoinInPeace.com provides a real glimmer of hope, a reason to be optimistic about your future and the future of those around you.

    Next Steps

    In this post, we talked about some of the high-level properties of bitcoin which are impactful and demonstrable as well as illustrated how those properties mirror those of hard money. This brings Part 3 of the opening series, “Bitcoin: The Ultimate Freedom Accelerator“, to a close.
    Next up, we’ll begin Part 4 of the opening series by discussing the impact that a hard money standard has on the world and how bitcoin will fulfill that role.

    The Learning Never Stops!

    If you want to continue your journey of learning about all things bitcoin with knowledgeable people who love to be helpful, I highly recommend my bitcoin MeetUp, “Bitcoin, Huntsville, Crypto, & Coffee” which you can find here .  We meet two times every month online to discuss bitcoin and its impact on the world. You’ll be able to talk directly with others who are also on their personal bitcoin journey and ask them engaging questions.  We’re not selling anything. The only thing that we ask of you is to come to the table in good faith and be willing to DYOR – Do Your Own Research. We love newbies and the energy they bring!

    Donations

    If you found value in this article please feel free to donate via the following payment methods:

    CashApp:
    $JohnYoung357

    Venmo:
    @John-Young-359

    Bitcoin:
    Bc1qay7mwv6zfepgx8jarw9jhmera660g4f0k4ukv7

    End Notes, References, & Citations

    [1] The Bitcoin Whitepaper

    You can download the bitcoin whitepaper here

    Brave search engine summary: “What is the bitcoin whitepaper
    Bitcoin Whitepaper Explained
    The Bitcoin white paper, titled ‘Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System‘, is a foundational document written by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto. It was published on October 31, 2008, and introduced the concept of Bitcoin, a decentralized digital currency system that operates without a central authority.
    The white paper explains how Bitcoin functions as a peer-to-peer network, where transactions are verified and recorded through a public ledger known as the blockchain.
    It outlines the proof-of-work mechanism, which ensures the security and integrity of the transactions by making it computationally difficult to alter the blockchain.
    Bitcoin’s white paper also addresses the double-spend problem, a critical issue in digital currencies where a user might attempt to spend the same funds twice. Nakamoto’s solution involves a distributed timestamp server that records a series of cryptographically signed transactions, ensuring that each transaction is unique and secure.
    The document emphasizes the importance of decentralization, ensuring that the network’s security, resilience, and trustworthiness are distributed among its participants.
    It also discusses the concept of mining, which is how the Bitcoin network programmatically issues new Bitcoin and enforces scarcity, ensuring that only 21 million Bitcoin will ever exist.
    Overall, the Bitcoin white paper is a concise yet foundational document that has significantly influenced the development of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology.

    [2] Satoshi Nakamoto

    Brave search engine summary: “Who is Satoshi Nakamoto
    Who is Satoshi Nakamoto
    Satoshi Nakamoto is the pseudonym of the individual or group who created Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization.
    Nakamoto introduced Bitcoin to the world in 2008 with a whitepaper titled ‘Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System‘. The true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto remains unknown, despite numerous theories and investigations.
    Nakamoto used the British spelling of certain words, such a ‘favour‘, suggesting a connection to the United Kingdom or someone educated there.
    The pseudonym’s identity has been linked to various individuals, including Dorian Nakamoto, Hal Finney, Nick Szabo, and Peter Todd, but none of these claims have been definitively proven.
    In a notable development, a 2024 HBO documentary titled ‘Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery‘ directed by Cullen Hoback, suggested that Peter Todd might be the original creator of Bitcoin. Todd, however, denied being Nakamoto.
    The mystery surrounding Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity continues to intrigue the cryptocurrency community, with some believing that revealing the true identity could have significant consequences for Bitcoin’s decentralized nature.

    Satoshi Nakamoto
    Satoshi Nakamoto is the name used by the presumed pseudonymous person or persons who developed bitcoin, authored the bitcoin white paper, and created and deployed bitcoin’s original reference implementation. As part of the implementation, Nakamoto also devised the first blockchain database. Nakamoto was active in the development of bitcoin until December 2010.
    There has been widespread speculation about Nakamoto’s true identity, with various people posited as the person or persons behind the name. Though Nakamoto’s name is Japanese, and inscribed as a man living in Japan, most of the speculation has involved software and cryptography experts in the United States or Europe.

    [3] Satoshi Nakamoto’s anonymous status
    The person or persons using the pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto” is not publicly known.  We do not know if this was a single person or a group of individuals.  There has been a considerable amount of speculation to determine who Nakamoto is. It is a fascinating topic on which the stuff of legends is built.  For convenience, when referring to Satoshi, I will simply say “he“, “him“, “Satoshi“, “Nakamoto“, or “Mr. Nakamoto” and acknowledge our collective ignorance (yet eternal gratitude).

    [4] “Ecash” and “Hashcash

    Ecash
    Ecash was conceived by David Chaum as an anonymous cryptographic electronic money or electronic cash system in 1982. It was realized through his corporation Digicash and used as micropayment system at one US bank from 1995 to 1998.

    Author’s Note: The “Ecash” of the early 1990’s is completely different from the “eCash” (symbol: XEC) crypto-asset that was created in the 2020’s.

    Hashcash
    Hashcash is a proof-of-work algorithm, which has been used as a denial-of-service counter measure technique in a number of systems.
    A hashcash stamp constitutes a proof-of-work which takes a parameterizable amount of work to compute for the sender. The recipient (and indeed anyone as it is publicly auditable) can verify received hashcash stamps efficiently. Hashcash was invented by Adam Back in 1997

    Hashcash
    Hashcash is a proof-of-work system used to limit email spam and denial-of-service attacks. Hashcash was proposed in 1997 by Adam Back and described more formally in Back’s 2002 paper ‘Hashcash – A Denial of Service Counter-Measure’. In Hashcash the client has to concatenate a random number with a string several times and hash this new string. It then has to do so over and over until a hash beginning with a certain number of zeros is found.”

    [5] The bitcoin blockchain

    Brave search engine summary “bitcoin blockchain summary
    Bitcoin Blockchain Summary
    A blockchain, particularly the Bitcoin blockchain, is a decentralized, digital ledger that records transactions in a secure and transparent manner. Each block in the chain contains transaction data, a timestamp, and a cryptographic hash of the previous block, creating an immutable record.
    The Bitcoin blockchain is distributed across a network of computers called nodes, each maintaining a copy of the entire blockchain. When a new transaction occurs, it is verified by the network and added to a block. Once a block is filled with transactions, it is added to the blockchain.
    Transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain are verified through a process called mining, where miners compete to solve complex mathematical puzzles. The first miner to solve the puzzle gets the right to add the block to the blockchain and is rewarded with newly minted bitcoins.
    This process ensures the integrity and security of the blockchain, as altering any data in a block would require changing all subsequent blocks and obtaining consensus from the network, which is computationally infeasible.
    The Bitcoin blockchain is transparent in that all transactions can be traced and viewed by anyone, but it also allows users to remain pseudonymous by not directly linking transactions to real-life identities.
    In summary, the Bitcoin blockchain is a secure, decentralized ledger that records transactions through a network of nodes and mining processes, ensuring the integrity and transparency of the Bitcoin network.

    What Is a Blockchain?
    A blockchain is a distributed database or ledger shared across a computer network’s nodes. They are best known for their crucial role in cryptocurrency systems, maintaining a secure and decentralized record of transactions, but they are not limited to cryptocurrency uses. Blockchains can be used to make data in any industry immutable—meaning it cannot be altered.
    Since a block can’t be changed, the only trust needed is at the point where a user or program enters data. This reduces the need for trusted third parties, such as auditors or other humans, who add costs and can make mistakes.

    Balances – Block Chain
    The block chain is a shared public ledger on which the entire Bitcoin network relies. All confirmed transactions are included in the block chain. It allows Bitcoin wallets to calculate their spendable balance so that new transactions can be verified thereby ensuring they’re actually owned by the spender. The integrity and the chronological order of the block chain are enforced with cryptography.

    [6] Bitcoin use on dark web sites for illicit activities

    Due to the fact that the bitcoin blockchain is completely auditable, the top dark web sites have started to shy away from bitcoin as payment for illicit substances and services. This is entirely in contrast to the highly fraudulent and bad faith claims of politicians and other public figures who vehemently assert that bitcoin is solely (mostly) used for criminal purposes. [65] Let’s compare that to fiat currency which is THE primary payment method for crime around the planet.  In fact, current estimates on the use of fiat currency for crime are orders of magnitude greater than those use by bitcoin. [66] [67]

    Brave search engine summary: “Do the top dark web sites allow bitcoin
    Dark Web Bitcoin Access
    Yes, the top dark web sites do allow Bitcoin, but they increasingly support other cryptocurrencies as well. Bitcoin has been the de facto currency for dark web marketplaces since the emergence of Silk Road in 2011.
    However, due to concerns over Bitcoin’s traceability, many modern markets now offer alternative privacy-focused cryptocurrencies like Monero (XMR) and USDT (TRC20) alongside Bitcoin. For example, Vortex, a prominent darknet marketplace, supports Bitcoin, Monero, and USDT. Similarly, Abacus supports both Bitcoin and Monero, emphasizing security and user experience. While Bitcoin remains widely accepted, the trend shows a shift towards cryptocurrencies with stronger privacy features to enhance user anonymity.
    ” [emphasis added by J. Young]

    [7] The Federal Reserve and the Treasury Dept.

    Let’s compare and contrast that with our central bank, The U.S. Federal Reserve. Or, we can invoke the U.S. Treasury Department. Neither of those are transparent nor are they accountable in any way to the citizenry of the U.S. We can extend this to all of the world’s central banks. None of them provide any semblance of openness. In fact, many of the Fed’s documents are actually classified. Why? What does the manager of our money supply need to classify? What about the large commercial banks (i.e. JP Morgan Chase Bank, Wells Fargo, Bank Of America, Citibank, which are extensions of the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department)? They can create currency (credit) out of thin air without any accountability to the people. The communications between their executives and boards of directors can be kept secret without a stitch of transparency even though a few dozen people have carte blanch to control the creation and flow of one of the most fundamental aspects of a modern civilization. When was the last time you were able to audit the nation’s gold supply in Fort Knox? How about being able to crosscheck payments made by the Treasury Dept.?

    Author’s Note: I want to give proper recognition to the Department Of Government Efficiency (“DOGE“) for its work in uncovering fraud, waste, and general maleficence at the federal level. That was definitely overdue. But, we are entirely dependent upon some people acting altruistically and nobly (to “appeal to our better angels[64]). The moment we switch administrations is the moment we go right back to the old way of doing things. As of the writing of this article, there is a distinct possibility that DOGE will actually audit The Fed as well as the supposed gold stores in Fort Knox.

    [8] The speed of the Lightning Network

    In an attempt to improve the transaction times for bitcoin transactions and to enable relatively small transactions to take place using bitcoin (i.e. a cup of coffee), the Lightning Network (“LN”) was created. The LN allowed bitcoin transactions to clear with 1 – 10 seconds, a vast improvement over bitcoin’s capabilities. In addition, the cost of the vast majority of LN transaction are a fraction of a penny. There are some legitimate hurdles that the LN must overcome but I have trust in human ingenuity that these hurdles will be solved and bitcoin will become the primary means by which people transact.

    [9] Bitcoin blockchain explorers

    Any person can check the blockchain manually by using these user-friendly websites:

    [10] “written in the the blockchain

    Credit to Andreas Antonopoulos for the “written in the blockchain” theme. I saw a YouTube video where he coined the term but I have not been able to relocate the video.

    [11] Napster

    Napster’s can be found website here

    Napster
    Napster was an American peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing application primarily associated with digital audio file distribution. Founded by Shawn Fanning and Sean Parker, the platform originally launched on June 1, 1999. Audio shared on the service was typically encoded in the MP3 format. As the software became popular, the company encountered legal difficulties over copyright infringement. Napster ceased operations in 2001 after losing multiple lawsuits and filed for bankruptcy in June 2002.
    The P2P model employed by Napster involved a centralized database that indexed a complete list of all songs being shared from connected clients. While effective, the service could not function without the central database, which was hosted by Napster and eventually forced to shut down. Following Napster’s demise, alternative decentralized methods of P2P file-sharing emerged, including LimeWire, Gnutella, Freenet, FastTrack, and BitTorrent.

    [12] Peer-to-Peer (“P2P”)

    Peer-To-Peer
    Peer-to-peer (P2P) computing or networking is a distributed application architecture that partitions tasks or workloads between peers. Peers are equally privileged, equipotent participants in the network, forming a peer-to-peer network of nodes. In addition, a personal area network (PAN) is also in nature a type of decentralized peer-to-peer network typically between two devices.
    The opposite of a peer-to-peer network: based on the client–server model, where individual clients request services and resources from centralized servers.
    Peers make a portion of their resources, such as processing power, disk storage, or network bandwidth, directly available to other network participants, without the need for central coordination by servers or stable hosts. Peers are both suppliers and consumers of resources, in contrast to the traditional client–server model in which the consumption and supply of resources are divided.”

    What Is Peer-To-Peer (P2P)?

    What is P2P ? – Peer to Peer explained

    [13] Napster’s doomed history

    Of course, many of us know that Napster was doomed to failure almost immediately due to the fact that Napster was facilitating the unauthorized copying and mass-distribution of copyrighted material, a violation of the rights of the owners of the original content (enter Lars Ulrich of Metallica [61])

    [14] Orthogonal

    Orthogonal is a geometry term. It means “at right angles”. So, the walls of your house are orthogonal. The intersection of two roads can be orthogonal. A synonym would be ‘perpendicular‘. In statistics, it means that two things are statistically independent. Building on that second definition, it is often used metaphorically to describe two things that are not aligned, unrelated, negatively related, or complete opposites. For example, you might say that in casino gambling, skill and success are orthogonal. One is not related to the other.

    What does orthogonal really mean?

    Orthogonality
    In mathematics, orthogonality is the generalization of the geometric notion of perpendicularity. Whereas perpendicular is typically followed by to when relating two lines to one another (e.g., ‘line A is perpendicular to line B‘), orthogonal is commonly used without to (e.g., ‘orthogonal lines A and B‘).
    Orthogonality is also used with various meanings that are often weakly related or not related at all with the mathematical meanings.

    [15] Shutting down the internet

    For those who claim that governments “merely” have to shut down the internet in order to stop bitcoin, I would challenge them by asking them, “When has deliberately shutting down the internet ever worked?
    Iran tried that several years ago and it backfired spectacularly with costs valued in the hundreds of millions of U.S. dollars. [62] But, let’s say that all governments shut down the internet in their respective countries in order to stop bitcoin.  That means the entirety of global finance, supply chains, power plants, electricity, heating, air conditioning, medical facilities, telecom, manufacturing, militaries, governments, in fact, all of the technologies of modern society would crash.  Instantly.  And, those who own bitcoin would still own their bitcoin.  It would be like shooting oneself in the foot to swat a fly which had landed there.
    An additional perspective to consider: if the government is trying to shut it down or ban you from owning and using it then it’s probably something which you ought to consider taking a deeper look at.
    Finally, if our governments are shutting down the internet then they are shutting down all militaries, law enforcement, banking, finance, supply chains, electric grids, air conditioning, modern medicine, and manufacturing. And, we still own our bitcoin.

    [16] Schelling Point

    Brave search engine summary: “Schelling point
    Schelling Point
    A Schelling Point, also known as a focal point, is a solution that people tend to choose by default in the absence of communication, because it seems natural, special, or relevant to them. The concept was introduced by economist Thomas Schelling in his 1960 book The Strategy of Conflict, where he demonstrated it through thought experiments, such as determining where to meet a stranger in New York City without prior communication. The most common answer to this scenario was “noon at Grand Central Terminal,” a location that stands out due to its prominence and tradition as a meeting place, even though no objective advantage exists. Schelling points arise from shared knowledge, cultural context, or salience, allowing individuals to coordinate successfully in cooperative games without direct communication. This principle extends to various domains, including economics, social norms, international relations, and even the value of money, which functions as a Schelling point because people expect it to be universally accepted.

    [17] Setting up your own bitcoin wallet

    Setting up a bitcoin wallet is not a difficult task. For the most part, it merely requires that you be open-minded. There are many different types of wallets which can you can use depending on your personal needs. In addition, there are literally dozens of very helpful videos and website which can show you exactly what you need to do to setup your own bitcoin wallet. While setting up a bitcoin wallet is slightly technical, the free market has done a great job of providing solutions which are straightforward and dependable. Many solution providers even have customer support to walk you through the process. Millions of people around the world have created their own wallets without any technical knowledge. Overall, there is no reason to be intimidated by choosing and setting up your own personal bitcoin wallet.

    [18] Russia invading Ukraine in 2022

    Brave search engine summary: “When did Russia invade Ukraine
    Russia Invades Ukraine
    Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022, beginning with missile strikes across the country before dawn and a multi-front ground assault.
    This marked a major escalation of the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War, which had started in 2014 with Russia’s annexation of Crimea and support for separatist movements in the Donbas region. The 2022 invasion is the largest conflict in Europe since World War II.

    Russian invasion of Ukraine
    On 24 February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine, starting the largest and deadliest war in Europe since World War II, in a major escalation of the conflict between the two countries which began in 2014. The fighting has caused hundreds of thousands of military casualties and tens of thousands of Ukrainian civilian casualties. As of 2025, Russian troops occupy about 20% of Ukraine. From a population of 41 million, about 8 million Ukrainians had been internally displaced and more than 8.2 million had fled the country by April 2023, creating Europe’s largest refugee crisis since World War II.

    [19] The SWIFT payment system

    You can visit the SWIFT homepage here

    Brave search engine summary: “SWIFT payment system
    SWIFT Payment System
    The SWIFT payment system, short for the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, is a secure global messaging network used by financial institutions to exchange standardized financial messages, primarily instructions for international money transfers. It does not move funds directly, nor does it hold accounts or perform clearing and settlement functions; instead, it acts as a carrier of messages containing payment instructions between banks. The network facilitates transactions by routing these messages through unique identifiers, known as SWIFT codes (or BICs, Business Identifier Codes), which are 8 or 11-character strings identifying the financial institution, country, city, and branch.
    SWIFT connects over 11,000 financial institutions across more than 200 countries, enabling secure, reliable, and standardized communication for international payments, securities trades, treasury operations, and other financial services.
    The network processes an average of over 44 million messages daily, with traffic continuing to grow. While SWIFT is the dominant global financial messaging system, alternative networks exist, such as Ripple, CIPS, and the Russian SPF, though access can be restricted by national regulations.
    The system operates by converting a payment request into a structured message using a proprietary syntax, which is then routed via the SWIFT network to the recipient bank using the relevant SWIFT codes.
    The recipient bank processes the instruction, verifies details including beneficiary information and compliance with sanctions, and initiates the fund transfer through correspondent banking relationships or other settlement systems. The entire process is supported by services like compliance analytics, risk management tools, and integration solutions to ensure security and regulatory adherence.
    A significant development in the system is the ongoing migration from legacy MT message formats to the more advanced ISO 20022 standard, which began in March 2023.
    This transition aims to enhance transparency, increase data capacity, and improve interoperability between banks, ultimately leading to more efficient and lower-cost cross-border payments. Despite its critical role, SWIFT is not a bank or a payment system itself but a foundational infrastructure that underpins global financial transactions.

    SWIFT
    The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT), legally S.W.I.F.T. SC, is a cooperative established in 1973 in Belgium (French: Société Coopérative) and owned by the banks and other member firms that use its service. SWIFT provides the main messaging network through which international payments are initiated.[2] It also sells software and services to financial institutions, mostly for use on its proprietary ‘SWIFTNet’, and assigns ISO 9362 Business Identifier Codes (BICs), popularly known as ‘SWIFT codes’.

    [20] Russia cutoff from SWIFT payment system

    Brave search engine summary: “Russia cutoff from SWIFT”
    Russia Excluded from SWIFT
    Russia has been partially cut off from the SWIFT international financial messaging system as part of sanctions imposed by the EU, US, UK, and other allies following its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In March 2022, seven major Russian banks—including VTB Bank, Bank Otkritie, and Vnesheconombank (VEB)—were disconnected from SWIFT, effectively limiting their ability to conduct fast and secure international transactions. Although Sberbank, Russia’s largest bank, was initially spared due to concerns over energy payments, the European Commission later proposed adding it and other institutions to the ban.
    SWIFT itself does not transfer funds but enables secure communication between banks for cross-border payments, and being excluded forces affected banks to rely on slower, less reliable methods like email or telex. In response, Russia has developed its own alternative system, the System for Transfer of Financial Messages (SPFS), and is working with China’s Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) to reduce reliance on SWIFT. Despite the sanctions, some Russian banks have found workarounds; for example, VTB Bank has enabled transfers to China’s Alipay platform, suggesting ongoing access to international financial flows through alternative channels. As of 2025, further sanctions have been considered, including a proposal to disconnect up to 15 additional Russian banks from SWIFT under a new EU sanctions package, though approval requires unanimous support among EU members and remains uncertain.

    SWIFT ban against Russian banks
    The SWIFT ban against some Russian banks is one of several international sanctions against Russia imposed by the European Union and other western countries as a result of its invasion of Ukraine, aimed at weakening the country’s economy to end the invasion by hindering Russian access to the SWIFT financial transaction processing system.

    [21] My thoughts on Russia invading Ukraine

    We need to call the Russian invasion of Ukraine what it truly was – evil.  Both the Ukrainian and Russian people have paid the price for Putin’s drive for power. That said, what I don’t like is one country (the U.S.) being able to cut off another country’s (Russia’s) ability to make and receive payments on a whim. In this case, by cutting off Russia from the SWIFT payment system.
    At first blush, it seems like Russia is really being “punished” because they are seemingly prevented from being able to sell their goods on the international stage (i.e. crude oil, lumber, iron ore, etc.) because global buyers would not be able to pay them through the SWIFT system while the ban is in effect.
    But, there are huge knock-on effects of cutting one country off from a massive payment system such as SWIFT. We need to take this to its logical conclusion; if Russia cannot be paid through SWIFT then Russia cannot pay, either.  So, if Russia cannot use SWIFT then they cannot pay their debts to any other country which uses SWIFT, that includes companies and people.
    Thus, if you have a company which is doing business with Russia or a Russian company and they owe you (or your company) money, then you might have a very difficult time being paid or might not get paid at all.  The U.S. federal government has hamstrung your finances without your permission and mostly for political purposes.  Politically controlled money has enabled politically driven agendas and caused real and practical damage.
    Ultimately, we must ask ourselves this question: “If the U.S. can cut off another country from the international financial system ad hoc, what’s to prevent them from doing so for even minor reasons?
    By the way, in keeping with our theme of fighting against fiat currencies, Russia was only able to invade Ukraine because it had its virtual money printers which allowed it to fund the war.  Otherwise, it would have had to appeal directly to the Russian people for funding via taxation.  And, I think we’re seeing that large swaths of the Russian population do not condone what Putin has done.  I think we know how they would have voted with their wallets.

    [22] Russia using bitcoin

    Brave search engine summary: “Russia used bitcoin
    Russia Uses Bitcoin
    Russia has increasingly utilized Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies to facilitate international trade, particularly with China and India, as a means to circumvent Western sanctions.
    This shift is part of a broader strategy to reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar and traditional financial systems like SWIFT, which were restricted following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The Russian government has formally endorsed this practice through legislative changes that allow the use of cryptocurrencies in foreign trade and have legalized crypto mining within the country. Russian oil companies have been using Bitcoin and stablecoins like Tether (USDT) to conduct international transactions, reportedly involving tens of millions of dollars monthly.
    Finance Minister Anton Siluanov confirmed in December 2024 that domestically mined Bitcoin is being used in foreign trade under an experimental framework, stating such transactions are already occurring and should be expanded.
    The Bank of Russia has opened up bitcoin and crypto buying to a ‘
    limited circle of Russian investors,‘ defined as those with significant wealth or income, signaling a significant policy shift from previous opposition to cryptocurrencies.
    This development follows a 2024 law that regulated crypto ownership and mining while maintaining a ban on domestic use, allowing businesses to use digital assets for international payments.
    Russia’s use of Bitcoin is also linked to its energy sector, where excess power from gas and electricity is being used to fuel large-scale mining operations, particularly in its ‘
    shadow territories‘ like Transnistria and Donbas.

    Russia is using bitcoin in foreign trade, finance minister says
    MOSCOW, Dec 25 (Reuters) – Russian companies have begun using bitcoin and other digital currencies in international payments following legislative changes that allowed such use in order to counter Western sanctions, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov said on Wednesday.
    Sanctions have complicated Russia’s trade with its major partners such as China or Turkey, as local banks are extremely cautious with Russia-related transactions to avoid scrutiny from Western regulators.

    [23] Princess Leia quote

    The more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers” — Princess Leia to Grand Moff Tarkin

    [24] The Canadian Truckers’ Convoy

    Brave search engine summary: “Canadian truckers convoy
    Canadian Truckers Convoy
    The Canadian truckers’ convoy, known as the “Freedom Convoy” (French: Convoi de la liberté), was a series of protests and blockades across Canada in early 2022, initially organized to oppose COVID-19 vaccine mandates for cross-border truck drivers.
    The movement began in January 2022, with the first convoy departing Prince Rupert on January 22, and expanded to protest all pandemic-related restrictions and mandates. Hundreds of vehicles, including trucks and cars, traveled from various parts of Canada, converging in Ottawa by January 29 for a rally at Parliament Hill.
    The protests were sparked by new rules requiring Canadian truckers crossing into the United States to be fully vaccinated, effective January 15, 2022, ending previous exemptions for essential workers.
    Although an estimated 85–90% of the 120,000 Canadian truckers serving cross-border routes were already vaccinated, concerns about job losses and supply chain disruptions fueled opposition. Organizers, including groups like Canada Unity, framed the convoy as a broader stand against government overreach and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s pandemic policies.
    The convoy gained national and international attention, with demonstrations spreading to other Canadian cities, key border crossings like the Ambassador Bridge and Coutts-Sweetgrass, and solidarity protests in the U.S. and New Zealand.
    In Ottawa, the protest paralyzed the downtown core for weeks, with thousands of vehicles blocking streets around Parliament Hill. The situation prompted Ottawa’s mayor to declare a state of emergency on February 6, 2022.
    The movement drew support from various individuals and groups, including some with ties to far-right and conspiracy ideologies, which led to concerns about the presence of extremist symbols and rhetoric at protest sites.
    In response to the prolonged disruption, Prime Minister Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act on February 14, 2022, to empower law enforcement to clear blockades and restore order.
    It is important to note that some images circulating online, such as a 2019 convoy of trucks supporting Canada’s oil and gas industry (the “United We Roll” protest), were falsely presented as part of the 2022 Freedom Convoy.
    The 2019 event was unrelated to vaccine mandates and instead protested government energy policies.

    Canada convoy protest
    The Canada convoy protest, known as the Freedom Convoy (French: Convoi de la liberté) was a series of protests and blockades across Canada in early 2022, initially organized to oppose COVID-19 vaccine mandates for cross-border truck drivers. The movement quickly expanded to protest all COVID-19 restrictions and mandates. Beginning on January 22, 2022, hundreds of vehicles departed from various locations across Canada, converging in Ottawa on January 29 for a rally at Parliament Hill, joined by thousands of pedestrian protesters. Parallel demonstrations occurred in provincial capitals and at key border crossings with the United States.

    [25] The Canadian Truckers’ Convoy using GoFundMe

    Brave search engine summary: “Canadian truckers convoy using GoFundMe
    Canadian Truckers GoFundMe Convoy
    The Canadian “Freedom Convoy” protest, which began in January 2022, involved truckers and supporters traveling to Ottawa to protest federal COVID-19 vaccine mandates, particularly those affecting cross-border truck drivers.
    The organizers, Tamara Lich and B.J. Dichter, launched a GoFundMe campaign on January 14, 2022, to help cover expenses such as fuel, food, and lost wages for participants. The campaign quickly gained traction, raising over CA$5 million by January 25 and eventually surpassing CA$10 million before being suspended.
    GoFundMe initially placed a hold on the funds on January 24, stating that the organizers needed to demonstrate how the money would be properly distributed, in accordance with standard verification processes.
    This temporary freeze was also attributed to international banking regulations, according to the organizers. Despite the hold, GoFundMe later released an initial $1 million to the organizers after beginning its verification process.
    However, on February 5, 2022, GoFundMe announced it would no longer allow donations to the campaign and planned to redirect the funds to “verified charities” chosen by the organizers, unless donors requested refunds by February 19.
    This decision followed widespread concerns about the protest’s association with far-right groups, extremist views, and the occupation of Ottawa.
    In response to the GoFundMe suspension, the convoy organizers moved their fundraising efforts to alternative platforms. They partnered with CloutHub, which positioned itself as a censorship-resistant platform, and also began accepting direct e-transfers.
    Additionally, supporters raised over $9 million through GiveSendGo, another crowdfunding site known for hosting right-wing causes, which took in over $640,000 in platform fees from the donations. A separate effort using Bitcoin via the Tallycoin platform raised more than $450,000, allowing donors to bypass centralized payment systems.

    GoFundMe has frozen $4.5 Million in funds collected by protesting Canadian Truckers

    GoFundMe withholding $4.5 million from trucker convoy until plan presented” (Posted January 25, 2022 6:23 am)

    [26] Trudeau cutting off the CTC’s funding from GoFundMe

    Brave search engine summary: “Canadian truckers protest cut off from GoFundMe
    GoFundMe Cuts Truckers
    In early February 2022, GoFundMe froze a major fundraising campaign supporting the Canadian “Freedom Convoy” truckers’ protest against COVID-19 vaccine mandates, after it had raised over CA$10 million (US$7.96 million).
    The platform stated the fundraiser was paused and under review to ensure compliance with its terms of service, applicable laws, and regulations, particularly concerning the identity of the organizers, the use of funds, and whether the campaign promoted behavior in support of violence.
    GoFundMe later determined that the protest efforts violated its terms of service due to unlawful activity, leading the company to cut off funding for the organizers.
    Initially, GoFundMe announced plans to redirect the donated funds to charities of its choosing, a move that sparked widespread backlash and accusations of political bias and overreach. Facing legal threats from U.S. states like Texas and Florida, GoFundMe reversed its decision and committed to issuing refunds to donors instead.
    Following the shutdown of the GoFundMe campaign, protest organizers moved to the Christian-based fundraising platform GiveSendGo, which quickly raised millions more in donations.
    In response, the Ontario government obtained a court order to freeze access to those funds, asserting the protest had become an unlawful occupation. GiveSendGo pushed back, stating Canada had no jurisdiction over its U.S.-based operations and that funds were directly distributed to recipients.
    The incident drew significant political attention, with U.S. Republican figures such as Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis criticizing GoFundMe’s actions and defending the donations as support for a “worthy cause”.
    Canadian officials, including Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino, rebuked the foreign political involvement, emphasizing Canada’s sovereignty and rule of law.

    GoFundMe Cuts Off the Truckers

    GoFundMe Makes Controversial Move as Fundraising Campaign for Truckers Reaches Nearly US$8 Million

    [27] Trudeau cutting off the CTC’s funding from bitcoin exchanges

    Brave search engine summary: “Canadian truckers protest cut off from bitcoin exchange
    Canadian Truckers Protest Bitcoin Exchange
    Yes, the Canadian truckers’ protest was effectively cut off from traditional cryptocurrency exchanges. In February 2022, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and the Ontario Provincial Police issued an order requiring all regulated financial institutions, including cryptocurrency exchanges, to cease facilitating transactions with 34 specific crypto wallets linked to the protest.
    This action was taken under the authority of the Emergencies Act, which had been invoked by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to address the disruption caused by the ‘
    Freedom Convoy‘ protests.
    Exchanges like Kraken and Coinbase were directly targeted by these orders.
    Jesse Powell, CEO of Kraken, publicly stated that his exchange would comply with government requests to freeze and seize funds, emphasizing that they could not protect users from such actions. As a result, funds sent to these designated wallets were blocked from being traded or withdrawn through centralized exchanges.
    Despite these efforts, some funds were still moved. Blockchain analysis showed that portions of the donated cryptocurrency, including Bitcoin, were transferred to centralized exchanges like Coinbase and Crypto.com before the freeze orders took full effect.
    However, the government’s actions significantly disrupted the flow of funds, and the ability to use these assets was severely limited. The seizure of funds from a fundraiser’s wallet, where police obtained the seed phrase under a search warrant, further demonstrated the vulnerability of centralized custody.

    Government Crypto Powers in Spotlight After Canadian Trucker Protest Is Disbanded – Industry participants are divided when it comes to lawmakers’ ability to freeze bitcoin wallets

    Trucker crypto crackdown in Canada fuels GOP backlash in U.S. – At least one House GOP lawmaker has introduced a bill to prevent a similar government clampdown in the U.S.

    [28] The Canadian Truckers’ Convoy using bitcoin using QR codes

    Brave search engine summary: “Canadian truckers protest using bitcoin
    Canadian Truckers Use Bitcoin
    In early 2022, Canadian truckers participating in the “Freedom Convoy” protest against COVID-19 vaccine mandates turned to bitcoin for fundraising after traditional platforms blocked their campaigns.
    The protest, which began in late January, involved thousands of trucks converging on Ottawa and blocking key border crossings. Initially, supporters raised over C$10 million ($7.8 million) through a GoFundMe campaign, but the platform froze the funds, citing violations of its terms due to reports of unlawful activity.
    In response, a group of bitcoin advocates known as “HonkHonkHodl” launched a cryptocurrency fundraising campaign using the platform Tallycoin.
    This effort allowed donors to contribute via bitcoin on-chain and through the Lightning Network, emphasizing the censorship-resistant nature of the technology. Over 5,000 individuals from around the world donated approximately 21 bitcoin, valued at over $900,000 at the time. Among the notable contributors was Jesse Powell, CEO of Kraken, who donated 1 bitcoin in support.
    The use of bitcoin became a central narrative in the protest, illustrating how decentralized financial systems can bypass traditional restrictions.
    However, the Canadian government responded by invoking the Emergencies Act for the first time in history, granting authorities expanded powers to freeze bank accounts and attempt to seize cryptocurrency wallets linked to the protest. Authorities identified and sanctioned 34 crypto wallets—29 Bitcoin addresses and others across different blockchains—receiving more than 20 BTC (worth over $870,000).
    Despite these measures, the episode highlighted bitcoin’s role as a tool for financial sovereignty and resistance to state intervention.
    A police task force later seized some of the bitcoin funds, though control was eventually relinquished after legal challenges. The protest was disbanded by late February 2022, but its financial dynamics sparked ongoing debate about government power, financial censorship, and the utility of cryptocurrencies in political movements.

    Canadian Truckers Are Funded with Bitcoin After $10 Million GoFundMe Campaign Was Shut Down
    In Canada, truckers are protesting against vaccine mandates. A GoFundMe campaign in support of the protests was shut down. Subsequently, another fundraising campaign based on Bitcoin and the Lightning Network was initiated. With Tallycoin, a fundraiser of over 6 BTC, worth around $250,000 at the time of writing, from 3400+ individuals from all over the world is being conducted. This comes with advantages — such as privacy, censorship resistance, low transaction fees — and concerns. — Cedric Heidt, Philipp Sandner

    Bitcoin evangelists throw Canadian trucker protest donation lifeline after GoFundMe removal – ‘Don’t allow your voices to be silenced, and don’t allow your financial sovereignty to be trampled upon,’ says group
    Following the decision by GoFundMe to remove the donation campaign for the Canada “Freedom Convoy” trucker protest from its site, a group of Canadian libertarian bitcoin evangelists have thrown the group a lifeline.

    Honk, Honk, HODL: How Bitcoin Fueled The Freedom Convoy And Defied Government Crackdown

    Canadian Trucker Convoy Raises $450,000+ Using Bitcoin, Bypassing GoFundMe Restrictions

    [29] Using QR codes for bitcoin

    Without going into detail in this article, it is a very straightforward task to create a QR code that allows anyone to send bitcoin to a bitcoin wallet. Doing this makes the process less technical and easy to execute. There are plenty of sites which walk you through this easy process. For the curious, I provided high-level steps for creating and using a bitcoin QR code below:

    Brave search engine summary: “How to create a QR code for a bitcoin receiving address
    Create Bitcoin QR Code
    To create a QR code for a Bitcoin receiving address, start by obtaining your Bitcoin wallet’s public address from your wallet application.
    You can then use a dedicated QR code generator tool, such as those found on websites like ViralQR, QR Code Dynamic, or My QR Code, which allow you to input your Bitcoin address and optionally specify an amount to receive. These tools generate a scannable QR code that encodes the address, making it easy for others to send Bitcoin by simply scanning the code.
    The standard format for a Bitcoin QR code is bitcoin:address?amount=amount&label=label&message=message, where the parameters after the address are optional and should be URI-encoded.
    For example, you can generate a QR code using a Google Chart API link by replacing the address and adding parameters like amount and message, ensuring spaces are encoded as %20. Alternatively, you can use a bookmarklet or a local tool like qrencode to generate the QR code from the command line, which can be a more secure, offline method.
    Once generated, you can customize the appearance of the QR code by changing its colors, adding a logo, or adjusting the size and margin, which is useful for branding on business cards, websites, or marketing materials.
    It is crucial to verify the generated QR code by scanning it with a smartphone to ensure it correctly links to your intended Bitcoin address. Always double-check the address before sharing to prevent sending funds to the wrong destination. Some platforms, like My QR Code, offer dynamic QR codes that allow you to update the underlying Bitcoin address without regenerating the code, providing greater flexibility.

    Brave search engine summary: “How to scan a QR code for a bitcoin receiving address
    Scan QR Code Bitcoin Address
    To scan a QR code for a Bitcoin receiving address, follow these steps:
    1) Ensure you have a cryptocurrency wallet app installed on your smartphone that supports QR code scanning. Popular options include the Bitget Wallet, Blockchain.com Wallet, and others.
    2) Open your cryptocurrency wallet app and navigate to the “Receive” or “Deposit” section. This is where your unique Bitcoin address and its corresponding QR code are displayed.
    3) Activate the QR scanner within your wallet app. This is typically found as a button labeled “Scan” or “QR” near the “Receive” or “Deposit” screen.
    4) Point your device’s camera at the QR code. The app will automatically detect and scan the code, instantly populating the Bitcoin address field with the information stored in the QR code.
    5) Always double-check the scanned address to ensure it matches the intended recipient’s address before confirming any transaction.
    This step is crucial to prevent sending funds to the wrong wallet.
    6) Once you have verified the address and the amount (if specified in the QR code), proceed with the transaction as prompted by the app.
    The QR code typically contains the Bitcoin address, and may also include the amount to be sent or a message, encoded using the Bitcoin URI scheme.
    This method is faster and more accurate than manually entering the long, complex Bitcoin address.

    [30] Bitcoin miners’ fees
    Miners are paid a nominal transaction fee by the bitcoin senders to clear the transaction and make them irreversible.  For context, there are instances of parties sending millions of dollars’ worth of bitcoin for less than $5, fractions of a percent. All bitcoin transactions are permanently and irrevocably cleared in about 60 minutes. In comparison, credit card and bank transactions can be reversed months later (via chargebacks long after the initial settlement). [63]

    [31] My friend, “R.“, educating our MeetUp (“Bitcoin, Huntsville, Crypto, & Coffee“) about India
    A friend of mine, who I will simply call “R.“, lives in India and gave me some personal insights into this action by the Indian government. He explained how government intervention caused massive black markets to pop-up (the exact opposite intent of Prime Minister Modi). And, the poor and middle class were hamstrung during the transition period because they could not exchange their high denomination rupee notes for lower denominations quickly enough. Consequently, they lost significant and crucial parts of their purchasing power. All of this happened because one man had direct and pernicious control over the lives 1.4 billion people.

    [32] India demonetized the 1,000 and 500 Rupee notes

    Brave search engine summary: “India removes the 500 rupee note
    India Removes 500 Rupee Note
    India removed the 500 rupee note as legal tender starting from midnight on 8 November 2016, as part of a demonetization effort announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to combat corruption, black money, and counterfeit currency.
    Alongside the 1,000 rupee note, the 500 rupee note was withdrawn from circulation, and new 500 and 2,000 rupee notes were introduced to replace them. The old 500 rupee notes ceased to be valid, and the public was given a limited period to deposit or exchange them at banks.
    However, recent claims in 2025 suggesting a new phase-out of the 500 rupee note by 2026 have been officially debunked. The Indian government, through the Press Information Bureau (PIB) Fact Check, has clarified that there are no plans to discontinue the 500 rupee note, and it remains legal tender.
    Financial authorities, including the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), have not issued any directive to stop disbursing 500 rupee notes from ATMs, and the currency continues to be in active circulation.

    India withdraws 500 and 1,000 rupee notes in effort to fight corruption
    This article is more than 8 years old
    – Prime minister says country’s highest value banknotes will be taken out of circulation as part of clampdown on ‘black money’

    Shock as India scraps 500 and 1,000 rupee bank notes

    [33] Software is free speech

    Brave search engine summary: “court ruling that software is free speech
    Software Free Speech Ruling
    A federal appeals court ruled unanimously in 2005 that the First Amendment protects programming code, marking the first time a federal appellate court decided that computer programming languages are entitled to free speech protections. This decision in Junger v. Daley overturned a previous ruling that had deemed code more functional than expressive and therefore not protected under the First Amendment. The court recognized that programming languages, like French or German, are a form of language that communicates information to both computers and humans.
    This principle was further reinforced by earlier rulings in the 1990s, particularly in the case of Bernstein v. Department of State, where a court found that software source code is protected speech under the First Amendment. In that case, cryptographer Daniel Bernstein challenged export control laws that restricted the publication of encryption software, and the court ultimately ruled that such restrictions violated his First Amendment rights.
    More recently, courts have continued to affirm the protection of digital expression. In 2024, the Supreme Court emphasized that government regulation of how social media platforms curate content violates the First Amendment, underscoring the high level of protection afforded to online speech. However, in June 2025, the Supreme Court upheld a Texas law requiring age verification for accessing certain online sexual content, applying intermediate scrutiny and allowing restrictions that burden adults’ access to lawful speech, despite concerns about free speech and privacy implications.

    In Legal First, Federal Appeals Court is Unanimous: First Amendment Applies to Programming Code
    CLEVELAND, OH — The American Civil Liberties Union today lauded a first-ever ruling by a federal appeals court that the First Amendment protects documents written in computer programming languages.

    EFF at 25: Remembering the Case that Established Code as Speech
    One of EFF’s first major legal victories was Bernstein v. Department of Justice, a landmark case that resulted in establishing code as speech and changed United States export regulations on encryption software, paving the way for international e-commerce. We represented Daniel J. Bernstein, a Berkeley mathematics Ph.D. student, who wished to publish an encryption algorithm he developed, the source code for a program to run the algorithm, and a mathematical paper describing and explaining the algorithm.

    [34] Adding layers of security to a bitcoin wallet

    For those who are legitimately concerned about security, I can secure my wallet with SEVERAL LAYERS of security that are easy for me to create and unlock but EXTREMELY DIFFICULT (nigh impossible) for anyone else to crack. For the curious, I have provided a high-level set of steps that I can use to secure my bitcoin (this is a slight over-simplification but good enough for now):

    • I can protect my bitcoin wallet using a 256-bit password (“passphrase”).
    • Encrypt my wallet using a 1,024 bit encryption key.
    • Place the wallet in an encrypted virtual drive protected by another 1,024 bit encryption key.
    • Place the encrypted virtual drive using another 1,024 bit encryption key in a hidden partition on a physical hard drive or USB drive.

    To some you, that sounds like something very encumbered to manage. If you can, do a little research on YouTube on how to use VeraCrypt. It’s surprisingly straightforward, lightweight, and extremely effective.
    I can use military-grade encryption for all of this.  I can use free and open source code for the encryption (i.e. “VeraCrypt”).  With my proper access to the files, credentials, and keys, all of these layers can be unlocked and peeled back in less than two minutes with minimal effort but would take more time than the existence of the universe to hack.  This would effectively be a 3,328 bit encryption key (256 + 1,024 + 1,024 + 1,024 = 3,328).
    You might have legitimate concerns about losing your wallet. Making extremely secure back-ups is a cinch. After following the above-mentioned steps, I can use the following to create many reliable and secure back-ups:

    • Make multiple copies of the virtual drive on various USB thumb drives
    • Place those USB thumb drives in different locations that only I know about and can easily access
    • Place the virtual drive on an online drive that I control
    • Leave one of the USB drives with my estate planning attorney / executor

    [35] The “Ultimate Supply Cap & Programmatic Inflation Rate” graph layout

    The Horizontal Axes
    We have two horizontal x-axes, a lower axis and upper axis. Both the blue line and orange line correspond to both horizontal axes. Both horizontal axes approximately represents time. [71] (Technically, it represents the number of bitcoin transaction blocks on the bitcoin blockchain but more on that in a later article.) The lower horizontal x-axis represents the number of blocks on the bitcoin blockchain.  The best way that I can describe “blockchain” is:

    • It is a publicly available “accounting ledger” of all of the bitcoin transactions
    • The blockchain is comprised of “blocks” which are analogous to a single page in an accounting ledger
    • Each block (page) contains many rows of bitcoin transactions which record bitcoin moving from one account to another
    • All of the blocks are bound together in a specific order (in time)

    The lower x-axis shows the numbers “210”, “420”, “630”, etc., but each of these must be multiplied by 1,000 to show the actual number of blocks (“ledger pages“) that are in the blockchain at that time.  As of now (2025), there are ~900,000 blocks which have been put into this massive ledger we call the bitcoin blockchain.  So, we can think of this as a huge accounting ledger with roughly 900K pages in it and it continues to grow every ten minutes.
    Of course, as humans, we don’t think in terms of “blocks on the blockchain“.  Thus, we need to relate this to the traditional way in which we think of the x-axis on a graph, time.  This is where the upper x-axis comes into play.  In this case, every 210,000 blocks on the bitcoin blockchain very closely represents 4 years. For now, we won’t get into how 210K blocks represent 4 years in this article (in future articles we will revisit it often).  But, in order to equate blocks on the blockchain to time, we would trace vertically from the lower axis to the upper axis.  For example, if we were to trace from “630” (630,000) on the lower axis vertically to the upper axis then we would land on the year “2021”.

    Nerd Note:  The method that the inventor of bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto [2] created to ensure that 210,000 blocks would be added to the blockchain almost exactly every 4 years is called the “Difficulty Adjustment”. [68] Just like so many other aspects of bitcoin, the Difficulty Adjustment is a fascinating topic that we will cover in future articles.
    For context, the Difficulty Adjustment is the first time in human history where we have had what is called in economics “perfectly inelastic supply” [39] which means that the supply of a product which is produced is completely independent of demand and price. Without going into any depth right now, the new supply of bitcoin does NOT change in accordance with increased demand. Therefore, the only thing that can change with increased demand is price.
    In my humble opinion, considering that economists have thought that perfect ubiquitous supply inelasticity was impossible, the ability to create perfect supply inelasticity was a stroke of pure genius.  I think you will agree when you see how Nakamoto did it and with such simplicity.

    The Vertical Axes
    Let’s take a look at the vertical y-axis.  In this case, we also have two axes.  The orange line corresponds with the left axis and the blue line with the right axis. Along the left side, we can see the inflation rate (as a percent) or, to be more exact, the rate at which new bitcoin are added to the existing supply of bitcoin (the amount of new bitcoin created in one year divided by all of the bitcoin created in all of the previous years). In this case, it is expressed as a percentage per year, or the amount of new bitcoin divided by the supply of bitcoin that was already in existence. You’ll notice that the orange line gets progressively closer to the zero line.
    The orange line has distinct step-down’s.  This happens every four years (every 210,000 blockchain blocks).  Each step-down is called a “halving”. [70] In short, a halving is the reduction by half (50%) in the number of new bitcoin which are introduced to the system, a reduction in the inflation rate. So, if the current bitcoin inflation rate happens to be 4%, then after a halving, the inflation rate would reduce by half to 2%. These halvings will occur every 4 years until ~2140. Currently (2025), the network issues 3.125 new bitcoin (approximately) every 10 minutes (which comes to 450 bitcoin per day).
    The inflation started high (100%) but that came down very quickly after that (i.e. 100% in year 2, 50% in year 3, 33% in year 4, etc.). As a recent real example, it decreased from 1.8% to 0.9% around 04/20/2024.  It happened and no one had to make it happen.  It was automatic without any interfering politicians, bureaucrats, or bankers. How many of us would pay good money to watch a politician cut the inflation rate in half because it’s the right thing to do?
    For context, we in the U.S. sometimes experience 0.9% in a single month!  Other countries have experienced that in a week, sometimes in a day, or even in a single hour! [69]
    On the vertical y-axis on the right side, representing the blue line, we have the total amount of bitcoin which have been created (“mined” or have been brought into cryptographic existence). [72] The right axis has the numbers “5“, “10“, “15“, “20“, but there is the multiplier of “millions”.  For example, “5” would be 5,000,000 bitcoin (“bitcoin tokens”).
    You’ll notice that the blue line is always increasing yet bending downward. It’s not easy to detect but that blue line will never go above 21,000,000 (21M). This is important; this 21M is what we call the Ultimate Supply Cap. Around the year 2140, the very last tiny fraction of bitcoin will be “mined” (introduced to the monetary system).  After that point, no more bitcoin will be added to the existing supply of bitcoin.

    Nerd Note:  The word “bitcoin” is both the singular and plural form, similar to “sheep” and “deer“.  Many people innocently mistakenly use the term “bitcoins“.

    Nerd Note: We will cover the topic of bitcoin “mining” in future articles.

    [36] The numbers of satoshi’s in a bitcoin

    One bitcoin can be sub-divided into 100,000,000 smaller units called “satoshi’s” or “sat’s”. This smaller unit was named after the inventor, “Satoshi Nakamoto[2] As an analogy, the U.S. dollar can be subdivided into small units, pennies.

    [37] Trying to create more than 21M bitcoin

    If anyone asks you (with a not-so-small amount of snark and sarcasm) how you can possibly verify that there will never be more than 21M bitcoin, you can tell them that anyone can audit the code at GitHub.com! We covered the ability to audit the bitcoin code in a previous article here, in the section “Trust… But Verify“. Tell your detractor to DYOR, Do Your Own Research, and go look at the code.
    If anyone tries to create more bitcoin on top of the 21M, the rest of the bitcoin holders will reject those transactions and those people will be left in the cold, a pariah to be ostracized by everyone else until they play by the same fair and equitable rules as everyone else.
    All miners and bitcoin participants would simply reject these illegitimate bitcoin. All of the work that some bad actor put into creating those faux bitcoin would immediately go to waste. Thus, there is no “enforcement” of the bitcoin rules necessary; nature and mathematics are the “enforcers” of the bitcoin rules. Unlike having to pay police officers to enforce the law, no costs are incurred by the rest of the bitcoin community to ensure that the bitcoin rules are being followed. This is in stark contrast to our current fiat currency standard which requires inordinate costs (both direct and indirect) to try to enforce. Everyone has the proper incentive to follow the rules. [73]

    [38] Milton Friedman’s famous quote on the singular cause of inflation

    Milton Friedman had a great quote about price inflation, “Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.
    https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7216580-inflation-is-always-and-everywhere-a-monetary-phenomenon
    Milton Friedman Teaches Monetary Policy

    [39] Economic elasticity

    In the case of bitcoin, its supply is considered to be “perfectly inelastic“.

    Definition of Price Elasticity of Supply
    In economics, elasticity is a summary measure of how the supply or demand of a particular good is influenced by changes in price. Elasticity is defined as a proportionate change in one variable over the proportionate change in another variable:

    Elasticity = (% Change In Quantity) / (% Change In Price)

    The price elasticity of supply (PES) is the measure of the responsiveness in quantity supplied (QS) to a change in price for a specific good (% Change QS / % Change in Price). There are numerous factors that directly impact the elasticity of supply for a good including stock, time period, availability of substitutes, and spare capacity. The state of these factors for a particular good will determine if the price elasticity of supply is elastic or inelastic in regards to a change in price.

    [40] Perfectly inelastic supply

    Brave search engine summary “perfectly inelastic supply
    Perfectly Inelastic Supply
    A perfectly inelastic supply curve is one where the quantity supplied does not change with the price, and the supply curve is vertical.
    This means producers cannot alter the quantity supplied regardless of price changes. For example, the Mona Lisa painting by Leonardo da Vinci has a perfectly inelastic supply curve because it is unique and cannot be duplicated at any price. In a market with a perfectly inelastic supply curve, an excise tax results in an increase in the price paid by consumers equal to the amount of the tax per unit, with no change in the quantity bought and sold.

    Perfectly Inelastic Supply
    The Mona Lisa painting by Leonardo da Vinci has a perfectly inelastic supply curve. There is only one Mona Lisa painting, and it cannot be duplicated at any price.
    Because the Mona Lisa is unique, it will always have a perfectly inelastic supply. In most cases, time has a great influence on the elasticity of supply. Production of some goods or services cannot be increased in the very short term. Time provides greater elasticity in the production of almost all goods and services. Over time management can invest in the labor and equipment to increase production, or lay off workers and find other uses for their plant and equipment If prices fall.

    [41] There are more than enough bitcoin to go around

    For anyone who is concerned that 21M are not enough for everyone in the world (~8 billion people), keep in mind that each individual bitcoin can be subdivided into 100,000,000 (100M) [36] smaller parts called “satoshi’s” or “sats“.  This is just like one U.S. dollar being subdivided into 100 pennies.  If we do the math (21,000,000 bitcoin X 100,000,000 satoshi’s per bitcoin) then we end up with 2,100,000,000,000,000 (2.1 quadrillion) satoshi’s  or individual units.  Yes, that seems like a huge number but keep in mind that each satoshi is a tiny unit.  Ultimately, that means the global average would be ~250,000 satoshi’s per person.  Plenty of sats to go around!
    To clarify, having 2.1 quadrillion sats does not mean the supply has been inflated. If we remember what Milton Friedman said about the true cause of inflation [38] then it’s not the number of units that is a problem; it’s the growth of the number of units that is the real problem.

    [42] The use of the phrases “quantitative easing“, “injecting liquidity“, and “bank bailouts

    When we use terms such as “quantitative easing” and “injecting liquidity” this effectively means that the government and central bank are increasing the number of currency units; they’re inflating the currency supply. This is true inflation. We covered how governments do that here, here, and here. To put this in context, ever time you hear “quantitative easing” or “injecting liquidity” then you should immediately translate that to, “We’re stealing the purchasing power right out of your wallets and bank accounts by inflating the money supply and making the price of everything you buy more expensive.
    When the government and the Federal Reserve use the term “bank bailouts” you should immediately translate that to, “We’re stealing the value directly from your wallets giving it to financial institutions which were irresponsible, unethical, or both.
    In the context of bitcoin’s Ultimate Supply Cap & Programmatic Inflation Rate, removing the state’s and the central banks’ ability to control the money supply completely eliminates their ability to steal from you and to force you support people and institutions who do not represent your values and ethics.

    [43] WWII war bonds

    In order to fund its military expenditures during World War II, the U.S. had to sell “war bonds”. These were loans that the U.S. federal government had to ask for from the public in order to pay for the war effort. There were enormous efforts that the federal government had to expend in order to ask the public, hat in hand, lend it money.
    Let’s roll forward from the 1940’s about two decades to the 1960’s: the U.S. no longer has to sell war bonds in order to fund its massive military efforts and hugely growing entitlement programs. This has persisted all the way into the present (2025).
    What happened? What changed? Why were war bonds required prior to 1965 and yet no longer afterwards?? Because the U.S. was still somewhat on a hard money standard during WWII and quickly fell off of that hard money standard going into the 1960’s and 1970’s. At that point, whenever the federal government needed funds, it simply inflated the money supply and took the value from you in order to fund its global military and domestic entitlement programs.

    Brave search engine summary: “What were U.S. war bonds
    U.S. War Bonds
    U.S. war bonds were government-issued debt securities designed to finance military operations during times of war, primarily used to fund the United States’ involvement in World War I and World War II. Initially introduced as Defense Bonds in 1941, they were renamed War Bonds following the attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941, signifying the U.S.’s full engagement in World War II. These bonds functioned as loans from citizens to the government, with the promise of repayment at face value upon maturity, typically after 10 to 40 years, depending on the issue date. They were sold at a discount—usually between 50% and 75% of their face value—and did not pay periodic interest, making them zero-coupon bonds; investors profited from the difference between the purchase price and the face value at maturity.
    The U.S. government launched a massive nationwide campaign to promote war bond purchases, leveraging patriotic appeals and extensive advertising across radio, newspapers, magazines, and film newsreels. Celebrities like Bette Davis, Rita Hayworth, and the Andrew Sisters, along with artists like Norman Rockwell and composers like Irving Berlin, played key roles in the effort, with songs like “Any Bonds Today?” becoming iconic. The campaign included bond drives, school and community group participation, and even special events like baseball games and movie screenings where bond purchases were required for admission. The effort was highly successful, with over 85 million Americans purchasing bonds worth more than $180 billion during World War II, representing nearly a fifth of the total war expenditure.
    The bonds were also available in small denominations, including War Stamps starting at 10 cents, allowing even children and low-income citizens to contribute. The Series E War Savings Bonds, introduced during WWII, were eventually replaced by Series EE Savings Bonds in 1980, but the original Series E bonds continued to accrue interest until 2010. The U.S. government still allows the redemption of these old bonds through its online savings bond calculator tool.

    [44] Frederick Hayek’s quote on hard money and “sly or roundabout way

    Famous Austrian school economist, Friedrich Hayek, had a famous quote in 1984 where he proposed that the only way that money could be taken out of the hands of government was in some, “sly, roundabout way”. This has become a common phrase in the bitcoin community. The full quote is:

    I don’t believe that we shall ever have good money again before we take the thing out of the hands of government because we can’t take them violently out of the hands of government.  All we can do is by some sly or roundabout way introduce something they can’t stop.” — Friederick A. Hayek

    You can view the original interview below:

    In addition, much of the idea of removing the money supply from the hands of the state was developed in his book “Denationalisation Of Money” (10/01/1976).

    [45] The “What Is Money” podcast

    You can learn more about the “What Is Money” podcast here.

    [46] Ignorant anti-bitcoiners acting in bad faith and promoting fear, uncertainty, and doubt (“FUD“)

    • Dave Ramsey: real estate mogul, personal finance guru, and radio talk show host
    • Peter Schiff: President and founder of the EuroPacific Fund
    • Jamie Dimon: President & CEO – JP Morgan Chase Bank
    • Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger: President & Vice President – Berkshire Hathaway

    [47] Capitalism And Freedom” by Milton Friedman

    You can pick up the book hereCapitalism And Freedom” by Milton Friedman

    Capitalism And Freedom
    Capitalism and Freedom is a book by Milton Friedman originally published in 1962 by the University of Chicago Press which discusses the role of economic capitalism in liberal society. It has sold more than half a million copies since 1962 and has been translated into eighteen languages.
    Friedman argues for economic freedom as a precondition for political freedom. He defines “liberal” in European Enlightenment terms, contrasting with an American usage that he believes has been corrupted since the Great Depression.
    The book identifies several places in which a free market can be promoted for both philosophical and practical reasons. Among other concepts, Friedman advocates ending the mandatory licensing of physicians and introducing a system of vouchers for school education.

    [61] Metallica v. Napster, Inc.

    Brave search engine summary: “Lars Ulrich Napster
    Lars Ulrich, the drummer of Metallica, took a strong stance against Napster, a peer-to-peer file-sharing service, in 2000 when he discovered that a demo of Metallica’s song “I Disappear” was circulating on the platform before its official release. This led Metallica to file a lawsuit against Napster, arguing that the service was enabling users to exchange copyrighted MP3 files without permission.
    Many people criticized Lars for his actions at the time, believing that file sharing was a right and not willing to pay for music.
    However, some artists, including Corey Taylor of Slipknot and David Ellefson of Megadeth, have since defended Lars, stating that he was right about Napster and that the band’s actions were necessary to protect artists’ rights.
    In 2001, Napster settled the lawsuits with Metallica and Dr. Dre, but the Napster service ultimately filed for bankruptcy due to the fallout from the lawsuits.
    Despite the controversy, Metallica’s lawsuit is considered a landmark case that helped redefine how we listen to music.
    Lars himself has since reflected on the situation, expressing regret for not educating himself better about Napster and the broader implications of digital music distribution.

    Metallica v. Napster, Inc.
    Metallica, et al. v. Napster, Inc. was a 2000 U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California case[1] that focused on copyright infringement, racketeering, and unlawful use of digital audio interface devices. Metallica vs. Napster, Inc. was the first case that involved an artist suing a peer-to-peer file sharing (“P2P”) software company.

    [62] Iran shuts down internet access in their country

    Brave search engine summary “Iran internet shutdown
    Iran Internet Shutdown
    Iran has frequently shut down the internet to suppress protests and control information. The most notable internet blackout occurred in November 2019, lasting from November 16 to November 23, as a response to the 2019–2020 Iranian protests.
    During this period, Iranian citizens could only access the National Information Network (NIN), which allowed some government services and local apps to remain operational. Internet shutdowns have continued since then, with Iran ranking third globally in the number of internet shutdowns in 2022. These actions have significant economic impacts, costing Iran approximately $773 million in 2022.

    Iranians Sustain Huge Losses Due To Government Internet Shutdowns
    Amid reports that Iranians have lost more than $770 million due to deliberate government internet outages in 2022, authorities try to play down the impact.
    Iranian Minister of Information and Communications Technology Issa Zarepour said Friday that there is no accurate data regarding the damage from internet access restrictions. However, independent VPN review website Top10VPN said in its annual that the economic impact was about $773 million in 2022.

    FEATURE-Iran steps up internet crackdown one year after Mahsa Amini death
    INTERNET SHUTDOWNS HAVE ECONOMIC COSTS
    Already struggling with international sanctions, high inflation and unemployment, internet shutdowns cost Iran an additional $773 million last year, digital privacy research group TOP10VPN estimated.
    The impact is felt by small businesses across the country.
    “We haven’t had one day without the internet causing some sort of problem. It’s impossible to have a normal life in these conditions,” said Saeed Souzangar, who said he was struggling to keep his Tehran technology company afloat.

    [63] Credit card transactions being reversed many months later

    Brave search engine summary: “How long can credit card chargebacks happen after settlement
    Credit Card Chargeback Time Limit
    The timeframe for filing a credit card chargeback after a transaction has been settled generally ranges from 60 to 120 days from the date of the transaction, depending on the card network and the reason for the dispute.
    For most disputes, including those related to fraud, billing errors, or goods not received, the standard window is 120 days. However, for certain cases like “
    Credit Not Processed,” banks must wait 15 days after the credit document date or the date services were terminated before processing a chargeback. While the Fair Credit Billing Act (FCBA) mandates a minimum of 60 days for disputing a charge, many issuers allow up to 120 days. There is a rare exception allowing disputes up to 540 days from the transaction date if the cardholder only realized they hadn’t received goods or services after that time, though this is uncommon and typically applies to pre-paid or long-term service agreements.

    [64] appeal our better angels

    Brave search engine summary: “appeal to our better angels
    Appeal to Our Better Angels
    The phrase ‘appeal to our better angels’ originates from Abraham Lincoln in 1861. Lincoln used it to urge Americans to maintain their bonds of affection and unity despite the tensions and divisions of the time. The phrase suggests that people should strive to act with higher virtues and resist base tendencies, appealing to their more enlightened and compassionate nature.
    The context of Lincoln’s speech was the secession of several Southern states and the looming threat of civil war. He hoped that by appealing to the ‘better angels of our nature,’ the nation could avoid conflict and preserve the Union.
    Since Lincoln’s time, the phrase has been used in various contexts to encourage people to rise above their differences and act with kindness and understanding.
    It has been adopted by organizations, books, and media as a call for unity and moral improvement.
    In summary, ‘appeal to our better angels‘ is a call to summon one’s highest moral and compassionate qualities, as expressed by Lincoln and echoed in various forms since then.

    [65] Politicians claim only criminals use bitcoin

    Brave search engine summary “which public figures claim only criminals use bitcoin
    Public Figures on Bitcoin Use
    Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan Chase, has stated that if you were in certain countries like Venezuela or Ecuador, or if you were a drug dealer or murderer, you would be better off doing transactions in bitcoin than in US dollars.
    Additionally, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has referenced cryptocurrencies as a particular concern for terrorist financing, suggesting that cryptocurrencies are mainly used for illicit financing.

    Fact or Fiction: Crypto is the currency of criminals
    One of the most common criticisms of cryptocurrency is that it is the currency of criminals. Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, the biggest bank in the US, famously said ‘If you were in Venezuela or Ecuador or North Korea or a bunch of parts like that, or if you were a drug dealer, a murderer, stuff like that, you are better off doing it in bitcoin than US dollars,’

    The False Narrative Of Bitcoin’s Role In Illicit Activity
    Speaking at a Senate Finance Committee hearing today, Janet Yellen, President-elect Joe Biden’s pick for Secretary of the Treasury, stated cryptocurrencies are ‘a particular concern‘ when it comes to criminal activity and terrorist financing.
    Yellen continued, ‘I think many (cryptocurrencies) are used, at least in a transaction sense, mainly for illicit financing. And I think we really need to examine ways in which we can curtail their use, and make sure that anti-money laundering (sic) doesn’t occur through those channels.

    [66] How big is the illicit drug trade?

    Since so many politicians and leaders of financial institutions have publicly stated that bitcoin is “only used for crime and drug deals“, I wanted to bring attention that the real problem here is not bitcoin but our global fiat currency system. Specifically, the vast majority (99%+) of global crime and drug deals are committed using fiat currencies, not bitcoin. People who say that bitcoin’s only use is for crime and illegal drugs are lying and deliberately not telling the whole story.

    Brave search engine summary: “What is the global value of illegal drug trade in us dollars
    Global Value of Illegal Drug Trade
    The global value of the value of the illegal drug trade is estimated to be between $32 billion and $652 billion annually. More specifically, the UNODC reported that the global illicit drug market was valued between $426 billion and $652 billion in 2014. Additionally, [the] RAND Corporation estimated that Americans spent nearly $150 billion annually on illicit drugs in 2016.

    Illegal Drug Trade
    The illegal drug trade, drug trafficking, or narcotrafficking is a global black market dedicated to the cultivation, manufacture, distribution and sale of prohibited drugs. Most jurisdictions prohibit trade, except under license, of many types of drugs through the use of drug prohibition laws. The think tank Global Financial Integrity’s Transnational Crime and the Developing World report estimates the size of the global illicit drug market between US$426 and US$652  billion in 2014 that is equal to the UK’s national debt alone. With a world GDP of US$78 trillion in the same year, the illegal drug trade may be estimated as nearly 1% of total global trade. Consumption of illegal drugs is widespread globally, and it remains very difficult for local authorities to reduce the rates of drug consumption.

    Americans’ Spending on Illicit Drugs Nears $150 Billion Annually; Appears to Rival What Is Spent on Alcohol
    Spending on cannabis, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine by Americans reached nearly $150 billion in 2016, with a large proportion of spending coming from the small share of people who use drugs on a daily or near-daily basis, according to a new RAND Corporation report.

    [67] Global value of crime in U.S. dollars

    Below, I have placed several articles and references regarding global crime to highlight the fact that the VAST MAJORITY of crime happens with fiat currency, not bitcoin. This is in stark contrast to the outlandish claims that politicians and traditional finance titans make regarding bitcoin’s “only use” is for criminal activity. One could argue that the biggest crime perpetrated upon the people of the world is the requirement by all governments that fiat currencies be used, giving all governments the ability to steal the life’s savings of their citizens. Overall, actual criminal activity in fiat currency is MANY orders of magnitude greater than what bitcoin could ever be.

    Brave search engine summary “What is the global value of crime in us dollars
    Global Value of Crime
    The aggregate cost of crime in the United States is significant, with an estimated value of $4.9 trillion reported in 2021.

    Crime in the United States
    The aggregate cost of crime in the United States is significant, with an estimated value of $4.9 trillion reported in 2021.

    The Aggregate Cost of Crime in the United States
    Estimates of crime’s burden inform public and private decisions about crime-prevention measures. More than counts of criminal offenses, the aggregate cost of crime conveys the scale of problems from crime and the value of deterrence. This article offers an estimate of the total annual cost of crime in the United States, including the direct costs of law enforcement, criminal justice, and victims’ losses and the indirect costs of private deterrence, fear and agony, and time lost to avoidance and recovery. The findings update crime-cost estimates of past decades while expanding the scope of coverage to include categories missing from past studies. The estimated annual cost of crime is $4.71–$5.76 trillion including transfers from victims to criminals and $2.86–$3.92 trillion net of transfers.

    • Anderson, David A. (November 2021). “The Aggregate Cost of Crime in the United States“. Journal of Law and Economics. 64 (4): 857–885. doi:10.1086/715713. S2CID 246635242. Retrieved March 6, 2022.

    Brave search engine summary “What is the global value of crime in dollars
    Global Crime Value in Dollars
    The global value of transnational crime is estimated at $1.6 trillion to $2.2 trillion annually, according to a report by Global Financial Integrity released in March 2019.
    This includes various illicit industries such as counterfeiting, drug trafficking, and illegal logging, among others. The report highlights that high profits and low risks for criminals, combined with a global shadow financial system, perpetuate these criminal activities.

    Transnational Crime is a $1.6 trillion to $2.2 trillion Annual ‘Business’, Finds New GFI Report
    Globally the business of transnational crime is valued at an average of $1.6 trillion to $2.2 trillion annually, according to a new report released today by Global Financial Integrity (GFI), a Washington DC-based research and advisory organization. Titled “Transnational Crime and the Developing World,” the study highlights that the combination of high profits and low risks for perpetrators of transnational crime and the support of a global shadow financial system perpetuate and drive these abuses.

    Transnational Crime and the Developing World
    This March 2017 report from Global Financial Integrity, “Transnational Crime and the Developing World,” finds that globally the business of transnational crime is valued at an average of $1.6 trillion to $2.2 trillion annually. The study evaluates the overall size of criminal markets in 11 categories: the trafficking of drugs, arms, humans, human organs, and cultural property; counterfeiting, illegal wildlife crime, illegal fishing, illegal logging, illegal mining, and crude oil theft.

    Transnational Crime
    This March 2017 report from Global Financial Integrity, “Transnational Crime and the Developing World,” finds that globally the business of transnational crime is valued at an average of $1.6 trillion to $2.2 trillion annually. The study evaluates the overall size of criminal markets in 11 categories: the trafficking of drugs, arms, humans, human organs, and cultural property; counterfeiting, illegal wildlife crime, illegal fishing, illegal logging, illegal mining, and crude oil theft. Counterfeiting ($923 billion to $1.13 trillion) and drug trafficking ($426 billion to $652 billion) have the highest and second-highest values, respectively; illegal logging is the most valuable natural resource crime ($52 billion to $157 billion).

    [68] The bitcoin Difficulty Adjustment

    Brave search engine summary: “What is the bitcoin difficulty adjustment
    Bitcoin Difficulty Adjustment
    The Bitcoin difficulty adjustment is a mechanism that ensures a new block is added to the blockchain approximately every 10 minutes, maintaining a consistent block creation rate regardless of changes in the network’s total computing power.
    This adjustment occurs automatically every 2,016 blocks, which is roughly every two weeks. The network calculates the difficulty for the next epoch based on the actual time it took to mine the previous 2,016 blocks compared to the expected time of 20,160 minutes (2 weeks). If the blocks were mined faster than the target time, the difficulty increases to make mining harder; if they took longer, the difficulty decreases to make mining easier. The adjustment factor is proportional to the difference between the actual and expected time, but it is capped at a maximum change of four times the current difficulty level to prevent abrupt shifts. This self-correcting system is crucial for preserving Bitcoin’s predictable issuance schedule and its intended monetary policy, ensuring that the rate of new Bitcoin creation remains stable even as mining technology advances.

    [69] High inflation

    With regards to the concept of “inflation”, in common usage, we mean “price inflation“.  Our usual way of measuring price inflation is the federal government statistic called the “Consumer Price Inflation” or “CPI“.  There are many legitimate complaints about the CPI as a measure of price inflation because of the way that it has been manipulated, mutated, deformed, and constructed in bad faith over the past five decades.  Without going into any sort of detail, I agree with the majority of those criticisms.  In my opinion, a more realistic measure of price inflation can be found at Shadow Stats (www.ShadowStats.com).  The operators of this website have a more consistent, holistic, and realistic method of measuring price inflation.  I highly recommend visiting their site.  I think it will put the concept of price inflation into proper context.  If you really want to nerd-out then do some research into the “M2 Money Supply“.  In short, it is the growing M2 Money Supply which actually creates price inflation. Please see the above note regarding Milton Friedman and his quote on the true cause of inflation.

    [70] The bitcoin halving

    The bitcoin halving is a reduction by half in the number of bitcoin that are awarded to a miner for successfully discovering (“mining”) a bitcoin block on the bitcoin blockchain. These halving events occur every four years and are considered significant in the bitcoin community. The current (2025) bitcoin reward for mining a bitcoin block is 3.125 bitcoin. Around 03/2028, that reward will be cut in half to 1.5625 bitcoin. This reward of bitcoin to a miner is inflationary (currently about 1%) but is cut in half at every bitcoin halving event. Thus, in March of 2028, the inflation rate will programmatically drop from 1% to 0.5%.

    Nerd Note: For the curious, the method that the blockchain is able to measure four years is fascinating!  While we can’t cover this topic now, we will get into that topic in future articles.

    Brave search engine summary:  “bitcoin halving
    Bitcoin Halving
    The last Bitcoin halving is happened in April 2024, reducing the block reward from 6.25 to 3.125 bitcoins.
    This event, which happens approximately every four years or after 210,000 blocks are mined, is a key feature of Bitcoin’s monetary policy designed to control inflation and ensure scarcity. The halving of the block reward is expected to limit the supply of new bitcoins entering the market, which could increase scarcity and potentially raise the price if demand remains strong. However, the exact impact on the price is uncertain and depends on market conditions.
    Historically, Bitcoin’s price has shown significant increases following halving events.
    For example, after the halving in May 2020, the price of Bitcoin surged from $6,877.62 to $8,821 at the time of the event and continued to rise to reach $49,504 by May 2021.
    The fourth halving event occurred on April 20, 2024, at block height 840,000.
    The next halving is expected to happen on March 26, 2028, at block height 1,050,000.
    Bitcoin halvings are important for traders because they reduce the number of new bitcoins being generated by the network, which can impact the price.
    Traders can speculate on the price of Bitcoin using derivatives such as CFDs or buy the coins outright via an exchange.
    The total supply of Bitcoin is capped at 21 million coins, and the halving process will continue until all coins are mined, which is estimated to happen around the year 2140.

    [71] Blockchain time

    Technically, it represents the number of bitcoin transaction blocks on the bitcoin blockchain but we’ll cover that in a later article. In the bitcoin whitepaper, Satoshi called the blockchain a “timechain“.

    [72] Bitcoin mining

    In regards to “bitcoin mining“, we use the terms “mined” or “mining” as a convenient way of describing a vital function of the bitcoin network.  In short, newly “mined” bitcoin are simply bitcoin that are introduced into the existing supply of bitcoin. We can’t go into the topic of bitcoin mining now but we will cover this subject in many future articles.  Suffice it to say that bitcoin mining is a fascinating topic!

    [73] Following the rules because it’s in their own best interest

    For those who are interested in the concept of “following the rules because it is in their own best interest” I recommend looking into the concepts of “Game Theory[74] and “Schelling Point” [16]
    Ultimately, it’s about people voluntarily choosing to follow the rules because it’s in their own best interest. This is the ultimate in system design and engineering; creating incentives where people follow the rules because it is in their own best interest and not because of some enforcer.

    [74] Game Theory

    Game Theory
    Game theory is the study of mathematical models of strategic interactions.[1] It has applications in many fields of social science, and is used extensively in economics, logic, systems science and computer science.[2] Initially, game theory addressed two-person zero-sum games, in which a participant’s gains or losses are exactly balanced by the losses and gains of the other participant. In the 1950s, it was extended to the study of non zero-sum games, and was eventually applied to a wide range of behavioral relations. It is now an umbrella term for the science of rational decision making in humans, animals, and computers.

    Brave search engine summary: “game theory summary
    Game Theory Summary
    Game theory is a mathematical framework used to model strategic interactions among rational decision-makers, known as players, where the outcome for each player depends on the actions of all others. It provides tools to analyze situations involving cooperation, conflict, and competition across diverse fields such as economics, biology, political science, psychology, and computer science. The core elements of a game include players, their available strategies, the information they possess, the sequence of moves, and their preferences over the possible outcomes.
    The theory originated with John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern’s 1944 book The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, initially focusing on zero-sum games—situations where one player’s gain is exactly balanced by another’s loss. It was later extended to non-zero-sum games, which allow for mutual gains or losses, reflecting more complex real-world interactions. A central concept in game theory is the Nash equilibrium, where no player can benefit by unilaterally changing their strategy, given the strategies of the others. This equilibrium concept helps predict stable outcomes in strategic scenarios.
    Game theory distinguishes between different types of games, including simultaneous-move games (where players act at the same time) and sequential-move games (where players act in turn, with later players aware of earlier actions). In sequential games, players use backward induction to look ahead and reason back to determine optimal strategies. In simultaneous games, the logical challenge of mutual anticipation—“
    I think that he thinks that I think…”—is resolved through equilibrium analysis.
    The theory also examines strategic behaviors such as dominant and dominated strategies, where a dominant strategy is always optimal regardless of others’ choices, and a dominated strategy is always inferior. In some cases, like the prisoner’s dilemma, the Nash equilibrium leads to a collectively suboptimal outcome, highlighting the tension between individual rationality and group welfare. To achieve cooperation in repeated interactions, strategies like tit-for-tat are often effective.
    Game theory has practical applications in business strategy, auctions, negotiations, pricing decisions, and even military and diplomatic planning. It helps predict competitor responses and design optimal strategies, especially in oligopolistic markets. However, its predictions can be limited by the assumption of perfect rationality, as real-world decisions are often influenced by emotions, social norms, and bounded rationality.
    In essence, game theory is the science of strategy, aiming to understand and predict how rational agents make decisions in interdependent situations.

  • Bitcoin: The Ultimate Freedom Accelerator, Pt. 3.2 – What Is Bitcoin?

    Previously

    In the previous article, here, we looked at prominent industry leaders and institutions which have taken the plunge of acquiring bitcoin in significant quantities. We also noted BitcoinTreasuries, a great web resource which tracks notable bitcoin ownership for a wide variety of institutions and countries.

    Now, let’s dive into why we’re all here – the question of, “What is bitcoin?

    What Is Bitcoin?

    This is my working definition of bitcoin:

    A decentralized, intangible, digital asset which can be used as un-confiscatable and un-censorable property, has all nine attributes and three functions of good money, requires no central authority, and utilizes a trustless methodology via cryptography for ensuring that all trades & exchanges are cleared and accounted for accurately, promptly, and globally.[1]

    Monetary Note:  Just like dependable money, you’ll notice that there is nothing in the definition which requires central parties nor trust.

    One of the best descriptions that I’ve ever heard about bitcoin I believe comes from Max Keiser:

    Bitcoin is [VERY SECURE] email on top of gold.
    [emphasis added by me]

    What Does This Mean?

    The above definitions means that bitcoin gives us the ability to send value over the internet… consistently, instantly, and verifiably.

    Skipping to the punch line:
    It matches the definition of money! [2]

    Bitcoin has the purpose, qualities, attributes, characteristics, functions, and philosophy of good money built into it (Technically, most of these are emergent properties of the bitcoin code, but let’s not quibble…). From a historical point of view:

    Bitcoin is actually the FIRST true
    form of money that we have ever known.

    Taking this a step further, we can ascertain:

    Since money is a psycho-technology,
    the first true money actually had to be invented
    and engineered from the ground up. [3]

    Monetary Note: This is in comparison to gold, which is merely pulled from the ground “as is“.  Consequently, we had to use all of the properties of gold, regardless if they were suitable (much less, optimal) for good money. As an example, “verifiable” is a requirement for dependable money. As talked about in a previous article, here, verifying a gold bar’s or gold coin’s content is not easy. This would be an example of one of gold’s monetary properties which are not desirable (because it is low on the “Verifiability Index” of the “Chrematistics Index“).

    Historical Note: I want to be fair here; I love what gold has done for us for 5,000 years.  If you understand gold’s mechanical, chemical, thermal, and quantum properties, it’s actually a very interesting and unique substance.  The human race has done a good job of applying those properties for the purpose of creating good money.

    Trust… But Verify[4]

    As the reader, you’re probably questioning me, “How can you be so sure of the above working definition and observations of bitcoin?
    Before I answer your question directly, let me assure you:

    You should be questioning me. You should trust nothing that I tell you and you should make every reasonable attempt to verify all of my claims independently.

    Instead of trusting me, DYOR – Do Your Own Research.
    My aim is to give you all of the tools to DYOR!

    But, to answer the question directly, to the best of my ability, I have made personal best efforts to verify my working definition of bitcoin based upon what is demonstrable. The reason why I am able to do my own research is because bitcoin is open source! [5] This means that there is nothing proprietary because the bitcoin code is available to anyone to download and review directly.

    Consequently, everyone can verify the code on their own!

    Any of us can go to GitHub.com, download the code, compile it, and run it on your own. None of us have to depend on anyone else to verify, run, or test the bitcoin code. We don’t need some multi-national corporation or government agency.
    Anyone can look at the code, file-by-file, section-by-section, line-by-line, character-by-character. Nothing is hidden; everything is transparent. [6]

    Because the bitcoin code is open source, the actual code has been audited THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of times by multiple independent experts around the world.

    In fact, some of the most ardent bitcoin proponents actually started with the premise that bitcoin was flawed and that they were going to expose the errors in bitcoin’s code, architecture, and functionality.  Eventually, those very same people became massive bitcoin advocates. [7]

    Going On Tour

    Some of you are exclaiming, “I’m not a coder or a developer! How am I supposed to audit the code??
    Enter the bitcoin “guided tours“. Usually, these guided tours are videos of a presenter or narrator who displays the bitcoin code directly from GitHub and provides explanations for what each file, section, and line of code do. [8]
    Here’s what this means for you, dear reader:

    Anyone can take guided tours of the bitcoin code!

    I’ve actually gone on a few of these bitcoin guided tours. The majority of the presenters do a good job of trying to appeal to a broad audience, to make the technical code something that is comprehensible to most people, technical and non-technical alike. I love that I can follow along section-by-section, line-by-line, character-by-character.
    It is NOT necessary for you to take these guided tours nor audit the code on your own.  I explain all of this so that you know that everything about bitcoin is completely open and transparent.  We don’t have to worry about a special secret technology created by some “wizard” who hides in the shadows.  Bitcoin really is the ultimate in the old Russian expression, “Trust… but verify.[4]

    Bitcoin or Banks?

    I realize that it seems strange that I am emphasizing the auditability so much. But, let’s compare this to any other financial institution or central bank or government treasury on the planet. How many of them provide any sort of reasonable transparency as to how they operate, their true intent, and their inventories of currencies or commodities (i.e. the gold in Fort Knox)?

    In addition to a lack of auditability, let’s compare bitcoin’s speed and availability to most banks’ speed and availability for wire transfers or ACH. As most of you know and have experienced personally, bank wire and ACH transfers:

    • Can’t work on the weekends
    • Only clear during normal business hours
    • Can’t work on holidays
    • Only work about 40 hours / week
      • Out of a possible 168 hours per week, 25% of the time
    • Typically take 3 – 7 days to clear (4,320 – 10,080 minutes)

    In addition to the much slower speeds, banks provide ZERO visibility to you, the customer, as to what is happening on the back-end for the transfer of funds from your bank to another bank. In other words, ZERO auditability.

    Monetary Note: Bitcoin transactions typically take about 10 minutes to clear, which is orders of magnitude faster than banks. Lightning Network transactions, which happen on top of the bitcoin network, clear in about 1 – 5 seconds, even more orders of magnitude faster than the banks.

    Next Up

    In this article, we conducted a high-level look at what bitcoin is and how you can verify how bitcoin works.
    In the next article, here, we’ll dig a little deeper by examining some of the important and demonstrable aspects of bitcoin which have made it so compelling for many around the globe and who consider it to be the first true form of money we have ever seen.

    The Learning Never Stops!

    If you want to continue your journey of learning about all things bitcoin with knowledgeable people who love to be helpful, I highly recommend my bitcoin MeetUp, “Bitcoin, Huntsville, Crypto, & Coffee” which you can find here .  We meet two times every month online to discuss bitcoin and its impact on the world.  You’ll be able to talk directly with others who are also on their personal bitcoin journey and ask them engaging questions.  We’re not selling anything. The only thing that that we ask of you is to come to the table in good faith and be willing to DYOR – Do Your Own Research. We love newbies and the energy they bring!

    Donations

    If you found value in this article please feel free to donate via the following payment methods:

    CashApp:
    $JohnYoung357

    Venmo:
    @John-Young-359

    Bitcoin:
    Bc1qay7mwv6zfepgx8jarw9jhmera660g4f0k4ukv7

    End Notes, References, & Citations

    [1] Cryptography

    Brave search engine summary: “cryptography summary
    Cryptography is the practice of securing information and communications using codes to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and authentication, thereby preventing unauthorized access. It is derived from the Greek word ‘kryptos,’ meaning hidden, and translates to “hidden writing”. The fundamental process involves transforming readable data, known as plaintext, into an unreadable form called ciphertext through encryption, which can only be reversed back to plaintext by authorized parties using a specific key. This process is often represented as C=Ek​(P) and P=Dk​(C), where P is plaintext, C is ciphertext, E is the encryption method, D is the decryption method, and k is the key.
    The primary functions of cryptography include ensuring privacy/confidentiality, authentication, data integrity, non-repudiation, and secure key exchange.
    It is essential for protecting sensitive information in various applications, such as secure online transactions, encrypted messaging, banking, and data storage. Modern cryptography relies on mathematical concepts and algorithms to create secure systems, with key length being a significant factor in the strength of encryption.
    There are several main types of cryptography. Symmetric-key cryptography uses a single secret key for both encryption and decryption, making it efficient for bulk data but requiring a secure method for key distribution.
    Asymmetric-key cryptography, also known as public-key cryptography, uses a pair of keys—a public key for encryption and a private key for decryption—enabling secure key exchange and digital signatures. Hash functions are another critical component, transforming data into a fixed-size message digest that is unique to the input and cannot be reversed, ensuring data integrity. These methods are often combined in modern security protocols, such as TLS for encrypted data transport and encryption-at-rest.
    Historically, cryptography has been used for centuries, from ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs to military and diplomatic communications, and has evolved significantly with the advent of computer technology.
    Today, it is a foundational element of cybersecurity, protecting digital communications across the internet, including web browsing, email, and secure network connections. Despite its importance, cryptography is not a standalone solution; it is one essential step in a broader security strategy, and no system is entirely immune to attacks.

    Cryptography
    Cryptography, or cryptology (from Ancient Greek: κρυπτός, romanized: kryptós “hidden, secret”; and γράφειν graphein, “to write”, or -λογία -logia, “study”, respectively), is the practice and study of techniques for secure communication in the presence of adversarial behavior. More generally, cryptography is about constructing and analyzing protocols that prevent third parties or the public from reading private messages. Modern cryptography exists at the intersection of the disciplines of mathematics, computer science, information security, electrical engineering, digital signal processing, physics, and others. Core concepts related to information security (data confidentiality, data integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation) are also central to cryptography. Practical applications of cryptography include electronic commerce, chip-based payment cards, digital currencies, computer passwords, and military communications.

    [2] Definition of “money
    To see my previous definition of money as well as the pertinent attributes and qualities of dependable money, please reference this article.

    [3] Psycho-technology and money
    The idea that money is actually a type of psycho-technology is a concept that I picked up from Robert Breedlove, host of the “What Is Money” podcast, which I recommend everyone listen to.

    [4] Trust… But Verify

    Trust, But Verify
    Trust, but verify‘ (Russian: доверяй, но проверяй, romanized: doveryay, no proveryay, IPA: [dəvʲɪˈrʲæj no prəvʲɪˈrʲæj]) is a Russian proverb, which rhymes in Russian. The phrase became internationally known in English after Suzanne Massie, a scholar of Russian history, taught it to Ronald Reagan, then president of the United States, who used it on several occasions in the context of nuclear disarmament discussions with the Soviet Union.

    [5] Open source

    Brave search engine summary: “what is open source
    What is Open Source
    Open source refers to a decentralized production model where technology, particularly software, is developed collaboratively with its design and source code publicly accessible to anyone who wishes to use, modify, or share it. The term originated in software development but now embodies a broader set of values known as “the open source way,” emphasizing principles like open exchange, collaborative participation, rapid prototyping, transparency, meritocracy, and community-oriented development.
    Open-source software is defined by its source code being available for inspection, modification, and enhancement by anyone. This contrasts with proprietary or closed-source software, where only the original creators have control over the source code and users must agree to restrictive licenses that limit their ability to view, alter, or redistribute the software. Examples of open-source software include the Linux operating system, Mozilla Firefox, and LibreOffice.
    The core principles of open source include community, transparency, open collaboration, rapid prototyping, and inclusive meritocracy. These principles foster a development environment where anyone can contribute, leading to increased security through widespread code review, greater project resilience as communities can adopt or fork projects, and collaborative problem-solving where improvements benefit everyone. Open-source software is often released under licenses that permit free use, modification, and redistribution, with common types including permissive licenses (like Apache and BSD), copyleft licenses (like the GPL), and public domain licenses.
    While open source software is often free to use, it is distinct from “free software” (a term associated with the free software movement focused on user freedoms) and “freeware” (software available at no cost but with restrictions on modification or redistribution). The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is the standards body that maintains the Open Source Definition, which legally defines the conditions for software to be considered open source, and approves licenses accordingly. Many critical technologies, including the internet infrastructure, cloud computing platforms like OpenStack, and popular programming languages, are built on open-source foundations.

    Open-Source Software
    Open-source software (OSS) is computer software that is released under a license in which the copyright holder grants users the rights to use, study, change, and distribute the software and its source code to anyone and for any purpose. Open-source software may be developed in a collaborative, public manner. Open-source software is a prominent example of open collaboration, meaning any capable user is able to participate online in development, making the number of possible contributors indefinite. The ability to examine the code facilitates public trust in the software.”

    What Is Open Source Software?
    “Open source software is software with source code that anyone can inspect, modify, and enhance. ‘
    Source code‘ is the part of software that most computer users don’t ever see; it’s the code computer programmers can manipulate to change how a piece of software — a ‘program‘ or ‘application‘ — works. Programmers who have access to a computer program’s source code can improve that program by adding features to it or fixing parts that don’t always work correctly.”

    [6] For the non-technical readers
    I am neither a professional coder nor developer but I have done a little development in my professional life in Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) in Excel and Word (to create macros), some SQL and MySQL, as well as some Python. If I, a relative beginner, can garner a basic understanding of the bitcoin code via the guided tours then I think the vast majority of people can do so, too. I encourage anyone to give it an earnest attempt. Even if you don’t understand it the first time around, you can attend my MeetUp, “Bitcoin, Huntsville, Crypto, & Coffee” to ask good questions!

    [7] Andreas Antonopoulos and his e-book “Mastering Bitcoin
    For those who are interested, I recommend checking out Andreas Antonopoulos on YouTube.  He has a great channel there.  In addition, he wrote the definitive book on understanding bitcoin from a non-programming point of view called “Mastering Bitcoin“.  I cannot recommend this book enough.  Since the topic of bitcoin was so important to me, I took my time in reading it because I wanted to digest it fully.  From his book, he answered about a dozen nagging questions that I had about bitcoin.  Not only did he write this amazing book but he made it FREE.  For anyone who is interested in understanding the technical aspects of bitcoin but not have to worry about the code, dig into Mr. Antonopoulus’s book “Mastering Bitcoin” which you can download here.

    [8] Bitcoin guided tours

    Brave search engine summary: “guided tours of the bitcoin code”
    Bitcoin Code Tour
    Several guided tours of the Bitcoin source code are available, offering insights for developers and enthusiasts. One such tour, presented by a lead developer from a UK-based software company, provides a detailed walk through of key components, starting with the chainparams.cpp file in the official Bitcoin GitHub repository. This file defines the initial parameters for the blockchain, including the three distinct networks: the main network, the test network, and the regression test network. The test network is used for safely testing protocol changes without financial risk, while the regression test network allows for rapid block mining, which is useful for development and testing purposes.
    The tour specifically examines two critical parameters within the code: nPowTargetTimespan and nPowTargetSpacing. The nPowTargetTimespan is set to two weeks (14 days), representing the period over which the network adjusts its mining difficulty based on the time it took to mine 2,016 blocks. The nPowTargetSpacing is set to 10 minutes, meaning the network aims to produce one block every 10 minutes, adjusting the mining difficulty to maintain this target despite fluctuations in the network’s hash rate. The guide explains the trade-offs involved in altering these parameters, noting that a shorter block time can increase transaction throughput but also demands more memory from full nodes, while a longer difficulty adjustment period can make the network vulnerable to hash attacks.
    Another resource is a GitHub project titled “
    Bitcoin v0.1 – A Guided Tour,” which aims to create a book that guides users through the original Bitcoin source code by collecting comments and descriptions of its most relevant parts. This project invites developers to contribute by commenting on specific code sections or submitting issues. Additionally, a blog series on the crypto.bi website details the author’s journey of learning the current Bitcoin source code, focusing on modern developments like Dandelion and Segregated Witness, and starting with the present-day code rather than the original 2009 version to avoid confusion. These resources collectively provide a range of entry points and depths for anyone interested in studying the Bitcoin codebase.

    The Bitcoin Source Code: A Guided Tour” (on YouTube)
    This is actually a playlist of several of videos produced by “Dev Oskii (Oscar)“. This is the exact guided tour that I went through. This content creator did a good job of showing the exact code he was referring to as well as providing context for non-technical individuals. If you have some time, try a couple of the videos on your journey to learn more about bitcoin.

  • Bitcoin: The Ultimate Freedom Accelerator, Pt. 3.1 – Who Owns Bitcoin?

    Previously

    In the previous article, here, we discussed reasons for owning and using fiat currencies as well as finished Part 2 of the BitcoinInPeace opening series, “Monetary Revolutions

    Now, let’s take a look at the influential people and leading companies which have taken the bold leap to own bitcoin and have been vocal about their acquisitions.

    Well-Known People Who Own Bitcoin

    Before digging directly into bitcoin, I’d like to present a list of well-known individuals who own bitcoin personally. While this isn’t a reason by itself to own bitcoin, I think that seeing those who are considered leaders in their respective fields as owners of this most pristine asset helps to put it into context. [1]

    While you may or may not recognize some of the names in the list, they have all come to the same reasonable, rational, logical conclusion that bitcoin is for them and their respective companies:

    Institutions Which Own Bitcoin

    While the above list might be impressive, just displaying a list of a few billionaires who own bitcoin isn’t enough. We need to see institutions which have actually put bitcoin onto their balance sheets. These institutions include:

    • Governments & Sovereign Wealth Funds
    • Privately Held Companies
    • Publicly Traded Companies
    • Academic Institutions & Endowment Funds
    • Trading Institutions
    • Retirement Funds
    • Exchange Traded Funds (ETF’s)

    Financial Note: There are also several instances of insurance companies which own bitcoin. I find this to be significant as insurance companies are typically some of the most conservative of investors. I will pull together a list of these insurance companies in a future article.

    Reference Library Note: We will break-out various lists of these institutions, but before doing that, I recommend that everyone take a look at the BitcoinTreasuries website. BitcoinTreasuries has done a spectacular job of documenting, categorizing, and listing those institutions which made the bold move to put bitcoin onto their balance sheets.

    The lists below are not exhaustive; just the top holders. Now, let’s dig into these major categories:

    Governments & Sovereign Wealth Funds (Total: 526,549 BTC) [3]

    • United States of America
    • China
    • United Kingdom
    • Ukraine
    • North Korea

    Privately Held Companies (Total: 294,101 BTC) [4]

    • Block.one
    • Tether
    • Stone Ridge Holdings
    • SpaceX
    • The Tezos Foundation

    Publicly Traded Companies (Total: 976,132 BTC) [5]

    • Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) [2] [6]
    • MARA Holdings
    • XXI
    • Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company
    • Bullish
    • Tesla
    • Galaxy Digital
    • Semler Scientific
    • Metaplanet
    • Riot Platforms
    • Trump Media

    Academic Institutions & Endowment Funds (Total: Undetermined) [7]

    • Harvard
    • Yale
    • MIT
    • Stanford
    • Dartmouth
    • Emory University
    • University of Austin

    Retirement Funds [8]

    • Fairfax County, VA:  Employees’ Retirement System and Police Officers’ Retirement System
    • Houston Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund
    • South Korea’s National Pension Service
      • (3rd largest pension plan in the world)

    Trading Institutions (Total: Undetermined)

    • Coinbase
    • Gemini
    • River

    Exchange Traded Funds (ETF’s) (Total: 1,626,028) [9] [10]

    • iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)
    • Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC)
    • Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC)
    • BitMEX
    • Ark 21Shares Bitcoin (ARKB)

    Finance Note: Some companies / institutions (and many people!) have opted to own bitcoin ETF shares in lieu of owning bitcoin directly. There are several legal, regulatory, and accounting reasons for doing this which work well for these companies. While I will always default to advising any person or company to own bitcoin outright, I think it is completely reasonable to own bitcoin ETF shares instead. The list of institutions which own bitcoin ETF shares is notable and growing quickly.

    How Much Bitcoin Should I Own?

    One question that I am asked often is, “How much bitcoin should I own?
    Of course, I always respond with the slightly humorous and snarky “consultant’s answer” of, “Well, that depends…“. It depends on several factors, such as risk appetite, available funds, expected life changes and events, and understanding of bitcoin.
    The best answer I ever heard came from Lyn Alden when someone asked her the same question. Paraphrasing, her response was, The percentage of bitcoin in your portfolio should be a reflection of your conviction in bitcoin.This is the best response I’ve ever heard and I have consistently used this ever since. Every time I have shared this answer, people find comfort in it because they instantly realize that they can titrate their ownership based upon personal comfort and knowledge. Consequently, they can move their level up or down over time as their circumstances change.
    Typically, I try to avoid giving financial advice, but I happily recommend to people that they follow these four simple steps to dip their toe into the proverbial bitcoin waters:

    • Buy:  Purchase $100 of bitcoin
    • Sit:  Sit on it for six months
    • Learn:  Use the six months to self-educate on bitcoin
    • Evaluate:  After six months of earnest learning, evaluate your comfort level to see if you should sell, hold, or buy

    $100 is just enough to become emotionally invested but not so much as to be considered a major loss to most people. Six months is also long enough to understand what bitcoin is, how it works, and why it is used.  Continue to visit BitcoinInPeace.comOver time, I will post the best resources for you to use on your quest to self-educate.

    Education Note: While you’re learning, I also highly recommend my bitcoin MeetUp, “Bitcoin, Huntsville, Crypto, & Coffee” which you can find here .  In our MeetUp, we meet two times every month online to discuss bitcoin and its impact on the world.  You’ll be able to talk directly with others who are also on their personal bitcoin journey and ask engaging questions.  We love newbies!

    Personal Finance Note: On a final note, there is an interesting article which was published about three years ago:
    BlackRock Study Reveals: Optimal Bitcoin Allocation In Portfolio Is 84.9%” and here.

    OK, here is the one piece of financial advice that I will give:  DO NOT make your portfolio 85% bitcoin!
    That said, maybe consider making bitcoin 0.85% ( ~1%) of your portfolio…

    Next Steps

    Over the next few articles, we’ll get into the one question that is on everyone’s mind, “What is bitcoin?”  We’ll take a look at bitcoin from a qualitative point of view and also look at the demonstrable attributes, properties, and applications of bitcoin.

    Donations

    If you found value in this article please feel free to donate via the following payment methods:

    CashApp: $JohnYoung357

    Venmo: @John-Young-359

    Bitcoin: Bc1qay7mwv6zfepgx8jarw9jhmera660g4f0k4ukv7

    End Notes, References, & Citations

    [1] Prominent bitcoin owners who are not directly involved with bitcoin
    I tried to focus on individuals who are not directly involved with bitcoin as their core business.  Instead, I wanted to bring to light those who felt that bitcoin was so important that they chose to acquire it to be a part of the new monetary system.  The two exceptions to this are Michael Saylor (of Strategy) and Jack Dorsey (of Block).  Strategy (previously “MicroStrategy”) is considered to be a “bitcoin treasury company” or “BTC”.  Block is deep in the bitcoin realm as a company which is actively working on bitcoin payment solutions (such as the “Lightning Network”).

    [2] The special case of Strategy (Symbol: MSTR)
    There is one special case that I’d like to focus on; as of the time of writing, 08/16/2025, Strategy (MSTR) owns ~600,000 bitcoin (~$72B).  While that is an extreme case, he and the MSTR Board of Directors believe in bitcoin so much that they are willing to put it on the company’s balance sheet by getting rid of their fiat currency (USD) to own bitcoin.

    [3] Governments & Sovereign Wealth funds which hold bitcoin here

    [4] Privately held companies which hold bitcoin here

    [5] Publicly traded companies which hold bitcoin here

    [6] In MSTR’s case, they have actually created a portfolio of financial products to fulfill their bitcoin acquisition strategy (Which Michael Saylor called the “Triple Maxi“).  I do not recommend for that course of action (nor do I recommend against it).  If you’re interested in learning more about Mr. Saylor’s formula for using financial products to acquire more bitcoin then I recommend this video, “Michael Saylor Bitcoin 2024 Keynote Speech” which he gave at the 2024 Nashville Bitcoin Conference (which I saw while attending the conference).

    [7] Academic Institutions & Endowment Funds which hold bitcoin

    [8] Retirement Funds which hold bitcoin

    • Fairfax County Pension documented here and here
    • Houston Firefighters Retirement Fund documented here and here
    • South Korea National Pension Service documented here and here

    [9] Exchange Traded Funds (ETF’s) which hold bitcoin for clients here

    [10] Notes on ETF’s
    Exchange traded funds (ETF’s) hold the underlying asset for shareholders. Technically, these assets are considered not to be “on the balance sheets” of the companies which created and manage the ETF’s. Instead, the shares of the ETF’s are on the balance sheets of the customers who own the ETF stocks. That said, I still think it is important to show these ETF’s because the underlying bitcoin (1,626,028 BTC) are spoken for by the owners of the the ETF shares (retail and institutional alike). That is significant interest in this nascent asset.

  • Monetary Revolutions, Pt. 2.6 – Why Use Fiat?

    Previously

    In the previous article, here, we made the distinction between hard money and soft money, dependable money and fiat currency. We also took a cursory look at the means by which governments use undependable money as a means of subverting the values of the citizenry.
    Now, let’s take an objective look at why anyone would advocate for the use of bad money despite its obvious ill effects. As we go through some of the advantages of fiat, we will often refer to a previous post, “Monetary Revolutions, Pt 2.4: What Is Money?“. Specifically, we will refer to the attributes, characteristics, and functions of good money and fiat currencies.

    Who Advocates For Inferior Money?

    There are some who would argue that there are real advantages to using currencies, soft money, and that those advantages outstrip any of their disadvantages. Unfortunately, those who actively advocate for fiat currencies come in two distinct varieties:

    • Those who benefit from it financially and / or politically
    • Those who have not actually studied what the differences are between dependable money and soft money

    Over the course of many future articles, we will go into deeper dives as to why these two groups exist and the effects of both of them.

    What Are The Outcomes Of Soft Money?

    Before diving into the advantages of fiat currencies, let’s do a quick review on the emergent functions of any form of money

    1. Storehouse of Value
    2. Medium of Exchange
    3. Unit of Account

    In order for any kind of money truly to be useful it must meet these two requirements: 1) meet the attributes and characteristics of good money and 2) be readily available to the people voluntarily.

    As it stands now, the only reason why people use fiat currencies is because their respective governments order them to do so (hence the Latin term “fiat” which translates to “authority“, “decree“, or “order“) and because they think there are no viable alternatives.  Taken a step further, their respective governments order the citizenry to use inferior forms of money with accompanying coercion and punishments for non-compliance.

    As we have consistently seen throughout this opening series, all fiat currencies fail the most important function of money – store of value. In economic terms, we would say that soft money is not “salable over time“.  I think we would agree that currencies do not hold their value over time.  As an apt analogy, soft money is “an iceberg floating in warm Caribbean waters” (credit to Michael Saylor for the metaphor).

    What Are The Advantages Of Fiat?

    Due to many inherent disadvantage of using gold as money, soft money has many huge advantages over more traditional payment methods (i.e. gold or silver). In fact, most contemporary soft monies are adequate as a medium of exchange and very good as a unit of account. People and businesses can move U.S. dollars relatively quickly across vast distances. These two functions combined create a good deal of convenience for the vast majority of people to conduct business. We call this “salable over space“. [1]

    Let’s dig into those advantages a little.

    There are actually a few practical advantages of fiat for both governments and the citizenry. All of these advantages come from inertia of previously existing systems which are a veritable rat’s nest of mismatched systems. [2]

    That said, as it stands right now, fiat currencies are the fastest means by which we can transmit value over space and have the transaction settled by both parties.  There are hundreds of payment networks and systems globally which can facilitate the movement of payments around the globe.  Behind those payment networks are entire currency exchanges which exist in order to trade one country’s currency for another’s (i.e. selling Euro’s and buying Chinese Renminbi at some specific price).

    These currency trades offset the net liabilities that one nation incurs due to the previously mentioned payments.  One of the largest currency exchange systems is known as “FOREX” (short for “Foreign Exchange”). At each interface of payments systems and currency exchanges, there are teams of people who are responsible for ensuring that currencies flow with minimal errors. [3] [4] [5]

    All of this means that soft money has a decent (but not great) ability to fulfill the monetary function of medium of exchange. Said another way, fiat money is able to retain its value over vast differences because it doesn’t require prohibitive costs to do so.

    All prices of goods and services globally are priced in some sort of fiat currency. Because of this, fiat currencies have definitely fulfilled the economic function of unit of account quite well. Even when products are not priced in a particular currency, making the conversion is not particularly cumbersome if one is willing to work through existing payment networks or banking systems.

    The above mentioned payment networks and currency exchanges have evolved over decades to address deficiencies which were realized over time. In effect, this is a long string of patches and workarounds (a veritable “charlie foxtrot“) which few people in the world truly understand and even fewer could explain from a technical point of view.

    Overall, even with all their patchwork quilt of manual processes, antiquated computer systems, and limited technicians, fiat currencies do a fine job of moving the modern global economy.

    For a price…

    State Controlled Currency Is Good For… The State

    In previous centuries, whenever free markets had the (uncoerced) choice of choosing a form of money that best represented their values, they always used the hardest money that was readily available to them (typically gold and / or silver). Those governments which implemented and maintained a hard money standard were naturally constrained. Thus, the only reason for a state to deviate from this natural constraint is for the express purpose of power acquisition.

    Consequently, when we talk about “advantages” of using a fiat currency, considering that governments use them as a ubiquitous means of extracting value out of your wallet (and your savings and checking accounts), the true advantage of soft money lies solely with… the state (and their cohorts).

    Corrupted Money = Corrupted Values

    A state controlled money always corrupts the money supply, its usage, and, consequently, perverts a population’s values and philosophy. It warps that society’s incentives and bends it towards the state’s preferences and mandates. Of course, that’s the point. As mentioned earlier in this series, it is about one set of humans (government) telling another set of humans (the citizenry) how they should be living their lives.

    I realize that it sounds nefarious to think that our own governments are deliberately sabotaging us by using these corrupted monetary systems. At this point, it is difficult to say if the end results were deliberate and invoked or merely evolved emergent properties. Either way, the results are the same.

    This leads to a question that has plagued mankind since the beginning of civilization – How do we foster a civilizing force while also promoting individual liberty by preserving the rights of all?

    What Enables Bad Government?

    A brief review from a previous article, Part 2.4 – “What Is Money?”, let’s revisit my working definition of fiat currency:

    Fiat Currency – A credit-based system which acts as a proxy of money yet is incapable of exhibiting all of the qualities, attributes, characteristics, and functions of good money.

    Note:  Requires a central party and trust.

    Since, soft money requires a central party and trust by the citizenry to manage it (and the state regulates it), the people have (unintentionally) offloaded their personal responsibilities for finding dependable money to the state entirely.

    If we combine this with the fact that the government can ONLY fund their extra-Constitutional (unethical) activities via currencies and easy debt, then it’s easy to see how any government would use that as a prime opportunity to leverage their position of power for self-serving purposes.

    Getting into some specifics, these are the ways by which their self-serving corruption manifests:

    • Massive law enforcement
    • Global military force
    • Leviathan of bureaucracy
    • Legions of regulatory agencies
    • Governmental “programs”
    • Unlimited entitlements
    • The “three letter agencies
    • Confiscatory and punitive taxes [6]

    Overall, I think that most reasonable people would not have a problem with the above list if they knew that they were extremely limited in size, scope, and activity. But, as most of us have observed, either through history or firsthand experience, that is never the case. Every single agency, department, law, regulation, and program creeps far beyond its initial intent. And, every power that the state takes necessarily comes at the expense of the people’s rights.

    Unfortunately, as it stands now, there are simply too many virtual parasites on the system to reverse course voluntarily. These parasites include those inside of government who seek power and wealth as well as those outside of government who are happy to ride the veritable gravy train of state power. Too many people have learned how to “feed at the public trough“.

    My study, usage, and promotion of bitcoin has been fueled by my wariness of large and unlimited government. I think all of you can, in principle, agree with my suspicion of unlimited powers of the state. Ultimately, if we boil down the vast majority of the problems that we face in the world we can usually trace them to unrestrained and unlimited government.

    Fiat currencies always become the primary means by which government is able to exert so much control over its citizens. Don’t believe me?  Try this thought experiment:

    • Remove governments’ ability to print more currency out of thin air
    • Remove their ability to sell their debts (bonds) on the open market
    • Limit funding of governments’ operations entirely to tax revenues (and not debt)

    I am fairly certain that no one can point to a single authoritarian or tyrannical government which is able to exert so much control without monetary inflation and foisting of its debts onto the public.

    What If…?

    Let’s take a moment to consider a set of possibilities pertaining to the nature of the relationship between government and the governed:

    • What if we had a passive method of containing the leviathan of government without any active measures needed?
    • What if government had to live within its means and budget just like you and me?
    • What if government had to create a stack-ranked set of spending priorities just as everyone else does?
    • What if government had no means of placing its goals above citizens’ values?
    • What if government did not have the means of being self-serving?
    • What if, for every governmental program it wanted to enact, it had to deactivate another?
    • What if, for every dollar spent in one location, it had to save in another?
    • What if the state had to compete for resources the same as everyone else?
    • What if governments had to follow their two prime directives – defend individual liberties and defend contracts?
    • What if the state were on equal footing as the people?
    • What if government were merely a tool for serving the people and not a tool for power, politicking, and scheming?
    • What if we had a way of completely neutering the state?
    • What if the state were disincentivized to engage in interference of our lives?
    • What if the state had to serve the citizenry and not the other way around?

    Going Forward

    Going forward, in future posts, I will continue to make the case that governments are inherently corrupted and incapable of self-regulation since they don’t actually exist and are, instead, actually comprised solely of fallible people (like you and me). Consequently, the best that we can (and ought to) do is to limit the deleterious effects of the state on the citizenry.
    I believe the absolute optimal means of doing just that is to use a hard money standard which naturally and passively curtails all activities of the state. Thus, even if the state becomes corrupted, it is severely limited in its ability to spread that corruption because it simply doesn’t have the funds to spread its nefarious or ill-conceived goals.

    Next Steps

    Part 2 of this opening series, “Monetary Revolutions” comes to a close. We now move on to the meat of this opening series and the reason why we’re all here – “Part 3: Bitcoin, The Ultimate Freedom Accelerator“. In Part 3, starting here, we’ll examine what bitcoin is, its demonstrable characteristics and attributes, those of note who own bitcoin, and why it’s hard money.

    Donations

    If you found value in this article please feel free to donate via the following payment methods:

    CashApp: $JohnYoung357

    Venmo: @John-Young-359

    Bitcoin: Bc1qay7mwv6zfepgx8jarw9jhmera660g4f0k4ukv7

    End Notes, References, & Citations

    [1] Designing multiple fiat systems from the ground up

    No one would ever design a system like this from the ground up. In other words, all fiat systems are far from optimal. In fact, they are a downright mess. If you are ever interested in experiencing just how poorly our financial systems are designed and operated, try sending a bank wire transfer to another country. You will encounter intrusive paperwork, questions from a banker, an elongated process, and limited hours within the week where you can actually send and receive these wire transfers.
    Here is an example of how difficult and cumbersome the bank wire process is: try sending $1,000 from the U.S. to a recipient in Japan via bank wire. Then, at the very same time, send $1,000 in physical bills to the same recipient via FedEx International Priority Mail. Your physical $1,000 will arrive before the bank wire is available, and the recipient will never even need to leave the house (versus going to their bank).

    [2] Systems and processes necessary to send a bank wire

    In order to conduct a domestic bank wire transfer, three major phases must be executed:

    • Setup and execution of the wire transfer from the sending bank
    • Inter-bank transfer
    • Acknowledgement and receipt by the receiving bank

    Regardless of the presumed image of computer systems executing each phase with lightning speed and automation, each of the above phases require a bevy of manual steps and human cross-checks. It’s even worse for international wires.

    [3] How much currency flows through the FOREX systems?

    Monica.AI query (using ChatGPT-4o): “What is the total annual trade volume of currencies in the FOREX markets (valued in USD)?

    Monica.AI response:

    As of my last knowledge update in June 2023, the total daily trading volume in the Forex (foreign exchange) market is estimated to be around $6 trillion. This figure can vary, but it is widely accepted as a general benchmark.

    To calculate the total annual trade volume, you can use the following formula:

    • Annual Trade Volume=Daily Trade Volume×Number of Trading DaysAnnual Trade Volume=Daily Trade Volume×Number of Trading Days
    • Assuming there are about 252 trading days in a year (accounting for weekends and holidays), the calculation would be:
    • Annual Trade Volume=6 trillion USD×252≈1.512 quadrillion USDAnnual Trade Volume=6 trillion USD×252≈1.512 quadrillion USD

    Summary:

    • Estimated Daily Trade Volume: $6 trillion
    • Estimated Annual Trade Volume: Approximately $1.512 quadrillion USD

    For the most current figures, I recommend checking reputable financial news sources or Forex market reports, as these numbers can fluctuate with market conditions. If you need real-time data, I can assist with a web search for the latest information.

    [4] Gold’s saleability over space

    This is in comparison to gold, which often lost its value over large distances due to the inconvenience and costs associated with moving and paying debts with it. These costs might include security personnel to keep it from being stolen, transportation, and verification.

    [5] Popular retail payment apps

    There are some common retail payment systems which are very fast at clearing transactions, such as Venmo, CashApp, and Zelle. As long as the currency stays within those virtual ecologies, then transactions can be cleared in less than one second. The real trick, though, is moving currency out of those ecologies into another system, such as a bank, requires more effort and time and regulatory compliance (such as “anti-money laundering, know-your-customer“, “AML KYC”)

    [6] Confiscatory and punitive taxes

    For reference, USDebtClock has high-level numbers which show the amount of tax revenues that the federal and state governments collect.

  • Monetary Revolutions, Pt. 2.5 – Money Vs. Currency

    Previously

    In the previous article, here, we went into depth and detail to define “money”. In addition, we made good faith efforts to measure the monetary attributes and characteristics of a commodity to derive the Chrematistics Index and its underlying indices (all of which I developed and coined).

    Now, equipped with a working definition of money, let’s compare the terms “money” and “currency” and see what the major differences are.

    Nomenclature

    Before diving deep, let’s provide some nomenclature. In everyday parlance, we use “money” and “currency” synonymously. In normal usage, this is not a problem. But, for the sake of a deeper philosophical discussion, let’s separate the two:

    • Money: hard money, good money, sound money, dependable money
    • Currency: fiat money, credit-based exchange, loose money, soft money, bad money, undependable money

    With regards to the term “fiat”, this comes from Latin which means “dictate, order, or decree“. In the context of fiat currencies, governments are mandating or dictating (by way of coercion or outright force) that their people must use their undependable money rather than some superior form of money that the market would naturally prefer and gravitate towards.

    What Separates Hard Money From Soft Money?

    In the previous article, we looked at the nine attributes and characteristics of money. With the obvious proviso that while there is no particular object or commodity which can fulfill all nine attributes perfectly, there have been been some commodities throughout history which have had the nine monetary characteristics to varying degrees. We would call these “hard money”. Common examples include (but are not limited to) gold and silver.

    Ultimately, what supplants hard money with soft money (fiat currency) is when one small set of people (in government) mandates to another larger set of people (the citizenry) that they must use an inferior form of money. This mandate must always be accompanied by coercion, force, and threats of force. [1]

    If I were pressed to point out the monetary attributes which ultimately separate hard money and fiat currency, the two most important attributes are verifiable and opportunity costed. We discussed those two attributes in the previous article, here. Ultimately, what makes these who properties so important is that reflect a money’s tie to reality. Let’s dig a little deeper into these two monetary characteristics to understand why they are so crucial for separating dependable money from soft money.

    Verifiable

    In the context of hard versus soft money, verifiable means the reasonable and cost-effective ability for any party to assure that the object in question contains the claimed contents.

    One example is verifying a bar of gold or gold coin. Gold cannot realistically and reasonably be counterfeited at the sub-atomic level by adding or removing protons to the nucleus of some atom (such as iridium or mercury). But there are are numerous instances of bad actors embedding cheaper materials (i.e. using tungsten rods) in gold bars in order to make the bar weigh more for lower cost. While this has happened, it requires considerable effort and can be caught with reasonable counter-measures (i.e. melting down the gold bar). We briefly touched on the some ways that gold coins and gold bars can be tested objectively here.

    For the vast majority of people, verifying gold bars or coins is neither easy, feasible, nor cost effective. The average individual must depend on centralized institutions to go through the verification process and the results must be trusted. Based upon this, one could argue that gold does not meet the criteria for verifiable.

    As for physical dollars, these can be reasonably verified with built-in anti-counterfeiting measures, U.S. dollar bills can be forged. In fact, there are entire illicit industries (and some countries) devoted to that very practice. Thus, these anti-counterfeiting measures are often defeated. In some small measure, this ruins the verifiability of physical dollar bills. As individuals (and companies), we must trust that the government has built-in excellent and cost efficient anti-forging measures into physical dollars. They have not.

    On the other end of the verifiability spectrum, electronic dollars cannot be reasonably verified. As common people, we must trust that our financial institutions have created and custodied these electronic dollars. Based upon the criteria for money in the previous article, here, true money does not require trust nor central parties. Consequently, both physical and electronic dollars fail the test for good money.

    In a later article in this opening series, we’ll take a closer look at bitcoin to examine if it passes or fails the test for good money.

    Opportunity Costed

    In the previous article, here, we took a high-level look at the economic concept of opportunity cost and its value as one of the nine characteristics of dependable money. In summary, the opportunity cost of dependable money should be high. In fact, the opportunity cost should be so high that anyone who is considering creating new money must make a difficult decision as to whether they should mint money or use their time, efforts, and capital for other endeavors, such as building cars, opening a restaurant, buying a bond, or even working for someone else.

    For example, the cost to produce a physical dollar bill is about 7.5 cents. For a $1 bill, this would be 7.5% of the face value. For a $100 bill, this would translate to 0.075% of the face value. The opportunity cost of creating a dollar bill is minuscule especially in comparison to its market value. Physical dollars (and all fiat currencies) do not meet the requirement for opportunity costs.

    With regards to electronic dollars (in the M1 and M2 money supplies), the electronic costs (on a per unit basis) for creation and maintenance are essentially zero. In economic terms, we would say that the marginal cost of production is approaching zero. We looked at some of the estimated costs of production of physical and electronic dollars in the previous article here. Electronic fiat currencies are extremely low on the Opportunity Cost monetary attribute spectrum.

    As for gold, the direct costs of digging up gold, purifying it, and forming it into a shape that is recognizable is high in comparison to its market cost. Along with the direct costs, a vendor has to make the decision every day to choose how they direct their finances, capital equipment, and operations (i.e. a gold production, run a supermarket, or move into finance) with corresponding opportunity costs costs. We looked at the costs of producing a troy ounce of gold in the previous article here. Based upon this, gold (and silver) meet the opportunity cost criteria quite well. [2]

    With regards to bitcoin, just like with verifiable, we’ll test if bitcoin meets the criteria for good money in a later article in this opening series.

    Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC’s)

    There is one specialized case of currencies called “central bank digital currencies” (“CBDC’s“). We very briefly touched upon CBDC’s in a past article, here and here. In short, if implemented, CBDC’s would be one of the ultimate tools in the state’s toolbox of controlling the populace. [3] This control would come in three forms:

    • Trade Control: Controlling when, where, and how much certain goods and services which can and cannot be purchased. Possible controls might include: restrictions on gasoline purchases, meat consumption, airline travel, etc.
    • Surveillance: Giving the state the ability to monitor directly what are buying and selling, providing a feedback mechanism for the trade control above. For example, doing business with someone who is considered “socially undesirable“, monitoring if one group of people is consuming “too many resources” or engaging in “non-value added activities“.
    • Social Engineering: With the above two tools of trade control and surveillance, governments have the ability to “fine tune” their populations for the purpose of surordinating the will and values of the citizenry to those in government. Examples might include: putting “expiration dates” on currency that are people’s bank accounts to encourage them to spend it faster for the purpose of increasing national GDP figures or “encouraging” a population to buy gov’t bonds in order to soak up the state’s debt.

    If you think things are bad now, think of how much the state can control your lives when they can control your “money” and your ability to interact in the 32 market sectors (which we identified in a previous article, here). This will be orders of magnitude worse than 2020 – 2024 (and not getting the “poke“).

    Needless to say, there are many in the world who are adamantly opposed to CBDC’s for the very fact that they give governments the primary means of being so authoritarian with the people, thus completely curtailing their individual liberties.

    Civilizing Force

    A major consequence of governments having control over your financial resources (your currency) is that they can supplant your values with their values. In this case, your ability to plan and save for the future has been completely hampered. You might have the desire to delay any immediate gratification that you would get from spending your money in the short term and, instead, set that money aside for investing in real estate or stocks or even your own company. In economics, we call spending money now for immediate gratification “high time preference” and saving money for investing in the future “low time preference“. [4]

    With governments fiddling with your time preference, it has placed its values and philosophies above your own. As a consequence, the course of entire countries are changed and corrupted. A society’s ability to plan for the future, to plant the seeds of infrastructure, technology, and health are stymied. Instead, they focus on consumption and entertainment, like “bread and circuses“. [5] This is why fiat currency is a de-civilizing force and hard money is a civilizing force; because, they change time horizons, a.k.a. time preferences.

    Next Steps

    This article was kept short since the previous article was a bit, ahem, extended…

    In the next article, here, we’ll examine reasons why the citizenry and the state would want to use fiat currencies despite their obvious shortcomings and deleterious effects.

    Donations

    If you found value in this article please feel free to donate via the following payment methods:

    CashApp: $JohnYoung357

    Venmo: @John-Young-359

    Bitcoin: Bc1q6t5yyx28e3pzag7srxe8t9dpx39ldsytn3twux

    End Notes, References, & Citations

    [1] Rai stones from Yap Island and glass beads in Africa

    There have been notable exceptions to this where the monetary systems of some region were severely disrupted not because of the mandate of state but superior technology actually devalued the then-current form of money.

    • Rai stones of Yap island
    • Glass beads in Africa

    History Note: Famous Austrian school economist, Saifedean Ammous, covers the Rai stones and glass beads of Africa in his book “The Bitcoin Standard” on pages 9, 11 – 13, and 174.

    [2] Gold from nuclear fusion

    An interesting video, here, (“3 Tons of Gold Per Year from Nuclear Fusion?“) from Sabine Hossenfelder’s YouTube channel, here, highlights interesting speculation that gold could be a possible product of a certain type of man-made nuclear fusion. If this ever were to materialize, gold would flood the market, thus driving down its price and severely affecting its ability to be dependable money.

    [3] De-facto CBDC’s

    One could argue that we already have de facto CBDC systems in most countries. If a federal or national government wishes to inhibit or even outright confiscate a person’s or company’s currency then they merely need to mandate this to happen via law enforcement (i.e. the Department Of Justice), regulatory agencies (i.e. the Securities & Exchange Commission), or central banks (i.e. the Federal Reserve). The difference between these agencies confiscating your dollars and a CBDC is that they would require coordinated effort to make it happen.

    With a pure CBDC, though, direct control of your currency would happen literally with the stroke of a few keyboard clicks by some unelected bureaucrat or administrator (in a central bank). They can control where, when, on what, and how you spend your money. And, they can still take it from you if you aren’t spending it quickly enough. This completely hamstrings your ability to engage in saving for the purpose of capital investing.

    [4] high time preference versus low time preference

    Famous Austrian school economist, Saifedean Ammous, covers the topic of time preference in his book “The Bitcoin Standard” on pages 7, 74 – 80, 143 as well as his book “The Fiat Standard” (covered in many pages). For those who want to a well thought out and documented book on why bitcoin is so important, please read both of Mr. Ammous’s books. He makes the case for bitcoin superbly.

  • Monetary Revolutions, Pt. 2.4 – What Is Money?

    What Is Money?

    Previously

    In the previous article, here, we briefly examined the means and the history of governments corrupting their monetary systems which invariably corrupted the societies and cultures they are charged with defending.

    Now, let’s make reasonable attempts to define this rather ethereal concept we call “money” by conducting a detailed examination of its purpose, qualities, attributes, characteristics, functions, and underlying philosophy.

    A History Of Defining Money

    For millennia, mankind has attempted to craft a solid definition of money.  At first blush, this should be a fairly straightforward endeavor (especially considering we use it every day). Unfortunately, such is not the case…

    Circa 2,500 years ago, the ancient Greek philosopher, Aristotle, made good attempts at defining money.  He identified four attributes of good money – durable, portable, divisible, and rare (which he called “intrinsically valuable“).  While I am of the opinion that this initial list is inadequate, I think he took the most important step by starting the conversation. [1]

    Author’s Note: Speaking of defining money, there is even a show called the “What Is Money” podcast, hosted by Robert Breedlove. [2] I recommend that anyone who has even a cursory interest in the concept of money listen to it.  By conducting long-form interviews with a broad range of guests, Mr. Breedlove has taken the deepest dive into the topic of defining money that I have ever seen.  Much like eastern philosophy attempting to define “the Tao“, (or “the Dao” or “the Way“), [3] something which should be so straightforward to define, money, has been one of the most elusive of topics ever tackled.  I give him credit for being so persistent and engaging in good faith efforts.  It is a worthy goal.

    A Working Definition Of Money

    In an attempt to provide a starting point for the conversation, I developed a working definition of “money”. It was my attempt at providing the correct and comprehensive (and seemingly at-odds) mix of inclusion, abstraction, and specificity.

    My working definition of money:

    Money is an abstraction, a model, implemented as a psychotechnology, whose purpose is the fulfillment of the economic coincidence of wants (across both space and time) via an intermediating asset, that can be implemented via any tangible or intangible thing provided that thing has the following nine attributes and characteristics of acceptable, divisible, fungible, portable, reliable, scarce, controllable, opportunity costed, and verifiable, which results in the emergent functions (in order) of storehouse of value, medium of exchange, and unit of account, and ultimately serves the metaphysical, financial, temporal, dimensional, and linguistic function of universal translator.

    OK, that’s a mouthful and a lot to chew on… So, let’s break this definition into digestible sections.

    Author’s Note:  This (rather wordy) working definition of money was developed by me solely.  Any deficiencies and inaccuracies are entire my own and should not be attributed to anyone else. Anything that I got right should be attributed to the long list of wonderful people who have positively influenced my thinking on the matter.

    Implementation

    Money is an abstraction, a model,
    implemented as a psychotechnology,…

    Expansion: 

    For millennia, physical gold (and silver) had been the primary composition of money for many governments.  But, not just any gold could been used; it had to have certain characteristics such as purity (“fineness“), weight, dimensions, emblems (pictograms), etc.  Thus, when a gold coin had all of these attributes, it was traditionally called “money”.
    What came along with the label of money was a way for us to think of this physical token (coin).  That way of thinking falls under the heading of psychotechnology (which we covered here). [4]
    Individuals who used gold coins each had subjective value that they placed on these tokens.  Those who bought physical goods and services and paid for them with gold placed more subjective value on the purchased items than the gold coins they used to pay for them.  On the other side of the trade, the ones who sold those physical goods and services for gold coins, placed more subjective value on the money as an intermediating asset than the items which they sold.  Counterintuitively, this truly is a “win-win” scenario because each side had an increase in perceived value because they voluntarily were able to trade one thing of lesser subjective value for another thing of greater subjective value.

    Thus, the gold coins were used as psychotechnology, a model or mental framework, because of the way that they were able to facilitate a trade between two people.  In both cases, the gold was a means of transferring subjective value between parties.

    Monetary Note: I could have two gold objects (one gold coin and one gold nugget), each containing exactly one troy ounce of gold. The difference between the two is that the gold coin has acceptable and desired attributes (such as purity and geometry or specific dimensions) while the gold nugget has poorly defined or unknown characteristics (composition and no apparent geometry). In a gold standard society, only the gold coin would be accepted as money while the gold nugget would not be accepted due to its unknown or undefined characteristics. In each case, they contain the exact same amount of gold yet only one would be considered money. Ultimately, what causes the gold coin to be considered money is not the physical material but that its form meets certain characteristics of the definition of money, which is a type of psychotechnology.

    Purpose

    …whose purpose is the fulfillment of the economic coincidence of wants (across both space and time) via an intermediating asset and can be implemented via any tangible or intangible thing…

    Expansion: 

    Before the ubiquitous utilization of money, barter (trading) was the primary means of transferring value amongst people and parties.  Unfortunately, without money, this caused a whole host of challenges that are inherent with barter.
    Let’s pretend that you have a truck that you want to sell and I have eggs that I want to sell. Let’s also say that I want to purchase your truck. In this case, the only means that I have for purchasing your truck is with the eggs that I have. I might literally need to provide tens of thousands of eggs in order to bring enough value to the table to purchase your truck.
    Unfortunately for both of us, I might not have the means to deliver that many eggs and you might not have the ability to store those eggs for the long term before you can exchange them for something else of value before they spoil. We could extend this scenario to almost any example of barter we can think of – shoes for paper, cows for flowers, books for concrete.

    Ultimately, we are trying to create a condition called “coincidence of wants“, where we each have something that the other person wants and are willing to come to some agreement of qualities and quantities for exchanging those things.

    And, the above hypothetical example only addresses physical products. What about services? How does one transfer services from person to person to person in a barter economy?

    Hence an “intermediating” asset was developed in order to facilitate the economic coincidence of wants – money.

    This intermediating asset allowed us the ability to store (in both space and time) the subjective value of just about anything provided both parties came to a voluntary and mutually beneficial agreement. Ultimately, this intermediating asset became a means to facilitate economic transactions and exchanges of both physical goods and services. This intermediating asset should not spoil (for transportation over time) and should be relatively portable (for transportation over space).

    Attributes & Characteristics

    …provided that thing has the following nine attributes and characteristics of acceptable, divisible, fungible, portable, reliable, scarce, controllable, opportunity costed, and verifiable…

    Expansion: 

    Any list of acceptable attributes and characteristics of money that I’ve seen in the past has always been inadequate and did not stand up to scrutiny.  After much searching, I had to develop my own list that addressed those inadequacies. While the above list of attributes and characteristics has drawn from others throughout history, I believe that this is the only one of its kind which brings all of them together. That said, I could be wrong…

    These characteristics and properties are not binary (“all or nothing“).  Instead there is a range of values (either objective or subjective) for each of them.  Thus, just because something that we consider to be money doesn’t have 100% of all of these attributes and qualities doesn’t mean that people don’t find great value in using it as money.  And, that is the crucial lesson here – what the market considers to be dependable money doesn’t need to possess an all-or-nothing component. Instead, a range of acceptable properties can exist.

    The most important lesson is this – what people value as money isn’t the thing itself (i.e. gold, silver, seashells, cigarettes, etc.). Instead, what they value the most are the qualities and characteristics of the thing.

    Let’s go through the above list of nine attributes. Along with each attribute, I provide end notes on various indices, objective measures of each attribute as a measure of ability to be dependable money. If you have any curiosity, I recommend going through the end notes to see what my recommendations are for each monetary attribute.

    Monetary Note: The list and descriptions of attributes and characteristics that I have identified below is of my construction.  Any errors, fallacies, and missteps are entirely my own and a good-faith effort to provide a comprehensive and gapless set of attributes that can reasonably be applied to any commodity which is used as dependable money.

    Monetary Note: These indices are entirely my creation and my best efforts at providing concreteness and context for the reader. As clarified before, any missteps or mistakes are entirely my fault and should not be attributed at anyone else.

    Acceptable:

    A commodity which is ubiquitously used (accepted) within a free market as the intermediating asset for trading (a “medium of exchange“). If the majority of people use that money for transactions then it is highly acceptable (i.e. U.S. dollars). If few people use it then is is not acceptable. Ironically, in today’s society, gold would actually have very low acceptability even though it used to be highly acceptable in previous centuries.
    Previously, gold and silver did a good job as materials to constitute money.  In fact, entire empires have been built on the fact that gold and silver coins from these empires were accepted far and wide beyond the borders of those empires.  We saw examples of these empires and the results of their hard money systems in a previous article which you can read here.

    Historical Note: Historically speaking, on small regional scales, other commodities have been used as acceptable money, such as seashells, cigarettes, and carved stones.

    Index Note:  See “Acceptability Index” in the End Notes, References, & Citations [5]

    Divisible:

    The ability for an individual unit of money to be subdivided into smaller and well-defined parts without undue burden or cost and without losing disproportionate value. In the case of dependable money, this normally means having smaller units, such as a $1 bill which can be “broken” into small units such as quarters, dimes, nickels, and / or pennies.
    In the case of “divisibility”, the smaller the units that a money can be subdivided into then the greater its divisibility. As an example, the ability to divide a $1 bill into 100 smaller units (pennies) has reasonable divisibility.

    Monetary Notes: Technically, a $100 bill cannot be subdivided into two $50 bills. In fact, “subdividing” (tearing or cutting) a $100 bill would actually destroy the monetary value instantly. Instead, that $100 bill must be exchanged in order to divide it in half without any degradation of value. The same could be said for all physical dollars.
    Continuing this line of thinking, one could physically subdivide one troy ounce of gold into two one-half ounce pieces by physically breaking or cutting it in half, but that would come with a whole host of issues. Breaking that coin into two exact halves would be very difficult, and getting anyone to accept the two halves (with their obvious jagged edges) would be a challenge. Instead, that one troy ounce gold piece would have to be melted down and recast and stamped into two smaller gold coins. That would require effort and definitely be difficult and costly for the holder. Alternatively, one could find someone else who would be willing to exchange a one troy ounce gold coin for two half ounce gold coins.
    For the record, one bitcoin can be subdivided perfectly into 100,000,000 parts without any damage or loss of value.

    Index Note:  See the “Divisibility Index” in the End Notes, References, & Citations [6]

    Fungible:

    Think “interchangeable”.  Each unit of money is exactly the same as any other unit of money and can be interchanged with other unit easily without any loss of value or undue costs.  One troy ounce of gold has the same monetary value as any other one troy ounce of gold.  A single $100 bill is perfectly interchangeable with one hundred $1 bills. In the world of commodities (commodity trading), one bushel of wheat is exactly the same as any other bushel of wheat.
    Conversely, some forms of money are not easily interchangeable. For example, one seashell might not be easily interchanged with another seashell. One “Rai stone” will probably not be easily fungible with another Rai stone. [7]

    Index Note:  See “Fungibility Index” in the End Notes, References, & Citations below. [8]

    Portable:

    The ability for money to be moved from location to location without undue costs or difficulty.  This can be a function of its weight, density, and transportation costs.
    Moving gold or silver across any significant distance has considerable risks and costs associated with it. Moving bars of gold would require secure transport, possibly necessitating security personnel, and some sort of guarantee of the purity of the gold bars upon delivery. In real world terms, moving gold and silver bars typically cost 0.1% – 1.0% of the value of the commodity. Thus, moving gold or silver one hundred times might actually cost the entire value of the stack. Not very cost efficient. This also does not address the risk of loss, which would result in 100% of the loss of value of the value.
    In comparison, moving one hundred U.S. dollars electronically is very cost efficient and very low risk. It is one of the reasons why checks, bank wires, ATM’s, Venmo, and CashApp have become so popular as means of moving currency.

    Monetary Note:  The ability to move money relatively easily with little friction (especially for trading purposes) is called “saleable over space“.

    Index Note:  See “Portability Index” in the End Notes, References, & Citations below. [9]

    Reliable:

    Money which does not break or degrade easily over time.Reliable” is also called “durable“. 
    Seashells, goats, cigarettes, and dollars (which have all been used as money) all have a varying amount of reliability.  In the case of seashells, moving them around can cause them to break and reduce their reliability as a form of payment.  Goats require feeding and care, which can be costly.  Cigarettes are very fragile and always go stale.  And, eventually, goats and cigarettes perish.  As for physical US dollars, they subject to being burned, torn, worn down, or even outright lost.
    Gold and silver were highly sought after due to the fact that they did not chemically, biologically, or mechanically degrade over time. While silver’s surface can oxidize slightly, it is literally only a couple of atoms thick and is easily wiped off. While gold and silver do not have very good mechanical properties (they have very low hardness and strength levels), they are both ductile [10] (especially gold) which allows it them to be formed, imprinted, bumped, and jostled without causing any breakage. This basic mechanical property of ductility has allowed gold and silver to retain their shape, recognizability, dependability for literally thousands of years. Quite an accomplishment!

    Monetary Note:  We’ll talk about the U.S. Dollar’s lack of reliability by way of printing in the section “Scarce” below.

    Monetary Note:  The ability for dependable money to retain its value (especially for trading purposes) over time is called “saleable over time“.

    Index Note:  See the “Reliability Index” in the “End Notes, References, & Citations below. [11]

    Scarce:

    A money that is scarce has either an ultimate supply cap or can only be increased in supply by very small quantities with corresponding proportional costs.
    For a real life example, in the case of gold, it has an inflation rate of about 1.5%. In other words, each year, new gold is added to the existing supply which is about 1.5% of the existing supply. For the most part, the limiting factors would be technology, cost of production, and physical availability of gold within the mines. In this case, on an annual basis, gold has a relatively high amount of “scarceness”. [12]
    As for fiat currencies, new units can be created and added to the existing supply quite quickly and easily. Due to this ease of creation, it is not uncommon for fiat currency inflation rates to be double digits (of percent). [13] For the most part, governments can increase their fiat currencies electronically without any real opportunity costs. Thus, on an annual basis, fiat currencies have relatively low “scarceness“.

    Index Note:  See the “Scarcity Index” in the “End Notes, References, & Citations below. [14]

    Controllable:

    “Controllable” is the ability for the owner of an asset to control where, when, how, and with whom that asset is traded, without interference. In this instance, what I call “controllable” I mean as individually controllable. Said another way, the individual owner of the money has the unencumbered ability to receive, retain, and remit (send) money without being compelled to move it nor onerous constraint of movement.
    Currently, it is quite easy for the federal government and individual banks to confiscate our currency (both physical and electronic). Thus, making the U.S. dollar very low on the controllable scale.

    Author’s Note: The concept of individually controllable gets into the entire topic of “logic of violence” which we covered in a previous article, here, in which I referred to the book “The Sovereign Individual“. For additional thoughts on the topics of individually controllable, logic of violence, and power projection, I highly recommend the book “Softwar: A Novel Theory on Power Projection and the National Strategic Significance of Bitcoin” by Major Jason P. Lowery (USSF).

    Index Note:  See the “Controllability Index” in the End Notes, References, & Citations below. [15]

    Opportunity Costed: [16]

    For anyone who wants to add to the existing supply of money, there must be some sort of significant cost associated with the creation and addition to the current supply.  The cost to add to the existing supply of money must be so high that each individual must make a difficult and impactful decision as to what is in their best interest – either work to produce more more monetary units or expend time and effort on other endeavors.  For example, either mining for gold or working for someone else as an accountant or opening a restaurant.
    For any commodity money which does not have an ultimate supply cap, then the cost of increasing the supply should be in proportion to the monetary value of the existing money supply. So, if the supply of monetary units is going to increase by 1% then the cost of increasing that supply should be equal to 1% of the total supply. For example, if the total market value of a currency in supply is $1T, then increasing it by 1% should cost ~$10B.

    Author’s Note: For the record, I am not advocating for the above method of “proportional costs”, but if I were pressed to provide a solution in the absence of a money which does not have an ultimate supply cap (as bitcoin does of 21M) then this would be my proposed solution.

    Author’s Note:Scarce” and “opportunity costed” seem to be very similar but are different. In short, some entity could expend an inordinate amount of resources to bring a considerable amount of a scarce commodity to the market, thus creating a significant disruption to the monetary supply. In this case, the commodity would have a significant opportunity cost but low scarcity. This has happened with gold several times in history (i.e. Spain bringing gold from the America’s into Europe, the 1850’s California “gold rush”).

    Monetary Note: The ultimate governor of opportunity cost is the “Second Law of Thermodynamics“. [17] In the context of money and economics, the Second Law states “There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch.[18] We will explore the role of the Second Law in future articles.

    Index Note:  See “Opportunity Index” in the End Notes, References, & Citations below. [19]

    Verifiable:

    “Verifiable” is the ability for the holder of the money to take reasonable steps to ensure that a unit of money is valid and has not been forged (counterfeited) without incurring unreasonable costs.
    As a real life example, the U.S. Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve have actually done a good job of embedding effective and cost-efficient anti- counterfeiting measures within physical dollar bills.  This changes the “logic of violence(which we talked about in a previous post here), thus making the expense of creating forgeries more costly than the benefits (when coupled with law enforcement and the judicial system as criminal deterrents).

    Monetary Note: In the case of gold, there have been a variety of methods for determining if a gold coin or bar is valid. [20] In all cases, these are relatively costly methods in time, material, and capital.

    Index Note:  See “Verifiability Index” in the End Notes, References, & Citations below. [21X]

    Chermatistics Index:

    “Chrematistics” is the economics study of money. [22] As mentioned above, when considered for monetary purposes, the market does not value the underlying commodity itself; instead it values the monetary properties of the commodity.
    As a result, I have made best attempts to try to devise a contextually appropriate and objective measure of these nine monetary attributes in combination. Consequently, we could calculate just how much something can be considered dependable money by combining all of the above indices into a single measure which I call the “Chrematistics Index“. [23] [24]
    As far as we have seen, these is no one thing which has ever fulfilled all of the above attributes and characteristics completely.  If anything, all things that we have called “money” in the past have existed on a spectrum of values.
    For the record, I think gold did a good job as a form of money for millennia.  While it had most of the attributes and characteristics of good money, it did not have all of them and definitely not entirely for any one single attribute.
    In future articles, we will explore the applications and implications of the Chrematistics Index.

    Monetary Note: Even bitcoin, which I consider to be the “apex predator” form of money, does not have 100% of all of the above nine attributes.  That said, it is FAR superior to anything that we have ever used. Taking this a step further, bitcoin is actually the first true form of money.
    What I find interesting and counterintuitive is that bitcoin is entirely artificial.  Thus, the first true form of money had to be engineered from the ground up.  Just like all psychotechnologies (which are all engineered from the ground up), bitcoin is a psychotechnology which is built upon other psychotechnologies (i.e. written language, software, math, encryption, accounting, algebra, and geometry).

    Functions

    …which results in the emergent functions (in order) of
    storehouse of value, medium of exchange, and unit of account…

    Expansion: 

    If a commodity has the above mentioned attributes and characteristics then people will naturally gravitate towards it without any need for an external entity to compel them to use it.
    A consequence of people using it en masse is that they will store their subjective valuations in that money, transforming it into a “storehouse of value” (or “store of value“). [25]
    Conversely, in a free market, any commodity which does not retain its store of value for the individual has little purpose and is quickly abandoned by the market, ultimately making it worthless as an intermediating asset. In the absence of a free market, governments override this natural process by mandating (“by fiat” which translates from Latin to “order, authority, or decree“) that its currency be used regardless of what its citizens prefer, thus subordinating the philosophy, values, and ethics of the citizenry to that of the state.
    Following store of value, the monetary functions of medium of exchange [26] and unit of account, [27] will emerge. I cover these functions in more detail in the “End Notes, References, & Citations” section.

    Monetary Note: I specifically placed these functions in a specific order to emphasize their importance for hard money.

    Philosophy

    …and ultimately serves the metaphysical, financial, temporal, dimensional, and linguistic function of universal translator.

    Expansion:

    When two people engage in free exchange (without coercion), they are expressing their highest ideals, values, and priorities.  Restated simply, one party wants to buy a good or service and the other wants the intermediating asset (dependable money) in which to store value.  They each have made the rational determination that they are coming out ahead because of the exchange; a true win-win situation. This is in stark contrast to the popular culture which believes that all transactions are a zero-sum-gain, that one winner requires one loser.

    These un-coerced free market interactions become the ultimate in communicating and exchanging value with each other. Both individuals are demonstrating that they value that particular exchange over all of the myriad of other possible exchanges (opportunity costs).

    Economics Note:  This is one of the core aspects of the Austrian School of Economics; when two parties engage in free exchange, both individuals find greater value in the things that they received in the exchange versus the things that they originally owned.
    For the nerds out there, this is why there is no such thing as “intrinsic value” since all value is subjective, not objective. The topic of “value” is an entire metaphysical treatise in philosophy that is far beyond the scope of this opening series. I recommend becoming a regular listener to the “What Is Money” podcast by Robert Breedlove for a deeper dive into this fascinating topic.

    Ultimately, good money is able to collapse millions of differing values from millions of different people into a single, objective, and well-defined number (i.e. “dollars per gallon of gasoline” or “ounces of gold per house“).  As a result, no matter who the person is making a subjective value judgement, the number of hard money units is objective, easily recognizable, and definable.
    Collectively, this makes dependable money a philosophical universal translator because it is a reflection of the values of not only the holder of the money but of the market overall. Dependable money is saleable across both space and time, making it a virtual time machine for carrying values across ages and a veritable map of values across three-dimensional spans.

    Metaphysical Note:  You’ll notice that, in the working definition of money that I provided, nothing in the definition refers to central parties nor trust. One could even argue (as I do) that truly dependable money is completely independent of central parties and is entirely trust-less.

    Defining Currency

    We’ve used the term “currency” often in this opening series but have not defined it. Below is my best efforts working definition of currency:

    “Currency is a credit-based (debt-based) system which
    acts as a proxy of money yet is incapable of exhibiting
    all of the qualities, attributes, characteristics,
    and functions of good money.

    To the Treasury Department’s credit, they have done a good job of embedding effective and cost-efficient anti-forgery measures in a U.S. dollar bill.  This makes forgery more difficult for very low cost.  Thus, the logic of violence prevails.
    Ironically, for all of its efforts of defeating forging, the Treasury Department is the ultimate forger of illicit currency because they (along with the Federal Reserve and the commercial banks) can legally increase the so-called “money supply“, (the number of credit units in the M1 and M2 money supplies) both directly and indirectly, ad hoc, into our financial system; yet we, the general public, cannot legally do so. Thus:

    When the federal government inflates the
    currency supply, it’s legal forgery.
    Yet, if we inflate the supply, it’s illegal forgery.

    From this, we have the ultimate in state arrogance and conceit with the popular culture accepting that:

    It is perfectly acceptable when the
    state increases the money supply…
    but it’s bad when everyone else does it.

    Metaphysical Note:  Unlike the definition of dependable money, fiat currencies require central parties and trust in order to maintain their proxy to dependable money.

    Tying It All Together

    With a working definition and basic understanding of money, we have a baseline with which to work. Using this working definition, we can begin to look at categories of money and to see which commodities are actually able to fulfill the definition fairly well and which will fail spectacularly.
    Ultimately, if we have a reasonable and comprehensive definition of dependable money then we can use that as a filter for disqualifying ersatz (fake or inferior) money.

    Next Steps

    Based upon our working definition, in the next article in this series, we’ll take a more detailed look at the terms “hard money” (dependable money) and “soft money” (currency) so that we can understand the implications of each and why they are so important to our daily lives. You can read the article here.

    Donations

    If you found value in this article please feel free to donate via the following payment methods:

    CashApp: $JohnYoung357

    Venmo: @John-Young-359

    Bitcoin: Bc1qgdtjlhfh2aff7c39jcag9h584twgs947yaymtg

    End Notes, References, & Citations

    [1] Aristotle defines money

    Brave search engine summary: “Aristotle defines money
    Aristotle Defines Money
    Aristotle defined money as a medium of exchange, a unit of account, and a store of value. He believed that money should serve as a universal value that allows for the exchange of goods and services even when the parties involved do not desire the same items at that moment. According to Aristotle, good money should possess four characteristics:

    • Durable: It must withstand the test of time and not deteriorate easily.
    • Portable: It should be easily transportable relative to its size and hold significant value.
    • Divisible: It should be easily separable into smaller units without losing its basic qualities.
    • Intrinsically Valuable: It should have inherent value independent of other objects and be rare.

    [2] The “What Is Money” podcast hosted by Robert Breedlove

    This is one of my favorite podcasts of all time. As of the writing of this article, Robert has close to 600 hundred episodes and thousands of hours of long-form interviews with great guests from a wide range of backgrounds and expertise. The Brave search engine does a good job of summarizing Robert Breedlove’s show:

    “The ‘What is Money?‘ Show is a podcast hosted by Robert Breedlove that explores the concept of money through deep conversations with various thinkers. The podcast aims to uncover the truth about money by discussing its many definitions and implications on civilization. It covers topics ranging from philosophy and history to technology and economics, often featuring guests who share their insights on how money influences different aspects of life. The show is available on multiple platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Podbean, and it has gained a significant following with a high rating of 4.8 out of 5 based on 2,070 reviews. Additionally, the podcast has featured discussions on bitcoin and its potential to transform business and financial systems.”

    Mr. Breedlove’s show can be found at the following links:

    [3] “The Tao” or “The Dao

    The Tao
    The Tao or Dao is the natural way of the universe, primarily as conceived in East Asian philosophy and religion. This seeing of life cannot be grasped as a concept. Rather, it is seen through actual living experience of one’s everyday being. The concept is represented by the Chinese character 道, which has meanings including ‘way’, ‘path‘, ‘road‘, and sometimes ‘doctrine‘ or ‘principle‘.
    In the Tao Te Ching, the ancient philosopher Laozi explains that the Tao is not a name for a thing, but the underlying natural order of the universe whose ultimate essence is difficult to circumscribe because it is non-conceptual yet evident in one’s being of aliveness. The Tao is “
    eternally nameless” and should be distinguished from the countless named things that are considered to be its manifestations, the reality of life before its descriptions of it.”

    Brave search engine summary: “The Tao
    “The Tao, often translated as ‘the Way,‘ is a central concept in Taoism, representing the natural order of the universe and the fundamental principle that underlies all existence. It is described as an enigmatic process of transformation that ultimately underlies reality, and it is considered to be the source of all things, the seed of the universe’s primordial purity, and the natural way of the universe.
    The Tao is often characterized as something that cannot be fully described or defined in words, as it is considered to be ineffable and beyond the realm of differentiation and linguistic constraints. It is not a thing or a substance in the conventional sense, but rather a way of being that can be observed in the things of the world. Although it gives rise to all being, it does not itself have being.
    In Taoist philosophy, the Tao is seen as the natural order that keeps the universe balanced and ordered, and it is related to qi, the essential energy of action and existence. The Tao is a non-dualistic principle, representing the greater whole from which all individual elements of the universe derive. It is also associated with the concepts of yin and yang, where every action creates counter-actions as unavoidable movements within manifestations of the Tao.
    The Tao is not a name for a thing, but the underlying natural order of the universe whose ultimate essence is difficult to circumscribe because it is non-conceptual yet evident in one’s being of aliveness. The Tao is “
    eternally nameless” and should be distinguished from the countless named things that are considered to be its manifestations.
    In the Tao Te Ching, the ancient philosopher Laozi explains that the Tao is not a name for a thing, but the underlying natural order of the universe whose ultimate essence is difficult to circumscribe because it is non-conceptual yet evident in one’s being of aliveness. The Tao is “
    eternally nameless” and should be distinguished from the countless named things that are considered to be its manifestations, the reality of life before its descriptions of it.
    The Tao is also seen as the fundamental and central concept of Taoist schools of thought, and it is perceived as a natural order underlying the substance and activity of the Universe. Language and the “
    naming” of the Tao is regarded negatively in Taoism; the Tao fundamentally exists and operates outside the realm of differentiation and linguistic constraints.
    In summary, the Tao is a complex and multifaceted concept that represents the natural order of the universe, the fundamental principle that underlies all existence, and the way of being that can be observed in the things of the world. It is a concept that is difficult to define and is often described through its relationship with nature and the principles of balance, harmony, and the natural flow of the universe.”

    [4] psychotechnology

    Psychotechnology (noun)
    psy·​cho·​tech·​nol·​o·​gy -jē
    plural psychotechnologies
    1: the application of psychological methods and results to the solution of practical problems especially in industry
    2: an application of technology for psychological purposes (as personal growth or behavior change)

    How Psychotechnology Changed Humanity Forever
    Psychotechnology refers to tools that fit your mind and enhance how it operates.

    [5] Acceptability Index

    I have coined the measure “Acceptability Index” to express just how commonly a money is used as a purchasing medium (medium of exchange) on a scale of 0% – 100%.  I consider the Acceptability Index to be that portion of the global population which allows for payment in such a money (independent of the unit of account). For example, the U.S. dollar is used in approximately 54% of global trade invoices. Thus, its Acceptability Index would be 0.54.
    Currently, considering its long history of usage of dependable money, gold ironically, has a very low Acceptability Index score because it is rarely used as a medium of exchange for purchasing assets and is rarely used as unit of account. In fact, the majority of the time that gold is bought and sold is when it is used as a hedging asset, a reserve asset, jewelry, or industrial use. Thus, rarely is gold used as a monetary asset (as an intermediating asset).
    Currently, bitcoin’s Acceptability Index is also very low because, compared to global trade, it is rarely used as a medium of exchange to purchase assets. As a general trend, though, that is moving upwards very quickly and is probably higher than gold’s Acceptability Index.

    Brave search engine summary: “global transactions of US dollars
    U.S. Dollar Global Transactions
    The U.S. dollar continues to dominate global transactions, with its usage reaching over 50% in January 2025, according to Swift data.
    This highlights the dollar’s entrenched role in international finance and trade, despite ongoing discussions about potential alternatives. The dollar’s dominance is supported by its widespread use in global trade, foreign exchange transactions, and as a reserve currency.

    • Dominance in global trade: The U.S. dollar is used in approximately 54% of global trade invoices, even when the U.S. is not directly involved in the transaction.
    • Foreign exchange transactions: 88% of foreign exchange transactions involve the U.S. dollar, underscoring its liquidity and global acceptance.
    • Role in international payments: In January 2025, the dollar accounted for 50.2% of all international foreign-exchange traffic sent via Swift, marking the highest figure since mid-2023.
    • Reserve currency status: The U.S. dollar remains the world’s primary reserve currency, with 58% of total allocated foreign exchange reserves held in dollars as of mid-2024.”

    As a proxy, we could use the percentage that a particular commodity is held “in reserve“. For example, the U.S. dollar (USD) is held as the global reserve currency at a very high percentage by many countries. In contrast, gold is held at a much lower percentage by countries (and their respective central banks). As for bitcoin, hundreds of institutions around the world hold bitcoin on their balance sheets, far in excess of gold’s balance sheet ownership (by count, not market cap). These institutions include countries (sovereign wealth funds, privately held companies, publicly held companies, pensions, insurance companies, family offices, ETF’s, and bonds).

    Monetary Note: For the nerds out there, the true global reserve currency is the euro-dollar, which is a monetary layer on top of the U.S. dollar. The euro-dollar system has been around since the late 1940’s and is a result of the Bretton Woods system of World War II. It has created massive global price inflation and price volatility.
    For context, the U.S. has the M0, M1, and M2 so-called “money supplies” (which are majority credit-based). U.S. banks lending to international financial institutions create the M3 money supply (which creates more credit). Those financial institutions then lend out those M3 dollars on a fractional reserve basis (which creates even more credit) which creates a de facto M4 money supply.
    These M3 and M4 monetary layers are completely outside of the direct control of the Federal Reserve’s policies and requirements regarding reserve requirements and interest rates.

    Monetary Note: For a partial list of institutions which hold bitcoin on their balance sheets, go to: BitcoinTreasuries.net.

    [6] Divisibility Index

    One could objectively measure the “divisibility” (the ability to create smaller units or fractions) of a money by the log10 (“log base 10“) of the reciprocal of its smallest unit (for which I have coined the phrase “Divisibility Index“).  Higher is better.
    For example, the U.S. dollar can be broken up into hundredths of a dollar, pennies, or 0.01.  It’s Divisibility Index would be the log10 of the reciprocal of 0.01 (1 / 0.01)

    log10(100) = 2

    Gold coins can only reasonably be divided into tenths (0.1).  It’s Divisibility Index would be the log of the reciprocal of 0.1 (1 / 0.1):

    log10(1/0.1) = 1

    Bitcoin can be sub-divided into one hundred million smaller pieces with perfect precision and zero cost.  It’s Divisibility Index would be:

    log10(1/0.00000001) = 8.

    When measured against other monies (or currencies) throughout history, bitcoin has a Divisibility Index that is several order of magnitude greater than anything else in human history. Bitcoin’s smallest unit is called a “satoshi” or “sat” (plural “satoshi’s” or “sat’s“)

    Monetary Note:  There are some instances where gold can be subdivided into twentieths but this is uncommon.  In those cases we could say that the Divisibility Index would be log10(20) = 1.3

    Monetary Note: A “layer 2” solution for bitcoin is called the “Lightning Network” (“LN“). On the LN, satoshi’s can be further subdivided into thousandths of a sat, or milli-sat’s. Thus, effectively making bitcoin’s Divisibility Index = 11 ( log10 (1 / 0.00000000001) ).

    Monetary Note: In some instances, money could be represented as sea shells, cigarettes, or large and precisely cut stones.  One of the central problems with these materials as they cannot be reasonably sub-divided.  As a result, they were never broadly valued and adopted as dependable money.

    Math Note: I deliberately chose to use the log10 instead of the linear number because it is very easy to increase the divisibility by simply adding another “zero”, thus increasing the linear number by a factor of ten. Using log10 dampens the effect while still recognizing the increase in divisibility.

    [7] Rai stones

    Rai Stones
    A rai stone (Yapese: raay), or fei stone, is one of many large artifacts that were manufactured and treasured by the native inhabitants of the Yap islands in Micronesia. They are also known as Yapese stone money or similar names.
    The typical rai stone is carved out of crystalline limestone and shaped like a disk with a hole in the center. The smallest may be 3.5 centimetres (1.4 in) in diameter. The largest extant stone is located on Rumung island, near the Riy village; it is 3.6 metres (12 ft) in diameter and 50 centimetres (20 in) thick, and weighs 4,000 kilograms (8,800 lb).
    Rai stones were quarried on several of the Micronesian islands, mainly Palau, but briefly on Guam as well. The practice stopped in the early 20th century. Today around 6,000 large rai stones are outstanding on the island, and several can be seen in museums worldwide.
    The stones were highly valued by the Yapese and used for important ceremonial gifts. The ownership of a large stone, which would be too difficult to move, was established by its history as recorded in oral tradition rather than by its location. Appending a transfer to the oral history of the stone thus effected a change of ownership.
    Some modern economists have viewed Rai stones as a form of money, and the stones are often used as a demonstration of the fact that the value of some forms of money can be assigned purely through a shared belief in said value.

    [8] “Fungibility Index

    The “Fungibility Index” is the reciprocal of the cost (as a percent) of ensuring that two monetary units are actually the same (interchangeable).  Higher is better.
    In the case of paper money, the cost of verifying that two bills are the same would come from combination of four factors:

    • the cost of creating and embedding anti-forging measures into the money (i.e. special ink, holograms, embedded strips, special paper, etc.)
    • the time associated with conducting the verification
    • the weighted cost of law enforcement (i.e. U.S. Secret Service, banking regulations, etc.)
    • the risk of accepting a fraudulent coin (or bill or token)

    This might include holding the bill up to a light to verify watermarks and embedded strips. It could include using specialized markers containing specific chemicals for verifying the ink on the bill is authentic. Overall, this might take approximately 30 seconds to go through a verification of a couple of bills. Thus, we would multiply this time by the person’s hourly rate to derive a cost of ensuring that two bills are interchangeable.
    Under normal conditions, there would probably be a great deal of variability of measuring this cost.  The “Verifiability Index” below could be used as a proxy.
    Ironically, even though all U.S. dollars (i.e. a “One Dollar” bill) are supposed to be exactly the same and interchangeable, this is definitely not the case.  Only the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department can introduce new dollar bills (physically or electronically) into the existing supply while if you or I did that then we would be incarcerated, even though we could produce physical bills which would be of the exact same quality and composition as to what the federal government produces.  Only dollars which were introduced by the federal government are considered legally valid.  This is in stark contrast to gold where any person could reasonably introduce more gold into the monetary system; the origin of the gold didn’t matter.  Hence, U.S. dollars are not truly fungible while gold coins are.

    Author’s Note:  For anyone who recognizes the term “NFT” (from crypto), this stands for “non-fungible token“.  The fact that a “token” is “non-fungible” means that each individual piece / item / token is entirely individual and NOT interchangeable with any other token.  In fact, it is designed to be completely unique.  Hence, the name “NFT“, “non-fungible token“.

    Brave search engine summary: “methods of verifying a dollar bill
    Verify Dollar Bill Methods
    To verify a dollar bill, there are several methods you can use. First, you can check the texture of the bill. Genuine currency is printed on special paper made of 25% linen and 75% cotton, which gives it a distinct texture. A real $1 bill should feel crisp and slightly rough to the touch.
    Another method is to examine the bill under a light source. Hold the bill up to a light to check for a watermark, which should be a replica of the face on the bill. Additionally, look for a security thread that is embedded in the paper. This thread should be visible when held up to a light and may glow under ultraviolet light.
    Color-shifting ink is another feature to look for. On bills of $5 or more, the denomination in the lower right-hand corner should shift colors when tilted. For example, the $100 bill has a blue ribbon with small, blue 100s that reflect when moved at an angle.
    You can also use a counterfeit detector pen, which marks the bill with a color that indicates its authenticity. However, it is important to note that these pens can sometimes be fooled by more sophisticated counterfeits.
    Lastly, check for microprinting, which is tiny text that is difficult to replicate. This can be found around the portrait and on the security threads of the bill.”

    Index Note: While measuring the above costs directly is not possible, I will endeavor to estimate these costs some time in the future in order to create a reasonable proxy for the Fungibility Index.

    [9] Portability Index

    I have coined the term “Portability Index” as a means of attempting to measure the ease with which a token can be moved over a fixed distance.  The Portability Index is the log10 of the reciprocal of the cost to move the money over some fixed distance (i.e. 1,000 miles).  Higher is better.
    For example, the cost to move gold about 1,000 is about 0.1% – 1% (assuming the cost of transportation, security, and verification).  The Portability Index would be either:

    • 2 = log10( 1 / 1% ) or
    • 3 = log10(1 / 0.1% )

    For our purposes, I’ll use 0.5% which gives gold a Portability Index of 2.3.
    In the case of bitcoin, we know of instances of transactions which moved $1B for $5:

    ($5/$100,0000,000) = 0.000000005 = 0.0000005%. 

    If we assume that the distance was 1,000 miles, the Portability Index for that bitcoin transaction is:

    log10(1/0.000000005) = 8.3

    USD’s have a variety of costs associated with moving them depending on the method of movement. Moving dollars over an app such as Venmo or CashApp is essentially free (not counting the proportional cost of the phone and data plans, which are miniscule). Using a bank to wire money typically costs approximately $25 – $35. Paying cash for a coffee is essentially free (minus the risk of losing one’s wallet). The cost of paying for that same coffee using a credit card is approximately 1.5% – 2.5% for the vendor. Considering that the vast majority of retail transactions happen via credit cards, using a cost of 2% might not be unreasonable. Thus, that would give USD’s a Portability Index of:

    ( log10( 1 / 1% ) = 1.70

    [10] ductile

    ductile
    /dŭk′təl, -tīl″/
    adjective
    Capable of being readily persuaded or influenced; tractable. a ductile young mind.
    Easily drawn into wire or hammered thin. ductile metals.
    Easily molded or shaped. synonym: malleable.

    [11] Reliability Index

    I defined the “Reliability Index” as the average number of years that money in possession can be stored and still retain 90% its value over time.  Higher is better.
    This would fall under the general category of “cost of carry” which, in this instance, would be a combination of two factors:

    • The cost of corruption (due to chemical changes, rot, burning, tearing, etc.)
    • The cost of keeping the money secure from theft (in a safe or using security personnel)

    What this really comes down to is how well one specific unit of money retains its cohesiveness and does not degrade in integrity over time. This Index is completely independent of the total number of monetary units in existence (which is for the “Scarcity Index” below). The Reliability Index is purely a function of the endurance of one specific unit of money that is already in storage / possession. For example, due to it’s chemical and mechanical properties, gold has very good reliability and does not degrade over time.
    Security measures come in two types – active and passive. Active measures would be comprised of computer systems and security personnel while passive would be passwords / passphrases. Active measure require constant operational costs while passive do not require any costs other than possibly initial setup.
    For fiat currencies, the physical forms would be paper money and coins. Coins are very durable and typically do not degrade over time while paper currency has a very short lifetime (approximately 6.6 years). That would mean a Reliability Index of approximately 0.66.
    For the M1 and M2 money supplies, these are purely electronic. They require active measure to secure them, which is a cost. In addition, whenever banks “repurchase” those electronic dollars, they are essentially destroying them.
    For gold and silver, they do not degrade over time but there are active security costs associated with storing them. If we assume 1% per year, that would (approximately) translate to a Reliability Index of 10.
    With bitcoin, there are no active nor passive costs of keeping one’s own bitcoin. Simply holding bitcoin ensures that it does not degrade over time. In fact, the best method of retaining one’s bitcoin stock is simply to hold it (“hodl’ing” or “to hodl”). Ultimately, the Reliability Index of bitcoin would essentially be infinite.

    Accounting Note:  If it costs to keep some asset, then that actually degrades the value of the thing.  As I have defined it, those costs would be counted against the asset.  Thus, when the costs have become 10% of the asset then we have reached the 90% mark.

    Mathematics Note:  I could have chosen a percentage other than 90%.  I deliberately chose that one because of the idea that most of us would be irritated if we had our pay reduced by more than 10% (down to 90% of what it was previously).  It’s somewhat arbitrary but it was the best I could think of which would be meaningful to most people.

    Accounting Note: For fiat currencies, that can sometimes be measured in months.  For some more stable currencies, that might be a few years.

    Accounting Note: Bitcoin’s “value” when measured in USD is volatile. One could argue that, on a short enough time span, bitcoin has a rather low Reliability Index. But, taken over any time span longer than four years, bitcoin’s Reliability Index is rather high.

    Accounting Note:  If it costs to keep some asset, called “cost of carry” (to hold in storage), then that actually degrades the value of the thing.  As I have defined it, those costs would be counted against the asset.  Thus, when the costs have become 10% of the (value of the) asset then we have reached the 90% mark.  So, even if the asset hasn’t lost any value (when measured in price), the storage costs have effectively lowered its value.

    Monetary Note:  The ability for money to retain its value over time relatively easily with little cost is called “saleable over time“. A money’s saleability over time is affected by both its Reliability Index and Scarcity Index.

    Index Note: This is different from the “Scarcity Index” (below) which is an indication of how many new monetary units are introduced, not a measure of the longevity of one specific unit.

    [12] stock-to-flow ratio

    Brave search engine summary: “stock to flow ratio
    Stock to Flow Ratio
    The stock-to-flow (S2F) ratio is a metric used to measure the scarcity of a commodity, particularly precious metals and cryptocurrencies. It is calculated by dividing the current stock (the total amount of the commodity that exists) by the annual production flow (the new supply of the commodity that is produced each year). A higher ratio suggests greater scarcity, which generally leads to a higher price.
    The stock-to-flow model is a method of determining a resource’s scarcity. The stock-to-flow ratio is calculated by dividing the amount of stock by its annual production. The model is used to forecast the value of assets, with Bitcoin being a notable example. Bitcoin’s stock-to-flow ratio is determined by the predictable halving events that reduce the rate of new BTC entering circulation approximately every four years. This periodic reduction in supply contributes to the increasing scarcity of Bitcoin over time.”
    Ultimately, the stock-to-flow ratio is the reciprocal of the inflation rate. So, if the monetary inflation rate is 2% (0.02) then the stock-to-flow ratio is 50 ( 1 / 0.02 ). In the case of bitcoin, its current inflation rate is 0.84%, which would give it a stock-to-flow ratio of 119 ( 1 / 0.0084 )

    [13] high inflation currencies

    Brave search engine summary: “list of currencies with high inflation
    High Inflation Currencies
    The countries with the highest inflation rates as of 2025 include Argentina at 193%, Syria at 120%, South Sudan at 107%, Palestine at 70.4%, and Zimbabwe at 57.5%.
    These high inflation rates significantly impact the value of their respective currencies, leading to economic instability and reduced purchasing power.

    • Argentina: The Argentine peso has experienced an inflation rate of 193%, making it one of the most inflated currencies globally.
    • Syria: The Syrian pound has an inflation rate of 120%, contributing to severe economic challenges.
    • South Sudan: The South Sudanese pound has an inflation rate of 107%, reflecting ongoing economic instability.
    • Palestine: The Palestinian shekel has an inflation rate of 70.4%, indicating significant price increases.
    • Zimbabwe: The Zimbabwean dollar has an inflation rate of 57.5%, highlighting the country’s continued struggle with hyperinflation.”

    [14] Scarcity Index

    The “Scarcity Index” is the log10 of the stock-to-flow ratio. Basically, the mathematical reciprocal of the inflation rate. In math terms this would be expressed as:

    log10 ( 1 / Inflation Rate )

    The U.S. dollar’s Scarcity Index (with an inflation rate of 5.6% and stock-to-flow ratio of 17.86) would be:

    log10 ( 1 / 0.056 ) = 1.25

    Gold’s Scarcity Index (with an inflation rate of 1.5% and stock-to-flow ratio of 66) would be:

    log10 ( 1 / 0.015 ) = 1.82

    Bitcoin’s current Scarcity Index (currently with an inflation rate of 0.85% and stock-to-flow ratio of 119) would be:

    log10 ( 1 / 0.0084 ) = 2.08

    Mathematics Note: Instead of using the log10 function, I could have simply used the stock-to-flow number directly as the Scarcity Index. I chose to use the log10 function to dampen the effect. Some might disagree with this decision and they wouldn’t be wrong.

    Monetary Note: In the case of bitcoin, that is more difficult to define due to the fact that even though bitcoin’s inflation rate was rather high in the beginning of its life, that inflation rate quickly dropped and its value (when measured in fiat currencies over the course of any four year period) was always moving up. As it stands now, bitcoin’s inflation rate is 0.84%.
    Two factors prevail for bitcoin:  1)  Bitcoin’s inflation rate reduces by half every four years, 2)  There are known instances of people “losing” their bitcoin.  When combined, bitcoin actually has a deflationary rate (which is very difficult to measure directly but there are reasonable calculations).   In that case, bitcoin’s Scarcity Index is actually… infinite.

    Monetary Note: We could argue that bitcoin’s supply growth has already turned negative, deflationary. At that point, the mathematical formula breaks down since it will also turn negative. At that point, we will be in new territory as we have never had a truly deflationary monetary supply. Some would argue that that is the ideal situation because it will require innovators and risk takers to entice the savers with very high yields in order to convince them to part with their savings which naturally increase in purchasing power without having to take any active steps or risk of investment.

    [15] Controllability Index

    In order for something to be considered “property” then it must be controllable entirely by the individual. Thus, the “Controllability Index” is how well one is able to control one’s money without it being confiscated or prohibited from being used to purchase goods and services.  Mathematically speaking, we could call this the inverse of confiscation or prohibition (1 – Confiscation Risk Probability).  The number would float between 0% and 100% where higher is better.

    More broadly, this isn’t just about money that has been already confiscated; it is also about the risk of the remainder of our money being confiscated at any time.

    One could argue that the vast majority of our money is definitely not under our individual control due to the fact that so much of our “money” (currency) is contained electronically in the banks and can be confiscated by the government at any time.  In addition, even physical cash is subject to “Civil Asset Forfeiture Act“, which allows the federal government to seize our physical currency without regard to our Constitutionally guaranteed 4th Amendment rights.

    As it stands now, all electronic money (M1 and M2 money) can be confiscated not only by our federal government but by individual states and the banks where our financial funds reside.

    Historical Note: A variety of fascists have distorted the definition of “ownership“. For example, in his seminal work, “The Ominous Parallels: The End of Freedom in America“, author Leonard Peikoff describes the attitude and philosophical stance of the Nazi’s, specifically the idea of property ownership. Adolph Hitler’s stance was that individuals could “own” assets but that ownership is in name only; the final arbiter of what could actually be done with those assets should only be determined by the state. Thus, making assets the de facto property of the state and those who are at the head of that state.

    [16] opportunity cost

    Opportunity Cost
    In microeconomic theory, the opportunity cost of a choice is the value of the best alternative forgone where, given limited resources, a choice needs to be made between several mutually exclusive alternatives. Assuming the best choice is made, it is the “cost” incurred by not enjoying the benefit that would have been had if the second best available choice had been taken instead. The New Oxford American Dictionary defines it as “the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen“. As a representation of the relationship between scarcity and choice, the objective of opportunity cost is to ensure efficient use of scarce resources. It incorporates all associated costs of a decision, both explicit and implicit. Thus, opportunity costs are not restricted to monetary or financial costs: the real cost of output forgone, lost time, pleasure, or any other benefit that provides utility should also be considered an opportunity cost.

    Opportunity Cost: Definition, Formula, and Examples
    What Is Opportunity Cost?
    Opportunity cost represents the desirable benefits someone foregoes by choosing one alternative instead of another. While opportunity costs can’t be predicted with total certainty, taking them into consideration can lead to better decision making.”

    [17] The Second Law Of Thermodynamics

    The Second Law Of Thermodynamics
    “The second law of thermodynamics is a physical law based on universal empirical observation concerning heat and energy interconversions. A simple statement of the law is that heat always flows spontaneously from hotter to colder regions of matter (or ‘downhill’ in terms of the temperature gradient). Another statement is: ‘Not all heat can be converted into work in a cyclic process.
    The second law of thermodynamics establishes the concept of entropy as a physical property of a thermodynamic system. It predicts whether processes are forbidden despite obeying the requirement of conservation of energy as expressed in the first law of thermodynamics and provides necessary criteria for spontaneous processes. For example, the first law allows the process of a cup falling off a table and breaking on the floor, as well as allowing the reverse process of the cup fragments coming back together and ‘jumping’ back onto the table, while the second law allows the former and denies the latter. The second law may be formulated by the observation that the entropy of isolated systems left to spontaneous evolution cannot decrease, as they always tend toward a state of thermodynamic equilibrium where the entropy is highest at the given internal energy. An increase in the combined entropy of system and surroundings accounts for the irreversibility of natural processes, often referred to in the concept of the arrow of time.”

    Science Note: One physicist, Ted Jacobson, has speculated that there is a deep and fundamental connection between entropy and gravity (which you can learn more about here. This is a very interesting speculation indeed considering that most physicists believe that entropy and gravity are two completely separate aspects of the universe.

    [18] “TANSTAFL“: “There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch

    No Such Thing As A Free Lunch
    ” ‘No such thing as a free lunch‘ (also written as ‘There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch‘ or ‘There is no such thing as a free lunch‘ and sometimes called Crane’s law) is a popular adage communicating the idea that it is impossible to get something for nothing. The acronyms TANSTAAFL, TINSTAAFL, and TNSTAAFL are also used. The phrase was in use by the 1930s, but its first appearance is unknown. The ‘free lunch’ in the saying refers to the formerly common practice in American bars of offering a ‘free lunch’ in order to entice drinking customers.
    The phrase and the acronym are central to Robert A. Heinlein’s 1966 science-fiction novel The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, which helped popularize it. The free-market economist Milton Friedman also increased its exposure and use by paraphrasing it as the title of a 1975 book; it is used in economics literature to describe opportunity cost. Campbell McConnell writes that the idea is ‘at the core of economics‘.

    [19] Opportunity Cost Index

    The “Opportunity Cost Index” is the cost to add another unit to the existing supply expressed as a percent.  Higher is better. In the study of economics, this is related to “marginal cost of production“.
    On some occasions, it might actually cost more than it’s worth to produce more supply.  Of course, in those instances, a free market would simply shut down operations until it became profitable again.
    As an example, the “all in” costs of producing a physical U.S. dollar is 7.5 cents. Thus, the costs as a percent of the dollar denomination is anywhere from 7.5% for a $1 bill to 0.075% for the $100 bill.

    For the U.S. dollar, using a straight average (across all dollar denominations), the Opportunity Cost Index would be:

    (0.017) = 1.7%

    For gold, its Opportunity Cost Index would be:

    ($1,276 / $3,500) = 0.36 = 36%

    For bitcoin, the Opportunity Cost Index would be:

    ($48,671 / $120,000) = 0.41 = 41%

    Monetary Note: Of course, this doesn’t count the cost of creation (and maintenance) for electronic dollars. For electronic dollars, when we consider the IT infrastructure costs, this would be fractions of a fraction of a penny, almost immeasurable. The more substantial costs would be those associated with operating the banks which hold the M1 and M2 money supplies. The costs associated with the maintenance of electronic dollars is addressed in the “Reliability Index” above. [11]

    Monetary Note: Ultimately, the very low cost of creating new dollar bills means that the federal government can easily print (physically and virtually) new dollars. Thus, making its Opportunity Cost Index very low and a horrible rating.

    Monetary Note: For the curious, bitcoin’s Opportunity Cost Index has always been high (relative to fiat currencies), making it a very good candidate as dependable money.

    [20] Methods of evaluating gold’s purity

    There are several well-established methods for evaluating the purity of a gold piece. These include:

    • Literally dropping a gold piece on a solid surface and listening for the tone (hence the phrase “sound money“).
    • Scratching a gold piece on a relatively rough surface stone (called a “touch stone“) so that the color of the gold can be evaluated for purity.
    • A modern method of shining x-rays onto the surface of a gold piece in order to evaluate the contents of the piece.
    • Melting down a gold piece to ensure that foreign substances are removed and verify that no foreign objects have been embedded (such as tungsten rods).

    Brave search engine summary: “cost to print dollar bill
    Cost to Print Dollar Bill
    The cost to print a $1 bill varies depending on whether variable or total costs are considered. According to the Federal Reserve, the variable printing cost—which includes materials like paper, ink, labor, and direct overhead—is 3.2 cents per note.
    However, this figure does not account for fixed costs, such as indirect manufacturing overhead, research and development, and administrative expenses.
    When fixed costs are factored in, the total production cost for a $1 bill rises. In7.5 cents per note. This represents an increase from 6.2 cents in 2021 and 5.4 cents in 2017, reflecting inflationary pressures and rising production expenses over time.
    The $1 bill is among the least expensive denominations to print, partly due to its simpler design and fewer security features compared to higher denominations like the $100 bill, which costs 9.4 cents to produce.
    The U.S. government prints millions of dollar bills annually, with the FY 2025 print order for $1 bills ranging between **2.18 million and 2.76 million notes, valued at $2.18 million to $2.76 million.

    The material composition of a dollar bill—75% cotton and 25% linen—also contributes to its durability and cost structure, allowing it to last about 4.8 years in circulation.

    [21] Verifiability Index

    I defined the “Verifiability Index” is the reciprocal of the cost to verify the entire contents of a single wallet (or some other storage mechanism) expressed as a fraction (i.e. “one percent of the total value”). This is different from the cost of verifying just one individual token.
    I have coined the term “Verifiability Index” as a means of attempting to measure this.  The Verifiability Index is the log10 of the reciprocal of the cost to move verify the authenticity of a unit of money.  Higher is better.
    For example, the cost to assay gold (to verify its content) is about 0.1% – 1%.  Thus, its Verifiability Index would be a range of:

    log10( 1 / 1% ) = 2 to log10( 1 / 0.1% ) = 3

    Index Note: In the case of bitcoin, this would be similar to the “Fungibility Index” and “Portability Index” above.  We know of instances of transactions which moved $1B for $5 ($5/$1,000,000,000 = 0.000000005 = 0.0000005%.  The Verifiability Index for that transaction is log10 ( 1/0.000000005 ) = 8.3.

    For bitcoin, the cost of verifying the contents of any bitcoin wallet is fractions of a percent. For the Lightning Network (LN), which is a “second layer” on top of bitcoin, the verification costs are even smaller (fractions of a fraction).

    [22] chrematistics

    Chrematistics
    Chrematistics (from Greek: χρηματιστική), or the study of wealth or a particular theory of wealth as measured in money, has historically had varying levels of acceptability in Western culture. This article will summarize historical trends.

    chrematistics
    noun plural but singular in construction
    def.: chrem·​a·​tis·​tics
    variants or less commonly chrematistic -stik
    : the study of wealth or a particular theory of wealth as measured in money

    [23] Chrematistics Index

    The Chrematistics Index is the product of all of the previously cited indices. Mathematically speaking:

    Chrematistics Index =

    (Acceptability Index) X (Divisibility Index) X (Fungibility Index) X
    (Portability Index) X (Reliability Index) X (Scarcity Index) X
    |(Controllability Index) X (Opportunity Cost Index) X (Verifiability Index)

    Ultimately, the higher the number in the Chrematistics Index, the more a commodity might be considered as a valued form of money. While this is not absolute, it should be a good guideline on what a free market might prioritize as the best form of dependable money.

    Author’s Note:  The basis for the idea of creating the “Chrematistics Index” came from the famous “Drake Equation“, which was presented at the First SETI Conference in 1961. [24] Much as the Drake Equation was never meant to quantify the number of alien civilization but to stimulate scientific dialogue, I developed the Chrematistics Index, not to provide exacting measures of “money-ness”, but to help others consider the factors that would cause people to value something as hard money buy providing reasonable measures of the attributes and characteristics of a particular commodity.
    Also, you have probably guessed by now that where one form of money might excel in a specific property, another might fall short and vice versa.  I deliberately left some ambiguity in totality to reflect the fact that the market has flexibility in choosing what it considers the best money.  In the future, some enterprising economists might be able to provide better formulations and even provide mathematical constants for each index (similar to the constant used in the “Ideal Gas Law“).

    Mathematics Note: You may have noticed that in some of the indices, I used the “log10” function (“log base 10“) instead of the raw number.  That was to dampen the effects of some of the quantities, thus not allowing them to become the primary driver, i.e. the “Portability Index” is a more reasonable “8.3” versus “200,000,000“.

    Index Note:  Some of the indices (“Indexes“) which I coined above cannot be measured directly and definitely cannot be provided with any real precision.  For the most part they are qualitative and not quantitative in nature.

    Author’s Note: To make the Chrematistics Index more relatable and tangible, I will endeavor to calculate the indices of the USD, gold, and bitcoin at some time in a future article.

    [24] Drake Equation

    Drake Equation
    The Drake equation is a probabilistic argument used to estimate the number of active, communicative extraterrestrial civilizations in the Milky Way Galaxy.
    The equation was formulated in 1961 by Frank Drake, not for purposes of quantifying the number of civilizations, but as a way to stimulate scientific dialogue at the first scientific meeting on the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI). The equation summarizes the main concepts which scientists must contemplate when considering the question of other radio-communicative life. It is more properly thought of as an approximation than as a serious attempt to determine a precise number.
    Criticism related to the Drake equation focuses not on the equation itself, but on the fact that the estimated values for several of its factors are highly conjectural, the combined multiplicative effect being that the uncertainty associated with any derived value is so large that the equation cannot be used to draw firm conclusions.”

    [25] store of value

    Store of Value
    A store of value is any commodity or asset that would normally retain purchasing power into the future and is the function of the asset that can be saved, retrieved and exchanged at a later time, and be predictably useful when retrieved.
    The most common store of value in modern times has been money, currency, or a commodity like a precious metal or financial capital. The point of any store of value is risk management due to a stable demand for the underlying asset.”

    Store of Value: Definition, How Assets Work, and Examples
    Understanding a Store Of Value
    A store of value is essentially an asset, commodity, or currency that can be saved, retrieved, and exchanged in the future without deteriorating in value. In other words, to enter this category, the item acquired should, over time, either be worth the same or more.
    Gold and other metals are stores of value, as their shelf lives are essentially perpetual. For investors, interest-bearing assets such as U.S. Treasury bonds (T-bonds) qualify, too, because they retain their value while generating income.
    Milk, on the other hand, is a poor store of value because it will decay and become worthless.

    [26] medium of exchange

    Medium of Exchange: Definition, How It Works, and Example
    What Is a Medium of Exchange?
    A medium of exchange is an intermediary instrument or system used to facilitate the purchase and sale of goods and services between parties.
    For a system to function as a medium of exchange, it must represent a standard of value. Further, all parties to the transaction must accept that standard.
    In modern economies, the medium of exchange is currency. Gold has served as a medium of exchange throughout history.”

    Medium of Exchange
    In economics, a medium of exchange is any item that is widely acceptable in exchange for goods and services. In modern economies, the most commonly used medium of exchange is currency. Most forms of money are [categorized] as mediums of exchange, including commodity money, representative money, cryptocurrency, and most commonly fiat money. Representative and fiat money most widely exist in digital form as well as physical tokens, for example coins and notes.”

    [27] unit of account

    Brave search engine summary: “unit of account definition
    Unit of Account Definition
    A unit of account is a standard numerical monetary unit used to measure and compare the market value of goods, services, and other transactions. It acts as a common denominator that allows for the uniform expression of prices, facilitating economic transactions, pricing, and accounting. This function of money enables the comparison of the worth of different items and simplifies financial reporting and decision-making processes.

    Unit of Account
    In economics, unit of account is one of the functions of money. A unit of account is a standard numerical monetary unit of measurement of the market value of goods, services, and other transactions. Also known as a “measure” or “standard” of relative worth and deferred payment, a unit of account is a necessary prerequisite for the formulation of commercial agreements that involve debt.
    Money acts as a standard measure and a common denomination of trade. It is thus a basis for quoting and bargaining of prices. It is necessary for developing efficient accounting systems.”